Re: Erm
@Eclectic Man
"Regarding voting fraud. If allegations have been tested in court, then they have been dealt with. I was actually asking you to explain the absence of any newly revealed claims of voter fraud from the 2020 election, specifically by vote counters, which have yet to be tested in court."
Have yet to be tested when the 2020 election is not to be questioned? Why would new ones come out when doing so puts you in the same bucket as those who already spoke up? I am hammering home the actual factual and undeniable proof of it happening even though it apparently never happens so dont ask questions.
"In order to prove that, there need to be new revelations and for them to be tested in court."
Hey look you point to the problem. 2020 must not be revisited, it is set in stone, any revelations would be considered Trump lying and so on. Yet the facts stand that following increased scrutiny IT HAS BEEN CAUGHT. There isnt any denying that hence the 2020 election is questionable. We might like to BELIEVE it wasnt rigged but likelihood is pushing against that belief very hard. And where did those magic voters go?
"The link of Rand Paul attacking Fauci, who was being polite and rejecting everything Paul accused him of, was interesting, but, frankly, not supportive of your case"
Rewatch it. You may want to lie to yourself but it doesnt stand in the real world. Fauci wasnt being polite, he was stuck buried under his bull.
You asked- "gain of function research to make it more lethal and spread easier through humans" is serious and does really need to be supported with evidence from some competent authority so you are answered. You dont need to hide behind "I am not an expert geneticist" this isnt 'what is a woman'. Paul caught him out changing the meaning of gain of function.
"I suggest you watch it again and listen to what Fauci said, and consider the possibility that he might be right."
I did. And he was caught in the lies. Go on, watch it. You wont have a smoking gun because if you remember the Chinese blocked entry and jailed those who leaked information about the virus. Information necessary in fighting it!
"And try posting a link to a reputable health web site that does claim the virus was 'artificially enhanced', and explains why and what modifications there were, if you can find one."
Not that you are seriously asking for any information about this but for a laugh-
https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/oct/28/ask-politifact-what-does-nih-letter-say-about-gain/
https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114270/documents/HHRG-117-GO24-20211201-SD004.pdf
https://theintercept.com/2021/09/06/new-details-emerge-about-coronavirus-research-at-chinese-lab/
So the conspiracy that it definitely occurred in nature and not a lab was bull. It absolutely is not definite. Even the CIA moved from neutrality to leaning toward the lab work as the cause.
"And Trump's team, in his first term claimed to use "alternative facts" after it was pointed out that Obama's inauguration was far better attended than Trump's."
And bull is bull wherever it is from. I am keeping with this discussion because where you seemed to think I needed to see conspiracies as nonsense and I am checking if you do.
"Oh, but, according to you: "Your [i.e., my] opinion is irrelevant"."
Well done misquoting badly. -
Personally I believe that any speculation as to whether Putin has 'Kompromat' on Trump is pointless."
Your opinion is irrelevant, The Steele Dossier was a conspiracy.
As I am checking your vision when it comes to conspiracy or reality your personal belief about the bull is irrelevant, it was conspiracy bollocks and has been proven so. I am giving you easy and obvious examples to work with but you want to squirm and avoid. And Krebs is accused of being involved in the misinformation (conspiracy) bull over the laptop and covid as well as his comments about the 2020 election.