back to article Starlink direct-to-cell is coming to Ukraine

Ukraine mobile operator Kyivstar will roll out direct-to-cell satellite connectivity via Starlink. According to Kyivstar, it expects to get messages working by the end of 2025 and will expand with voice and data later. The service utilizes Starlink satellites equipped to function as virtual cell towers, enabling users to …

  1. TheMaskedMan Silver badge

    Pootin isn't going to be too pleased, I assume. Still, with 1000s of those pesky satellites buzzing around, he'll have a job to shoot them down.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Nah, he'll be laughing because his mate Trump will tell him everything that Musk has intercepted this way.

      This thing will be so heavily intercepted it'll make SkyECC look like a trustworthy, secure platform. But it's apparently all OK if US agencies do it, of course no need for a warrant.

  2. I am David Jones Silver badge

    Have I got this right, a standard mobile phone can transmit a strong enough signal to be picked up by a starlink satellite orbiting at say -checks Wikipedia- 1100 km??

    1. MajDom

      Hard to believe, but the perfect line-of-sight and the specialized gain antennas on board Starlink apparently can achieve this.

      If this does 4G, I'll be utterly amazed, though.

      1. Paul Crawford Silver badge

        I think it does short messages only, that is a *LOT* less bandwidth and what matters is energy per bit / noise density, if you drop the bit rate for the same power your per-bit energy is increased.

        Yes, there are other limits on being able to acquire/track low SNR transmissions but that is another level of detail...

    2. Oneman2Many Bronze badge

      No all phones but yes some modern phones can do it, much like iPhone.

      They have demo'ed a video call but right now the offer is going to be messaging with a view to offer voice at some point in the future with some low bandwidth data.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/1cxfqj4/spacex_spacex_on_x_video_first_video_call_on_x/

      Its unknown how many of these plans relay on full fat next gen Starlink satellites that will be launched on Starship.

    3. Flocke Kroes Silver badge

      Changed plan

      The original plan was for 1100km but SpaceX applied to revise the license to mostly 525-535km with a few between 604 and 614km. The satellites have also got bigger: 3.64->20m² antenna area. Combining that with the low bit rate allows slow communication with the small low power antennas in a cell phone. One of the costs is that a slow cell phone uses a similar share of the available resources as a bigger more powerful terminal communicating much faster.

    4. Geoff Campbell Silver badge

      Not quite right.

      As I understand it, only some of the Starlink satellites are equipped to do direct-to-cell, and they are in the very lowest orbits (working from memory here, something like 300km or so?).

      It's definitely on the very edge of normal mobile phone capability, and I'm guessing that the quality of service won't be what we have come to expect - hence the "messaging first, then voice and data later" implementation, I think. Don't expect huge data rates.

      GJC

  3. vtcodger Silver badge

    It's complicated

    "Have I got this right, a standard mobile phone can transmit a strong enough signal to be picked up by a starlink satellite orbiting at say -checks Wikipedia- 1100 km??"

    Just spent 20 minutes plowing through numbers, I'm mildly confused and quite likely wrong, but I think the situation might be something like. The original plan was to put the Starlink satellites at 1100km, but they later decided that lower orbits were better -- presumably to reduce latency and/or the number of signals that might be contending for service at any given time. Anyway, they currently appear to have something like 3800 satellites orbiting in multiple shells at altitudes between 520 and 570 km. They do plan to use lower orbits for at least one later group.

    From a signal strength point of view, there's not that much difference between 550 and 1150 km -- 6db I think. But half the latency.

    Then there's the fact that it's only 550 (or whatever) km if the satellite is directly overhead. The further it is from directly overhead, the greater the distance

    Anyway, I expect that the 2 or 3 watt output from a cellphone probably can make it 500 km or so if background noise is low and there's a satellite near overhead. But I wouldn't be surprised that you really did have to hold the phone just right to make a call.

    And in the case of the Ukraine, I wonder how hard it would be for Russia to jam the cell phone channels.

    1. KalaDude

      Re: It's complicated

      My understanding is the ASTS satellites can do 10 mb/s data connections, primarily it seems, because they have a ginormous antenna on their satellites.

      1. Oneman2Many Bronze badge

        Re: It's complicated

        Starlink DtC speeds here,

        https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2024/11/starlinks-direct-to-cell-4g-mobile-via-satellite-service-achieves-global-cover.html

        Related documents released in 2022 stated that the DtC system can provide “theoretical peak speeds of up to either” 3Mbps or 7.2Mbps on upload (Earth-to-Space) over 1.4MHz or 5MHz bandwidth channels per beam, respectively, and up to either 4.4Mbps or 18.3Mbps on the downlink (Space-to-Earth) over the same bandwidth channels per beam using LTE (4G) technology.

        And some info on the emergency usage during hurricane recovery efforts,

        Starlink recently gave all of this a much more robust test when, during October 2024, they enabled the text messaging feature to provide free emergency SMS texting for hurricane victims in the USA. Despite not having officially launched, the service succeeded in connecting to 27,000+ 4G mobiles in affected areas, resulting in over 250,000 texts sent over the course of several days.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: It's complicated

          Pass on ispreview, the comments section of that site makes X look moderated .... When raised with the site admin I got a musk esque load of right wing conspiracy theory culture war talking points in response.....

          1. Oneman2Many Bronze badge

            Re: It's complicated

            Never had a problem with them

    2. GioCiampa

      Re: It's complicated

      "I wonder how hard it would be for Russia to jam the cell phone channels."

      My thought exactly - I'd be surprised if they weren't trying this already.

      1. Oneman2Many Bronze badge

        Re: It's complicated

        Jamming has been ongoing from day 1 of the war.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: It's complicated

      More like instantly be given the call logs, messaging contents etc

      Why jam when your best buddy / vatnik / useful idiot Elon will just hand it over

    4. Alan Brown Silver badge

      Re: It's complicated

      "I expect that the 2 or 3 watt output from a cellphone probably can make it 500 km or so"

      2-3W was analog bag phones. A GSM/3G/4G handset maxes out at 300mW and whilst 2G car phones were allowed up to 8W, those are 30+ years in the past

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Important call coming in sir!

    “I’m on the train”

  5. awomanmanhasaname

    OneNZ is already up. T-Mobile in testing

    I think it should be made available today to at least selected users in Ukraine even if it means different phones and/or SIM's and carrying traffic to NZ/USA where providers are already operational

    Could give an additional edge on the battlefield. Maybe as big as regular starlink

    $100 android phone alternatives to Iridium texting

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like