
Costly legal enforcement
It is one example of free speech in Telegram, when in fact, advertising criminal services must be illegal and blocked on any online platform. The alternative of legal enforcement involving the police, courts and 3 letter agencies is too slow and too costly.
Domain registers must collaborate much better with such cases.
It is an open question what to do with content legal in one jurisdiction and illegal in another. But the western cyberspace has it mostly overlapping and unified. While the egregious crime mentioned in the article is illegal in any non-terrorist territory.
Basically all egregious crimes, for which all countries agree upon, must be *censored* on the platform level. Thus the "free speech" discussion or speculation stops here.