Unfortunately...
"... Claude.ai is only available in certain regions right now. We're working hard to expand to other regions soon."
OpenAI challenger Anthropic has delivered its latest model — Claude 3.5 Sonnet — and claimed it outperforms rivals on many tasks. Anthropic delivered the model — the first release of the Claude 3.5 family — with a Thursday announcement in which the outfit claimed higher performance than OpenAI's GPT-4o, Google's Gemini 1.5 Pro …
The immediate response to the question is verbose and looks like a corporate guidance on how to ask if you want fries with that..
The correct answer should be: Data for image 1; data for image 2.
These things are not intelligent and certainly not human, and I rather wish people would stop trying pretend they were.
Googled "cost per human genome sequencing by year", then clicked images. That exact graph shape showed up 100 times. No risk of being called for plagiarism when you are only spouting common knowledge. And it looks so much better to have a "self" created graph than a copy of one taken off the web.
Don't be too hard on Claude though, that demo was created by marketing.
I think that's the point: these systems can automate stuff we do anyway. Imagine this task being given to a student, they'd do pretty much the same thing: seach for information and cobble it together in a presentation. But some of the transformations could be really useful. For example, the plans for our house are a hundred years old and need digitising if we want any work done. This will cost quite a lot if we pay an architect to do what is essentially grunt work.