back to article Tax helpline callers left on hold for nearly eight centuries

Appalling service levels at Britain's tax collector meant customers phoning in with inquiries were collectively left on hold for 798 years in fiscal 2023. This is according to the National Audit Office (NAO), which found the time spent waiting in the 12 months to March last year was more than double the time wasted in fiscal …

  1. John Robson Silver badge

    I feel very fortunate

    that my call was answered relatively promptly, and resolved in good time as well.

    1. UnknownUnknown

      Re: I feel very fortunate

      Mine was ok, though I did wait on hold for. about 30 mins.

      Got a helpful and knowledgeable chap.

      The only odd thing was ‘your tax overpayment rebate claim was cancelled….It Doesn’t say why’?. That’s why you haven’t received it. Was resubmitted and paid within a week.’.

      Funny that.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Not fit for purpose

    I've had occasion to call 7 times since the beginning of Dec. Not a single issue could be solved by using the website.

    After submitting a reclaim they then sent me a letter telling me I had to fill in a form which was "enclosed" but it wasn't The form isn't downloadable. I called to ask them to resend it, it wasn't sent a second time. Third time I called for this issue I was told the form wasn't needed and I should just write a letter. The fourth time I was told it wasn't even in progress but it would be completed in 6 weeks - I'm still waiting.

    Out of the 7 calls only one advisor has given me correct informtion and the rest contradictory or useless.

    I'm owed a five figure sum and still trying to get them to admit a mistake from 2019/20, never mind what they owe me from 23/24

    1. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge

      Re: Not fit for purpose

      Not a single issue could be solved by using the website.

      This is the problem with most 'digtal helplines' - they are heavily structured into what someone expects the most likely queries to be, despite the fact that those are the queries where the websites usually do contain the necessary info and forms.

      People need to ring helplines when their problem is out of the ordinary and can't be solved on the website, which is exactly when these helplines fall down.

      1. davef1010101010

        Re: Not fit for purpose

        The problem is that it's not an out of the ordinary issue, it's one faced by hundreds of thousand of individuals every year. It was a simple request for repayment of higher rate tax on pension contributions.

        There's a convoluted way to tell them you want to reclaim online but there's no way to submit the documentary proof that they require other than by post with accompanying letter. Hence my title, not fit for purpose.

    2. gandalfcn Silver badge

      Re: Not fit for purpose

      Sounds exactly like my experiences with the DWP over the last decade or so. I've currently been waiting five weeks for a simple confirmation of an earlier decision.

  3. Pascal Monett Silver badge
    Trollface

    "HMRC has not done enough"

    I'm thinking that Sir Humphrey would be proud.

  4. Neil Barnes Silver badge

    Still waiting...

    for a callback promised in June 2020.

  5. alain williams Silver badge

    Cost to the economy ?

    Using the minimum wage of £11.44/hour that works out as £79,971,091 in lost time.

    1. b0llchit Silver badge
      Joke

      Re: Cost to the economy ?

      Don't forget the compound interest of 798 years!

      The losses are greater than you can imagine.

      ;-)

    2. Ken G Silver badge
      Trollface

      Re: Cost to the economy ?

      At a basic rate of 20% that works out to £15,994,218 in tax.

      The ONS publishes a salary of £20,148 for a junior grade civil servant operating a telephone line which means the time wasted would pay for 793 additional staff.

  6. Bebu Silver badge
    Windows

    1226

    Took the click bait.

    798 years ago, 1226 Henry III (or his regent) obtained a tax levy for £40,000 (real pounds then, mind) for his army in his french possessions.

    I can imagine some Templar grandmaster on the horn waiting to try and convince HMR&C of his order's tax exempt status*. I imagine the musak being Greensleeves unless Henry VIII did compose it.

    Wasn't great year for the Cathars either.

    * Taxation was probably one reason 80 years later Philip IV liquidated the order and its members. HMR&C clearly not quite as efficient as Philip.

    1. Jedit Silver badge
      Joke

      "can imagine some Templar grandmaster on the horn"

      Templar Grandmaster Giorg, who was granted immortality by drinking from the Holy Grail, is an outlier and should not be counted.

    2. MyffyW Silver badge

      Re: 1226

      You are almost as pedantic as me, who when watching Henry V tried to work out quite how many men Westmoreland's famous "Oh, that we now had here, But one ten thousand of those men in England that do no work today" and found out that approximated to 2.6 men.

      It is small wonder he later agrees with his cousin, King Hal "Would you and I alone, Without more help, could fight this royal battle!"

  7. Peter Prof Fox

    Enquiry

    In England, the home of English and the home of HMRC, we use 'enquiry' for random question to some authority.

    1. Roj Blake Silver badge

      Re: Enquiry

      Yep, an enquiry is a question and an inquiry is a formal investigation.

  8. Bitsminer Silver badge

    HMRC vs...

    In Canada the current statistical drama is about the number of CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) employees.

    59,000 for a population of 40 million.

    The UK has HMRC with 64,738 for a population of 67 million. The UK seems to be doing better (more efficient, huh.)

    The US has IRS with 93,654 for a population of 341 million. OK so way more efficient.

    Size of militaries: 68,000 / 130,000 / 2,080,000. See where the priorities lie.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: HMRC vs...

      Notwithstanding that the IRS is at the Federal level (i.e. State tax collection headcount is excluded) it would be interesting to see genuine all-encompasing figures because the UK, at least, requires employers to do much of the tax collection work for it. So that very rough 1 tax collector per 1000 head of population is more likely to be nearly 2. Which seems a lot!

  9. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    The recent Treasury Committee hearing...

    Anon because...

    At the recent Treasury Committee hearing HMRC did admit that they turned off the help lines a bit too abruptly.

    <https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/14682/html/>

    Therese Coffey got a bit of a bee in her bonnet about HMRC's call centre staff working from home. So much so she managed to complain that she had visited some HMRC offices **during lockdown** and found no one in the offices. Facepalm! (Scroll down to Q345.)

  10. spireite Silver badge

    Is not being answered a mercy?

    ...because when either me or my wife call any government agency and actually speak to somebody they actually giove half the information, or no information.

    Rarely do they actually say anything other than "I can't advise, it's your responsibility'.

  11. Boris the Cockroach Silver badge
    Devil

    23 minutes

    to answer the phone?

    Hell transfer the lot to vermin media's call center... it could do with that level of quick reponse and efficency

    1. PB90210 Bronze badge

      Re: 23 minutes

      No, the ultimate aim is to handle 80 percent of queries, sorry, calls within 15 days

      1. Boris the Cockroach Silver badge
        Happy

        Re: 23 minutes

        We still talking about vermin media's customer disservice here?

  12. Nifty

    I'm still trying to file my Domesday Book property tax.

  13. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Measuring the wrong metric

    I was going to post as to how the heck 23 minutes was an *increase* as I remember on the few occasions I needed to talk to HMRC in the past 10 years I typically spent 45+ minutes on hold each time.........then I realised the 23 minutes mentioned is NOT the time spent trying to get hold of HMRC, it is the "typical" time spent talking to someone at HMRC *once* you actually get through to a person.

    "the amount of time advisors spend on a call has increased – it was up to 23 minutes in the first 11 months of fiscal 2024"

    In general I wouldn't be as concerned in how long people end up speaking to HMRC for but rather how long it takes them to get through to a person in the 1st place.

  14. jdiebdhidbsusbvwbsidnsoskebid Silver badge

    Needs a landline...

    Someone I know who calls HMRC often has retained their landline at home purely for this. The wait times are so long that a mobile phone will drop the call before coming off hold.

    1. Nifty

      Re: Needs a landline...

      "The wait times are so long that a mobile phone will drop the call before coming off hold"

      I binned the landline for exactly the same reason, the indoor DECT wireless handsets would get a flat battery before HMRC answered. The mobile will last several hours of calling, plus its speakerphone is far superior and it's easy to plug it into a charger if the battery is low. Now on unlimited free UK minutes with Lebara.

  15. Carl W

    Am I missing something?

    Surely if the simple queries can be dealt with via the website (meaning call volumes go down), by definition the more complex queries will be handled by the call centre agents and the average call duration will increase? Wasn't this anticipated?

  16. andy the pessimist

    they aren't thinking things through

    After 6 hours waiting (spread over 4-5) calls I said I want to complain. I got an apologetic call the next day. They said can we close the complaint. I said NO nothing has changed.

    I got another call with someone more senior who was very helpful.

    I asked why they don't have a pareto of calls,the highest call subject get a really good faq and a direct path to email/form for processing. I said if you cover the top 10 common subjects phone calls would be manageable.

    The gentlemen noted it down. Will it happen god knows.

  17. TimMaher Silver badge
    Windows

    Group seat 101

    De-registration officer tells HQ that VAT registered, sole trader, is dead. They will be de-registered.

    Two weeks later HQ send a note over asking “is there any further news on trader?”.

    Officer replies “trader still dead”.

    That’s a true story.

  18. MrMerrymaker

    "calls are higher volume than normal"

    If this is happening all the time then normal has changed

    Hire staff

  19. Jimmy2Cows Silver badge
    Facepalm

    It's like a really bad joke

    The department responsible for correctly collecting the taxes, which fund all government operations, is not given sufficient budget by that government to provide enough staff to correctly collect taxes.

    Couldn't make this shit up.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like