I'm not convinced
The apps named are easily replaced with similar functionality using other apps so if interoperability is desired, people can get something else. For financial applications, Apple may not want to give developers the API's they'd need to build software on iOS for security reasons. Especially if it would mean they'd have to complete re-write their own programs or risk exposing vulns.
I've been using a Mac since 1985 but I'm not subscribing to anything iOS. I have never signed up with Google for the Play Store and can find software in other places to load on my de-googled phone. I have long since deleted my Gmail account.
If people want to swim in the iOS pool, they can accept that not every piece of software is going to interoperate with every other offering on another system. Should Toyota be taken to court for their transmissions not being able to be fit into a Honda or a Ford vehicle? I am not aware that I can download all of my apps and data from one car, sell the car, buy a new car and restore all of that data with the push of a button. It's a much bigger purchase, so why not? They might also want me to create a whole new subscription for the tracking and spying functions (On Star, etc) and not give me any credit for the remaining time on my subscription with the old car. Even Elon told people on the last earnings call an A-holeish "No" when asked about transferring FSD in any direction.