Need cash? Your IPv4 stash can now be collateral for $100M loans IP address marketplace IPv4.Global has started offering loans on terms that consider public IPv4 network addresses as valid collateral. The loans build on a product announced last year by network operator Cogent, which issued $206 million worth of notes backed by its IPv4 assets. Debt notes are a way to raise money. The …
he will claim 0.0.0.0/0 - 255.255.255.255/0 as US sovereign territory before flogging the then previously foreign owned allocations to his mates.
I wonder what a class B gets these days? A lot of early adopters got class Bs (certainly in AU) which when the organisation connected to the internet were largely unused with applications gateways (proxies), socks proxies and later NA(P)T being popular with RFC 1918 addresses used internally.
Although it would be ironic if US political shenanigans were to supply the impetus to get universal† adoption of IPv6 done.
† ex US and KP
DoD already have 13 Class A's which would be worth about $6.25 billion or thereabouts.
Would be surprised if one of Musk's minions aren't looking at that.
UK MOD also have a single Class A which would be worth nearly $500 million so no doubt the chancellor has her eye on that.
A customer I used to deal with had a class A. Their chief technologist had decided in the early 90s that the internet was going to be a "big thing" and simply wrote and asked for one. It also meant that at the time I was dealing with them - late 90s - all the desktops in the company had a valid internet facing IP address!
It looks like they have sold off a lot of their space already, keeping a mere few hundred thousand addresses for their own use.
I picked up a class C in the mid 90s for myself. Still have it, use it in my home network instead of 192.168. I've been holding onto it until I figure its value has topped out and then I'll sell it, but I admit I hadn't considered the possibility that I could RENT it. Have to look into that!
I should have been greedy and grabbed a class B, though perhaps a block that large without any advertised routes would have been clawed back by ARIN at some point.
I wonder who the people renting these blocks are. I'd hate to have my blocked rented to someone doing bad stuff and potentially get into trouble myself since I'm listed as the owner.
Except that the smart money has already realised that, as they get scarcer, rental income is greater than a one-off sale. So make that $ 6.25 10^9 per year. Then force some government services to require IPv4 access and then you can charge for it…
dont get me started on HSTS policy but for IPv6
Log in to your Cloudflare account and go to a specific domain.
Go to Network.
For IPv6 Compatibility, switch the toggle to ON
its called dual stack
you dont need ipv6 on your webservers cloudflare will sort that out and the statistics remain the same...
this is pure lazy
I think the point is to not rely entirely on a third party vendor to do all the work and then hope that they don't bork it entirely with a bad update, or mess up the settings, or just decide to say "well we decided we're going to charge extra for this now, deal with it".
I wonder if the financial wizards behind this have worked out that IPv4 addresses are an appreciating asset. Companies using this facility are by definition in trouble, so a significant number will go under. The plan may be to get a controlling proportion of the available address space, and so control the price.
That's definitely the plan. If the businesses do fine, they get the interest, and if they don't, they get the addresses because we're not adopting IPV6 fast enough, so for now the prices are only increasing. Cloud providers would be happy to buy them and there's plenty of rental income to be made if you can get enough of them.
The US government has what should be a very effective plan to end the use of IPv4 globally, and it should take less time than you might expect.
The current schedule is for humanity to be gone by mid to late August, with nearly all technology having failed and shut itself down by the end of the year.
I'm reminded of, I think it was David Bowie(?) who was selling shares in his portfolio at one point? It was commented on as being a new thing at the time, though it seems to have since been normalized.
I suppose it's not all that different from getting a loan based on any other intellectual property (as opposed to physical property). I assume the company has the right to use the addresses and hasn't borrowed them from some other entity.
They're definitely not borrowed. It's a little tricky whether assignment from IANA, or more often assignment from previous structures before IANA inherited management, is the same as ownership. However, since they can be transferred freely for cash, I think it's close enough. It doesn't need to be legally identical to ownership for a loan to work.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
