Re: Theft Ring
This wasn’t an inside job but an retired copper told me this story from the late 80s or early 90s They were called to a smallish business that had been burgled overnight and all the computer equipment had been pinched. Discs and mice throgh to tower units and monitors everything had gone and the business owner was more than a little upset. He had very good security locks and an alarm yet these hadn’t troubled the burglars as they’d disabled the alarm and opened the locks.
The copper said that the business was insured but that the backup discs had been nicked too and the owner was therefore buggered. Without those disks he didn’t have a business anymore. Back then burglaries were hard to solve and business ones harder because no one ever saw anything because no one was there or about overnight. So the copper is about to deliver the bad news that they might not have a lot of success unless they find someone selling the stuff.
Owner says he can help them out as he has CCTV of the crime being committed, which from the police perspective wasn’t looking too promising. Back then, for the benefit of our younger readers, the CCTV was mostly recoreded onto long play VHS cassette. The tapes were used until transpaent and the quality of the resultant video recording was shit to put it mildly. So the copper was not expecting anything useful from the cameras as was normally the case. In this case however there were a bank of VCR machines that recorded the few high quality hidden cameras the business had.
The footage was amazing and they identified the culprit instantly, he was known to them as a suspected fence - though not a burglar. Business owner says he needs the computers back with disks or he doesn’t have a business anymore. Police picked up the fence to “assist them with their enquiries” and he immediately called his lawyer to attend. They told him that they could prove it was him that had done it but didn’t provide the footage. Said if he returned everything and told them how he had defeated the locks and the alarm he wouldn’t get charged with anything serious. If he left the station and didn’t cooperate they’d charge him with everything they could think of, search his address(es) etc.
At this point he realised he wasn’t under arrest (Mensa candidate he wasn’t) and said he wasn’t staying there, if they actually had evidence they would have charged him. His solicitor said that this was incorrect and they could have evidence and not charge and vice versa. He left and there were two plain clothes officers waiting outside who followed him when he left. They tailed him to a lockup garage and observed him with computer equipment. They then arrested him, he protested that he was helping with enquiries but they retrieved the nicked gear and all went back to the station. His solicitor made a reappearance and the idiot lays into him not telling him he’d given bad advice, whereupon the lawyer said if he didn’t want representation he was going about it the right way.
Copper said that they threw the book at him and the business owner got his stuff back. Bloke pleaded guilty after talking to his solicitor who pointed out they had footage of the crime taking place, the fact he was caught red handed with the stolen items in his lockup.