back to article Amazon to ditch WorkDocs sharing service, support countdown begins

Amazon is killing its WorkDocs document sharing and content collaboration service, notifying users that sign-ups are no longer available and giving them a year to migrate any data stored. WorkDocs is a fully managed platform hosted on Amazon's AWS cloud for creating, editing, and sharing content, similar to Google Workspace or …

  1. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    D move

    This is a Richard move. When I was at AWS we made fun of Google for constantly shutting down services. Now it is 6 like we Amazon is just as bad now.

    I agree with the reporter. This sends a terrible message to customers about the future of the cloud services they use and the lifespan of their data future in the cloud.

    Come on Amazon. Don't be a Richard.

    1. VicMortimer Silver badge
      Coffee/keyboard

      Re: D move

      It's a good message that needs to be sent.

      "You want to keep your stuff? STOP PUTTING IT ON SOMEBODY ELSE'S COMPUTER!"

      Hopefully customers will hear it this time. (They won't, CEOs are stupid and they keep listening to 'cloud' salesdroids.)

  2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    "We are always innovating on behalf of customers, which means we must sometimes make the difficult decision to pivot when we believe our resources should be invested elsewhere to better serve them,"

    In what way is it on behalf of customers to bin the investment customers have made in the service?

    From the customers' PoV the message is clear: you can't trust somebody else's computer.

  3. navarac Silver badge

    So what it really reads is "We are shutting down this service to make computing room for AI services".

    I use Dropbox as an off-site cloud storage service, and to allow file use on multiple computers. I do keep a local and a off-site terrestrial (!) backup. I know I don't have such a great storage need as Enterprises, but we should have seen this sort of thing coming.

  4. Tron Silver badge

    Trust the cloud they said...

    I wonder whether companies are lazily storing far more data than they actually need to. And whether it is worth keeping it all live. If it is rarely needed, archive it on physical media. No subs. No continuous energy usage. No threat of being hacked. If you need an obscure file, someone can retrieve it from the company data library after a security checked request. For long term (multi-decade) storage of minimally accessed material, printing it once on good quality paper or microfiching it may negate the need for replacing obsolete media or migrating between services.

    1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Re: Trust the cloud they said...

      You are quite right, of course. But it needs long term thinking and upfront investment to set up such an archive. The CEOs who listen to the cloud salesdroids may well only be thinking a few years ahead to their next move or even no further then the end of the next quarter.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Trust the cloud they said...

      Microfiche - are you from the Victorian times ?

      If customers want to store Tb’s worth of shite they don’t need - charge them for it.

      Maybe something someone like Iron Mountain are the right repository for.

  5. 43300 Silver badge

    Even for those who don't use the service, it's not good news to see the market for this sort of service contract - it will encourage the major player to take the piss even more than they already do!

  6. Grunchy Silver badge

    Has zero effect on me

    I don’t rent space on some guy’s computer somewhere that may or may not burn down or get hijacked or dubbed off by a disgruntled gruntler at any second.

    What do you take me for, some kind of stupid idiot or something?!

    (I bought my own obsolete servers, 100% down and $0 a month. “Obsolete,” but still vastly more powerful than I will ever need.)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like