back to article Apple warns 'extremely sophisticated attack' may be targeting iThings

Apple has warned that some iPhones and iPads may have been targeted by an “extremely sophisticated attack” and has posted patches that hopefully prevent it. The patches fix a flaw in USB Restricted Mode, a feature Apple introduced in 2018 and which disables the Lightning or USB ports on iPhones and iPads if they’re locked for …

  1. BartyFartsLast Silver badge

    Mission Unpossible

    Maybe Hollywood mode data theft isn't quite so Hollywood

    1. Steve Davies 3 Silver badge
      Holmes

      Re: Mission Unpossible

      Unless the crim uses Android as evidenced by the would-be Trumpo shooter...

  2. Pascal Monett Silver badge

    "A physical attack may disable USB Restricted Mode on a locked device"

    If you have physical access, security is already compromised.

    I'm reassured to know that this attack can only take place in the real world, not by malformed SMS or some other Internet-based hack.

    Sure, it's an issue, and it's good that Apple is doing something about it, but honestly, no Russian/Chinese/North Korean hacker is going to be able to take advantage of this.

    So who can ? Your spouse, close friend or whatever other enemy already lives next to you.

    Not nice, but you just might find out who you really can't trust.

    1. BartyFartsLast Silver badge

      Re: "A physical attack may disable USB Restricted Mode on a locked device"

      Or TSA or border guards at whatever country you're trying to enter or whichever shady government that decides to confiscate your phone

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: "decides to confiscate your phone"

        And makes you look at it and bingo! it opens up and BINGO we have a winner.

        If you are traveling internationally disable face-id and make a long passcode.

        EVEN if you have nothing to hide. Make the bastards work for access.

        1. ChrisElvidge Silver badge

          Re: "decides to confiscate your phone"

          In the UK this doesn't help much. You have to give your device password if required by an authorised agent (police, border force, security service etc.)

          1. ffRewind

            Re: "decides to confiscate your phone"

            You don't HAVE to give them the login - if they really want it for some reason and you don't give it to them then it will likely have negative consequences, but, if those consequences are not as bad as whoever it is seeing what's on the device, then it's the best of a bad job. If they can login anyway due to a vulnerability in the device then you've lost that choice.

          2. Marty McFly Silver badge
            Alert

            Re: "decides to confiscate your phone"

            Or what? You won't get your phone back?

            Let's all be good security practitioners here. Would you want your phone back after an unknown 3rd party had full permissions to access it? Who knows what they could have installed. Seems to me you could never fully trust the device again.

          3. MrDamage
            Trollface

            Re: "decides to confiscate your phone"

            Just set the password as "getfuckedcopper". They'll assume the worst, lock you up, at trial you can prove your innocence, and then sue for illegal incarceration. Not your fault the cop has thin skin and a fragile ego.

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: "decides to confiscate your phone"

          Burner phone, take a dirt cheap android device with a burner account on it or buy one in country and set up the burner email there.

    2. DS999 Silver badge

      Re: "A physical attack may disable USB Restricted Mode on a locked device"

      If you have physical access, security is already compromised

      Apple's ultimate goal is make that no longer the case.

      You may never get there, but the higher the bar for breaking into a device you have physical access to the fewer who are able to do so. You may never stop someone with the resources of the NSA or China's equivalent from getting in, because if they find a way in they can keep it a secret. If a company sells devices that can unlock a phone then it is only a matter of time before that method gets out and it can be patched (as may be the case with this update) That pretty much protects you unless you are someone that a major nation state would consider expending resources on, which safe to say probably doesn't include anyone who reads The Reg.

    3. ckm5

      Re: "A physical attack may disable USB Restricted Mode on a locked device"

      You mean like plugging your phone into a public charging port?

      1. DS999 Silver badge

        Re: "A physical attack may disable USB Restricted Mode on a locked device"

        Who is going to mount an "extremely sophisticated attack" via a public charging port? You target those against specific individuals, not whatever random traveler needs a charge.

  3. Mentat74
    Facepalm

    “extremely sophisticated attack”

    Probably turns out to be something really simple...

    'You're attacking it wrong !'

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    And iOS 17…?

    That's very annoying that there seems to be no security update for iOS 17. I'm sure I'm not alone in wanting to put off the so-called "upgrade" to iOS 18, with all of its Artificial Idiocy tentacles intertwined through it (and default-on for some aspects of it (coughs in GDPR)), for as long as possible!

    1. DS999 Silver badge

      Re: And iOS 17…?

      So upgrade and disable Apple Intelligence. Why do you care if it is default on unless there is no off switch? Apple only supports the old OS for a few months unless it is the last version for some models. After that if you want the security updates you have to upgrade. I mean how far back do you think they should go, if you wanted to stick with iOS 13 on a phone that is able to run iOS 18 that choice is on you.

      I'm more curious if they will release an iOS 16 and iOS 15 version of this, to handle the phones that can't run iOS 18. They usually do for 0 days that are actively being exploited, though the fixes usually arrive the following week.

  5. cookiecutter

    Since Khashoggi..

    Apple are being extra hard on this I think which is good to see. Hopefully they'll tell the UK govt to piss off about access into their cloud too.

    What idiots like the UK security services don't realise its that it's actually people's lives that are protected by these security measures but I guess they're only journalists & dissidents fighting against some of our arms customers so I assume they don't count

  6. Marty McFly Silver badge

    Burner code instead of burner phone

    What we need is a secondary emergency passcode that wipes the phone.

    Put some guardrails around it - FaceID is shut off, warnings around data since last backup will be lost, force the use of a passcode to unlock, etc. Make it inconvenient so that the feature is only activated when a user knows they are going in to a high risk situation.

    "Give me your passcode or go to jail!!!"

    "Sure, but this is a burner phone and there is nothing on it."

    Gives emergency passcode.

    "See, I told you so."

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Burner code instead of burner phone

      A good idea, but if you do find yourself in that situation, it's possibly a situation where you unfortunately might find yourself on the receiving end of the scenario in xkcd: Security regardless (see also: suspect accidentally fell down the stairs, defensive restraint as the suspect was 'resisting arrest', etc, etc).

      1. David Hicklin Silver badge

        Re: Burner code instead of burner phone

        > but if you do find yourself in that situation

        Its a bit irrelevant if the emergency passcode has indeed already reset the phone

        1. storner

          Re: Burner code instead of burner phone

          You'll be jailed for obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and all sorts of other nice legal trapdoors.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: Burner code instead of burner phone

            Again, irrelevant if the data has already been wiped with a burn passcode.

            It really is a feature that all manufacturers should implement.

  7. Conundrum1885

    Unfortunate

    Some folks have *already* been jailed under RIPA 2016 because their iThing wouldn't unlock, then quietly freed because their story about 'The phone not working since the last iOS update' was due to a previous repair that swapped a component like the screen assembly with one from another device to fix another issue without an official Apple repair agent carrying it out.

    This has been a big problem and unfortunately Apple have made it worse by 'Refusing' to help law enforcement in this situation.

    Right to repair works both ways, if a company intentionally makes things difficult by putting in trap doors then sooner or later they will be punished.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like