back to article NASA tests the ups and downs of air taxi comfort with VR

NASA is testing what makes air taxi passengers comfortable – and uncomfortable – with a custom VR simulation rig. The space agency has explored air taxis for a few years now, and is no stranger to trialing flying vehicles. However, NASA is now ready to test passenger comfort in air taxis, rather than assess whether air taxis …

  1. ecofeco Silver badge
    Facepalm

    But, why?

    Were helicopters invented yesterday?

    1. Kevin McMurtrie Silver badge

      Re: But, why?

      Presumably electric taxis that can switch between vertical takeoff and wing flight.

      Helicopters consume unaffordable amounts of energy while ordinary aircraft need too much runway. That leaves VTOL planes. I'm betting that only eVTOL can vary thrust quickly enough to navigate through low altitude urban turbulence without every surface being covered with vomit.

      I suppose NASA could alternately invent a means for air taxi insides to be washed quickly while docked.

      1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: But, why?

        I think their point is - why the VR+simulation rig when you can just fly the same test profile with a person in a helicopter ?

        It's unlikely that air taxis are going to be designed to pull more G or manoeuvre more aggressively than a helicopter

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: But, why?

      Money. An actual helicopter costs $$$ per hour to use, plus the qualified test pilot to fly the test flight plan.

      Risk. Things crash, especially when testing new things.

      1. ecofeco Silver badge

        Re: But, why?

        These tests were done decades ago and the data models long since, and continually, updated with this cool modern thing we call computers and simulations.

        A smart kid in high school can now model practical everyday machine mechanical physics. An FX artist does it everyday.

        There is nothing new to be learned about vibration and jostling in rotor aircraft. It was solved decades ago. So was vertigo and motion perception.

        Now if some private company wants to pay them to do this, that's fine. They need the money.

  2. David Newall

    Are flying cars a good idea?

    I'm concerned about hordes of them pulling over to the side of the sky while they wait for a repair truck; long queues, waiting for lights to change in the skyways; sky rage; and particularly, the energy required to lift a couple of tonnes of vehicle into the sky, only to throw it away on the downward trip.

    1. Christoph

      Re: Are flying cars a good idea?

      There's also security problems, when everyone has the ability to land inside a fenced or walled enclosure.

    2. ecofeco Silver badge

      Re: Are flying cars a good idea?

      I will never understand how anyone, ANYONE, thinks the average person is going to get a license to fly any kind of vehicle. Even the lowest class of license requires more rigueur than driving a car.

      https://www.faa.gov/faq/what-are-differences-types-pilot-licenses-certificates

      - A student pilot license (certificate) is designed for the initial training period of flying. The student pilot must have a flight instructor present. He or she can solo after appropriate instructor endorsements.

      - A recreational pilot certificate limits the holder to: specific categories and classes of aircraft, the number of passengers which may be carried, the distance that may be flown from the departure point, flight into controlled airports, and other limitations.

      - A private pilot certificate lets the pilot carry passengers and provides for limited business use of an airplane.

      - A commercial pilot certificate lets the pilot conduct some operations for compensation and hire.

      - An airline transport pilot certificate is required to fly as captain by some air transport operations.

  3. Bebu
    Windows

    FSF?

    I will never understand how anyone, ANYONE, thinks the average person is going to get a license to fly any kind of vehicle

    I imagine fully self flying (FSF) is envisaged by the money.

    More accurately For Sweet F§'s sake who thought a LLM that was trained with data that omitted the fact that a city's skyline does change over time, was a good idea?

    Like having George of the Jungle as your pilot(driver)... worse in that a skyscraper is commonly larger than the average tree.

    1. imanidiot Silver badge

      Re: FSF?

      We can't even do autonomous vehicles in 2 dimensions and those clowns think it's going to somehow happen in full 3 dimensional space??

      It's a pie in the sky idea and it's never going to happen.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like