Good.
But what's the betting that his defence will turn out to be some (claimed) variant on autism/Asperger's? Seems to be the universal fall-on-the-sympathy-of-the-jury defence for computer crime cases.
And before you all pile on me - autism and Aspergers are very real, and many people are afflicted by them, yes. But I'm getting a little tired of it being the first thing a criminal defence lawyer tries; mainly because it stigmatises all genuine sufferers ("oh, you're one of those criminal computer hacker types").