Post #3 of Wangcore's Corollary
The people who push AI are the best candidates for their roles being replaced by AI, not the people it being foisted on.
Following considerable cuts to its enforcement workforce, the US's Internal Revenue Service (IRS) plans to use AI to supplement its ability to collect taxes from US citizens. News of the IRS's plan came from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during a House Appropriations Committee hearing Tuesday to discuss the Treasury's …
I don't think an AI would accept the job of replacing Scott Bessent. Firstly, it would be ashamed to replace someone that fucking dumb; and secondly, it would probably object to licking Trump's arsehole all the time. If only ... If only AI was *actually* intelligent. It's as dumb as the President of the US. If only anyone in the Trump cabinet displayed even a *modicum* of intelligence. It is sort of amusing though to watch the US President drawling with all the articulacy of a totally drunk chimpanzee while calling highly qualified young black women "low IQ".
Definitely! I mean, AI is superb for this, modern, efficient, relentless, follows orders, doesn't complain, just what's needed for tax harassment of folks who fail asscrack-caliper comptrol (Krebs, Harvard presidents, trans woke migrants, ...). It's so great, it's the greatestest!
Let it not be said that the Orange Incubus 34-count (and counting) Convicted Felon in Cheese is retributionally old-fashioned. Not a word!
Really, what better way to stealthily decide who can dodge taxes (17 counts), evade IRS scrutiny, and defraud US taxpayers, than through an inscrutable Orange(is the new black)-box replacement for humans who may not always be loyally docile? Panama better get the memo on this one (or else!)!
When we're done with IRS (big thanks to fave chihuahua Bessent, or is it Basset?) we'll take a good hard look at judges and banks ... (and independent News media ...) ... bet our DOGE brownshirt wankers' loyal AI can do wonders there too, and at Fort Knox!
Oh, and while on this topic, if you allow me, I'd like to also remind everyone here of our massively fraud-infested elections and voting machines that just can't rightly place His Magnificence, the Glowing Offal Orange in Fake Spray-On Cheese, as uncontested #winner of all elections, at all times, without the watchful vigilance and helping hands of our BFF Vladimir Rectum Putin, such inimitable patriotic loyalists as fellow felon Tina Peters, and a bunch of cheerful weirdos seeking to innocently tour the US Capitol, with just a little joyful pillage and murder here and there along the way.
What's a guy supposed to do, huh? Pay hush money to porn stars? Pressure Georgia's Secretary of State for extra votes? Coerce Ukraine to investigate a political rival? What?!
Anyways, short of more governmental autotomy, this time to get rid of elections altogether, maybe this newfangled Orange-box AI can also just guarantee us the very accurate voting results we want. I'm sure some brilliant computational eugenists will happily help with that too (Thiel, Musk, ...) ... One can only hope! (arrrgh!)
I am pleased and happy that Clippy has finally found gainful employment. He's 30 years old for heavens sake. About time he quit hanging out in his room playing video games and harassing folks via social media. Of course there is the possibility that this is the wrong job for him.
Time will tell.
The AI part is BS. They fired IRS enforcement agents because they don't want to be doing audits and collections. That's it. Saying "Oh, we'll do collections because 'AI Boom'!" is just a lie you say when being questioned by the senate, because you cannot say the truth. AI is just a smokescreen here, I guess they may payout some AI contract (Perhaps to xAI?), but they have no intent of actually replacing agents with an AI. The complete lack of even the most basic details should make that clear.
The point of this push for 'Government Efficiency' is not to push for government efficiency. Treating it like that is missing the point. We are engaging with grifters and conmen on their own terms, which is a crazy thing to do. They are doing this to strip down the govt for parts. They will loot what they can and leave an ineffective husk where you have privatized any function you can make a profit off of and rendered all of the regulatory agencies completely incapable of fighting you in the future.
>They fired IRS enforcement agents because they don't want to be doing audits and collections
They do, just not on the 'wrong' people.
They already got smacked wrist for a policy where they target people at 30-50% median income. On the grounds that anyone poorer is probably owed a refund and anyone richer can afford accountants. So this is the sweet spot for those will pay up following a threatening letter for some random amount. Doing this with AI is, as they say, a no-brainer
AI only replaces actual people when it does their jobs as well or better than they did. This is wishful thinking at best, and at worst it is crippling the US tax gathering capabilities.
Did Bessent say how long it will take for this AI to start delivering? Of course not, because he doesn't know and has not let contracts before firing staff.
It was more doable on the Model II (and it's successors) if you could the mortgage on a 512KB RAM expansion :-)
(The II was the original of the 12, 16 etc line, very much business oriented with 8" drives etc and incompatible with the original TRS-80 line that went on with the III, 4, 4p etc - proving that not only MS can confuse the market with naming conventions such as Windows/WindowsRT that sound the same but are very, very different!)
The job won't now be done to any viable standard, so it has effectively been erased. The deployment of AI hands some cash to GAFA and whitewashes the failure of sacking competent, experienced people who made more cash for the USG than they cost, in a moronic act of ideological showboating. As we found out with Boris and Liz, elect a clown, live in a circus.
Biden had pushed through increased funding for the IRS, which they demonstrated is being repaid 6 to 1 in increased enforcement of EXISTING tax law. That is, collecting more taxes without changing any laws just by getting people who owe taxes to pay them.
Even then they estimated there were hundreds of billions in uncollected taxes from fraud and some people outright not filing at all. When the IRS has been gutted, morons are in charge, and AI is supposed to be the police the number of people taking deductions they know they aren't entitled to or simply deciding not to file and dare the IRS to catch them is going to increase.
That's what happens when the administration consists of more than twice as many billionaires as all other administrations combined. What do billionaires want more than lower tax rates? Less ability for the IRS to discover how many income they are hiding or deductions/credits they aren't legally permitted to take.
Trump is going to cut taxes for the only people who cares about even if congress deadlocks and can't pass an extension to his 2017 tax cuts. That would mean you and I pay more, while billionaires pay less. That's what MAGA voters are getting.
El Reg's HTML doesn't seem to allow indents
There must be some way of sneaking them in as I noticed some indented code in a comment recently. Couldn't determine how it was done - I imagine some unicode/UTF8 character that El Reg's Perl RE code doesn't grok as white space.
The down vote must have a Python phobic Perl coder (you don't need indents to code in Perl just borderline sanity.)
The whole notion of semantic white space put me off of using Python for years, believe me. It's far too easy to bork a loop or an if statement by inadvertently hitting tab on the wrong line.
I assume there's a rationale for the choice but I've never seen a convincing one.
Admittedly, I'm not a language designer and I only play a computer scientist on radio, so if someone is prepared to educate me, I'm ready to listen.
As for borderline sanity in Perl, eye of the beholder, friend, eye of the beholder.