back to article Geico tells El Reg, no, it's not canceling all Cybertruck insurance

Geico confirmed to The Register that, following whispering on social media, the US insurance firm is most definitely not canceling all coverage on Tesla Cybertrucks. A rumor going around that Cybertrucks would lose Geico coverage was rooted in a post on X this weekend by a netizen who claimed they had eight cars, a Cybertruck …

  1. beast666 Silver badge

    More Musk bashing. Yawn.

    1. diodesign (Written by Reg staff) Silver badge

      More Reg bashing, yawn.

      You consistently don't read articles; just jump to conclusions. How on Earth is an article saying Geico isn't going to drop coverage of Cybertruck bashing Elon?

      This is like when you said a review of a Meta model in which we said it was brainless and inaccurate was an AI puff piece. I don't mind critiques of articles, I just ask that you actually read and understand the things.

      Or more simply: Lurk moar.

      C.

      1. beast666 Silver badge

        Re: More Reg bashing, yawn.

        Of course I read the articles, now who is jumping to conclusions?

        It's hardly my fault if you don't understand the concise and accurate critiques of such articles intentions.

        Thank you for spending the time to show your annoyance however.

        C.

        1. I am David Jones Silver badge

          Re: More Reg bashing, yawn.

          I totally agree. There has been absolute radio silence from The Reg on all the other instances of an insurer indicating an unwillingness to insure a particular make and model of a production vehicle.

          1. jake Silver badge

            Re: More Reg bashing, yawn.

            But ElReg did NOT write that an insurer was unwilling to insure a particular make and model of vehicle.

            See? In the headline up there? Where it says "not canceling all Cybertruck insurance"?

            1. Anonymous Coward
              Anonymous Coward

              Re: More Reg bashing, yawn.

              Don't bother.

              I stand by my previous comment, and you can't fix that.

        2. diodesign (Written by Reg staff) Silver badge

          Of course.

          Not so much annoyance as not wanting to delete your comment but also not wanting to let it stand without a response.

          I shouldn't get into tit-for-tat with people though, so my apologies for those reading this thread.

          C.

          1. jake Silver badge

            Re: Of course.

            If he's being a right tit, Shirley all you have to supply is the tat.

            Does that mean we can expect the re-opening of Cash&Carrion in time for the Horrordays?

          2. ChoHag Silver badge

            Re: Of course.

            > not wanting to let it stand without a response.

            We can all see the moron. You don't have to descend to their level. Don't feed the troll.

            Besides, Elon-bashing only really happens in the comments.

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: More Reg bashing, yawn.

        I'm inclined to go with the response to this comment that comes to the conclusion that Beast666 and his recommended news source is a "deep [troll]. There's simply no other logical explanation".

    2. Throatwarbler Mangrove Silver badge
      Happy

      Hey, there's good news in the article for you: your Deplorean is still insurable, you'll just need to pay a little extra.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        And if FSD is fitted, make Elon a named driver on the policy.

    3. VicMortimer Silver badge

      Sadly, no. THAT would be a lovely story to read: "ELONGATED MUSKRAT'S WORTHLESS SKULL BASHED IN - BASHER TO BE GIVEN MEDAL AND KEY TO CITY"

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Frankly...

    ...Tesla should provide their own insurance options. Especially if they are actually confident in their FSD tech.

    1. Headley_Grange Silver badge

      Re: Frankly...

      Jaguar Land Rover set up their own insurance scheme when Range Rover and Land Rover owners in parts of London couldnt get insurance - and then refused insurance for some of its own vehicles!

      1. BartyFartsLast Silver badge

        Re: Frankly...

        You can just imagine the loss adjusters combing through the claimant's social media for any posts that could be seen as negative towards Elmo as an excuse to avoid paying out.

        1. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Frankly...

          And finding a flurry of suicidal tweets on X , posted 0.75 secs before impact.

      2. LybsterRoy Silver badge

        Re: Frankly...

        -- refused insurance for some of its own vehicles! --

        Is it the vehicle that has insurance declined? I have a suspicion it could be driver related.

  3. Matthew "The Worst Writer on the Internet" Saroff
    Trollface

    Screw it. I'm Sticking with My 1972 IFA Trabant

    Not really, I have a 2004 Toyota Prius as my midlife crisis car, because I am the dullest person on the planet earth.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Screw it. I'm Sticking with My 1972 IFA Trabant

      I know a guy that bought a Mazda RX-7 as his midlife crisis car. He said that his insurance company dropped him completely at that point. He was expecting to pay a steep premium for covering a sporty car, but apparently they decided he had suddenly become a big risk at the wheel of any automobile, and would no longer even cover his (more sensible) daily driver.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Screw it. I'm Sticking with My 1972 IFA Trabant

        That is what you get for being a complete wankel.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Screw it. I'm Sticking with My 1972 IFA Trabant

      If only they put pious running gear in a Trabant body. Or a Philippines owner-type jeepney.

      As an aside, I havn't noticed stainless steel jeepneys rusting in the Philippines, but I suppose that's because it's notoriously arid.

      1. Headley_Grange Silver badge

        Re: Screw it. I'm Sticking with My 1972 IFA Trabant

        Pious running gear would turn it into a Popemobile, wouldn't it?

        1. I ain't Spartacus Gold badge
          Happy

          Re: Screw it. I'm Sticking with My 1972 IFA Trabant

          There's a company in Dublin who will rent you an ex Popemobile for stag and hen nights.

          Pope not included.

  4. nautica Silver badge
    Happy

    Want to get someone's attention and point out their stupidity? Hit'em in the pocketbook.

    “A learning experience is one of those things about which the universe says to you, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that again” [paraphrase]― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    It's "contact"

    Fuck that "reach out" shit

    1. tfewster

      Re: It's "contact"

      To me, "contact" means they got a response, i.e. a successful communication attempt.

      "Reach out" implies minimal effort, from "wrote to last known address" to "It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard."

  6. Matthew "The Worst Writer on the Internet" Saroff

    Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

    That's why they are pressuring some people to switch to commercial insurance.

    The initial complaint was from a guy who had 8 cars.

    Sounds like Turo or something similar.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

      I find that astonishing.

      I've heard from Range Rover drivers that for some models it's best if you have a spare car because they can have the odd bout of problems, but EIGHT? Are Tesla really THAT that bad or does it just take that long to find parts for it?

      :)

      1. Blank Reg

        Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

        Between the poor design, lousy build quality, lengthy repair times and frequent recalls I wouldn't rely on a tesla as my only mode of transportation

        1. nautica Silver badge
          Headmaster

          Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

          Just a wee bit of editing needed here to make things perfect...

          Original version:

          "Between the poor design, lousy build quality, lengthy repair times and frequent recalls I wouldn't rely on a tesla as my only mode of transportation"

          Edited version:

          "Between the poor design, lousy build quality, lengthy repair times and frequent recalls I wouldn't rely on a tesla as a mode of transportation"

          There. All fixed now.

          ---------------------------------------------

          “If you look at any list of great modern writers such as Ernest Hemingway, William Faulkner, and F. Scott Fitzgerald, you’ll notice two things about them: 1. They all had editors. 2. They are all dead. Thus we can draw the scientific conclusion that editors are fatal.”

          ― Dave Barry

      2. hoofie2002

        Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

        At one point last year I was running and insuring 5 cars:

        Wife's new car

        Wife's old car

        Daughter's car

        My MX5

        My beater XR5

        Now done to 4 thank god

        However 8 for one person if they aren't used by family members is a bit nuts unless you are a collector.

        1. Neil Barnes Silver badge

          Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

          Given the size of some of those US 'cars' (which are starting to infest the roads over in Europe now, but only exist because as 'light trucks' their manufacturers don't have to meet the CAFE rules) its arguable that they should be registered and insured as commercial vehicles anyway.

          FFS - does anyone really need a three-ton vehicle for everyday use (except professionally, of course)?

          1. M.V. Lipvig Silver badge

            Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

            Ask the automakers about that, not US citizens. Today's compact trucks are the size of full size trucks from 30 years ago. This is why I have several trucks for my own use from that era - two midsize which today would count as subcompact, and one compact which would be a microtruck today. Once I finish updating the compact truck, one of the midsize trucks goes away.

        2. NickHolland

          Re: Geico thinks that some CT Owners are Renting the Vehicle Out Under the Table

          when I was young, our family of four had eight cars.

          Why did we have eight cars? Because we sold one.

          Currently, I own three cars, all licensed and insured, and four motorcycles, and I live alone.

          My GF (who lives alone) has two cars. yes, I inspired that.

          We love our cars. Just money holes, not renting or running a business from them.

          (and to bring this back to the topic of computers and IT)

          I call my collection the Redundant Array of Individual Cars.

          Long time ago when I was self-employed, I was trying to impress on a CFO the importance of good backups. Finally, he decided to get personal and say, "Well, how many cars do you have?" I told him, "not only do I have three cars, but I'm driving the backup van today, the primary van is in the shop". We did get our backup system.

  7. xyz Silver badge

    Oh my...

    Someone actually fessed up to owning a cybertruck...

  8. Ian Johnston Silver badge

    Remember, "Full Self Driving" simply means "Will attempt to spot and obey STOP signs". That's it.

    1. Dan 55 Silver badge

      There's also the "mis-read the speed limit and break it" feature.

      1. Irongut Silver badge

        Not to mention the swerving into emergency vehicles feature - so you get maximum points!

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        There's also the "mis-read the speed limit and break it" feature.

        OK, but that's the one thing it shares with other cars. My company XC40 does it so badly that speed warnings are the second item to disable in my 'getting in the car to drive somewhere" routine (the first one is lane assist).

        1. Neil Barnes Silver badge

          Lane assist: AKA 'what happened to the front suspension/steering mounts?'

      3. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Sure, but that's a feature my foot has too.

        I CAN'T DRIVE 55!

  9. Persona Silver badge

    Of course they will insure it, with the right policy. Their issue is that they got the initial calculation of the premium wrong. Actuarial evidence is correcting that, so the premium will go up, and it probably won't be allowed as a "car" on a collectors policy.

  10. Groo The Wanderer

    FSD - Freaking Stupid Dimwit! Put your hands on the wheel!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like