back to article Senate passes law forcing ByteDance to sell off TikTok – or face a US ban

The US Senate has passed a bill that compels TikTok's Chinese owner ByteDance to offload the app to a US-approved buyer or face a ban. President Biden has indicated he will sign it into law. The bill – formally known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, or PFACAA as we call it – …

  1. Sora2566 Silver badge

    Whelp

    That'll put the cat amongst the pigeons.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Whelp

      A cat may make the pigeons jump, but it rarely catches one.

      1. elsergiovolador Silver badge

        Re: Whelp

        On a side note, pigeon actually looks like a pig that has been evolving for eon times.

        1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

          Re: Whelp

          Sir, have you no shame?

  2. Adair Silver badge

    Nobody needs $app

    'TikTok' could vanish tomorrow and the world would carry on, while someone could sit down and code the next 'TikTok'.

    In the end it's just a sad little social media app for people with nothing better to do with their time. Like me, sitting here stabbing this out on a pathetically small phone 'keyboard', as though my opinion is important.

    1. Spazturtle Silver badge

      Re: Nobody needs $app

      TikTok itself is basically just a clone of Vine, Musk could just bring it back.

      1. Third Electric

        Re: Nobody needs $app

        Musk has more chance of reviving his dead marriages than Vine. And thats probably more than he has of saving his cybertruck from failing.

      2. imanidiot Silver badge

        Re: Nobody needs $app

        Not entirely true. The strength of TikTok (and why it so rapidly forced all comparable apps off the market) is it's in built video editing tools, much of it locked down in (software) patents which makes it very easy for end users to make the videos they want (and also a large factor in why everything on TikTok is so exactly the same. They're all using the same sorts of defaults, the same music, the same settings. It's all so bland and blatant copy-paste).

        If you wanted to bring back Vine, you'd have to find a way to incorporate those on-device/phone video editing tools and a way to circumvent the patents and the litigation that's undoubtedly going to follow. I barely used Vine but I remember it being pretty clunky on the back end.

    2. elsergiovolador Silver badge

      Re: Nobody needs $app

      while someone could sit down and code the next 'TikTok'.

      Coding such an app is just 1-5% of getting there. You need infrastructure and staff to take care of traffic, illegal content, marketing and so on.

      That means you also need a massive funding. It's not the 2000s anymore where anyone could launch a service from their basement and manage it.

      If you release something like TikTok today, most likely competition will flood it with all sorts of illegal material and keep reporting you for hosting it until service provider kicks you out and you get in all sorts of trouble, that of course on top of DDoS attacks.

      1. 43300 Silver badge

        Re: Nobody needs $app

        Surprised the CIA hasn't funded a competitor to it yet...

        1. Third Electric

          Re: Nobody needs $app

          It has.....theyre all US based.

        2. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

          Re: Nobody needs $app

          >Surprised the CIA hasn't funded a competitor to it yet...

          It could but it would have to be paid through an existing aerospace/defense supplier

          It would cost $40-50bn for no reason

          It would spout right wing propaganda

          People would spot it immediately

          1. bombastic bob Silver badge
            Stop

            Re: Nobody needs $app

            It would spout right wing propaganda

            You've never heard of NPR have you...

            1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

              Re: Nobody needs $app

              >You've never heard of NPR have you...

              I don't listen to radio - it's how they get rays into your brain

            2. seldom

              Re: Nobody needs $app

              Is that really you?

              If it is your CAPSLOCK key seems to be broken.

        3. MachDiamond Silver badge

          Re: Nobody needs $app

          "Surprised the CIA hasn't funded a competitor to it yet..."

          They've funded a dozen that were all designed to government spec. You don't hear about them as they're dead a hour after being released and the back end thoroughly rooted (both in an IT and Aussie way).

      2. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        Re: Nobody needs $app

        "You need infrastructure and staff to take care of traffic, illegal content, marketing and so on."

        OP points out that in this case "you" would be Musk.

    3. JohnH108

      Re: Nobody needs $app

      They already have it's called Clapper.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    OK, let's follow this through then..

    .. when will Microsoft, Adobe, Google, Microsoft (etc etc, it's a long list) be forced to sell chunks to European companies because they're spying on EU users? And that's actually not even hard to prove.

    It's not that I have any love for China, Tiktok or any other mass software distraction, but the whole argument to force Tiktok to sell stinks of simply a desire to share in their profits or cull any non-US competition more than an actual interest in the safety of the US audience. It simply doesn't stack up logically, so I'm calling BS.

    1. My-Handle

      Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

      Yep. Meta and Google especially are renowned for hoovering up every bit of data they can, regardless of what a person might have signed up for. And they've been doing it for decades. But apparently it's not as funny when someone else does it.

      1. MachDiamond Silver badge

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        "But apparently it's not as funny when someone else does it."

        The difference is that they have Zuck's private bits wired up so they can give him a little tingle when he veers too much. Back doors have been installed, etc.

        1. bemusedHorseman
          Trollface

          "Only" a little tingle?

          If I were them, I would've made sure Zuck - and Musk, and all the other "tech bros" - had permanently implanted >KZERRTT!< generators hooked up to their wedding vegetables...

    2. hoola Silver badge

      Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

      I really don't understand how forcing a company to sell part of it's operation really changes things.

      Just because the "owner" is based in the host country does not change anything in terms of operation. They can still pretty much do what they want.

      1. SundogUK Silver badge

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        It makes a difference when the owner is 100% controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.

        1. 43300 Silver badge

          Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

          The situation in practice isn't much different with US-owned companies - if the US government tells them to hand over data, they will normally do so and in many cases are legally obliged to.

          1. Andy The Hat Silver badge

            Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

            "The situation in practice isn't much different with US-owned companies ..."

            But you fail to see the basic problem. China - bad, pseudo-democratic, spies on the rest of world and its own citizens. US - good, pseudo-democratic, spies on the rest of world and its own ... I guess my argument fails ...

            As for the UK - like a good cat, we just work for whoever feeds those with noses in the trough, whichever autocracy they run.

            1. imanidiot Silver badge

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              no-no, you get it wrong. The US pinky promises with cherries on top that it won't do anything bad with the data it hoovers up from the rest of the word (while everyone can see they have their fingers crossed and hear the sarcastic tone in their voice). China makes no such promises.

              1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

                Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

                But China can't really do anything with my data.

                The US government can read out a list of my Facebook posts if I'm court on a jury.

                Or if I'm not blessed to be a US citizen, the immigration officials can look through a list of my Twitter likes to make sure I support his preferred Shitgibbon for president

                1. MachDiamond Silver badge

                  Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

                  "The US government can read out a list of my Facebook posts if I'm court on a jury."

                  Maybe that doesn't worry you, but it should. They won't read out your farcebook posts verbatim. They'll summarize and leave out what they like to support the narrative they are going to present about you. It's just like the telemarketers that will ask innocuous questions such as "can you hear me ok?" so they have a recording of you saying "yes". BTW, never say "yes" on a phone call.

            2. TheInstigator

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              The UK will always ever be - the US's bitch

          2. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

            Companies in the US are quite willing to tell the government to fuck off. Executives are not worried about being forced to take a short walk off the tallest building in town in response.

            1. TheInstigator

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              lol - although not 100% directly comparable, that worked well for the likes of Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden and Julian Assange right?

              Whatever happened to truth, democracy, justice and the rule of law?

              1. Anonymous Coward
                Anonymous Coward

                Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

                Didn't they get in the way of profit for a certain orange grifter?

                1. while 1 do {}

                  Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

                  For what "secrets" they exposed - I think it was more that they got in the way of the USA doing whatever it wants when it wants

          3. TheInstigator

            Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

            But the US would only ever do this as a last resort on the basis of truth, justice, democracy and the rule of law - whilst the Chinese are just in it to take over the world

        2. Third Electric

          Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

          > It is now run by a limited liability company based in Los Angeles and Singapore but is essentially owned by ByteDance. While its founders own only 20% of ByteDance, it's the controlling stake in the company. About 60% is owned by institutional investors, including major US investment firms such as General Atlantic, Susquehanna and Sequoia Capital. The remaining 20% is owned by employees around the world. Three of its five board members are American.

          Sauce: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-68681786

          Grow up, do better or go home.

          1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

            Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

            So if the owners of the controlling stake refuse to sell there will be some large institutional investors very angry with the US govt. if they actually go ahead and close it down. OK, they may also be very angry with the controlling stake owners but in practical terms it's US politicians who will be the butt of that anger. Then there are all the US voters or potential voters who use it and the content generators who make money from it, also many of whom will be US voters or potential voters.

            Sir Humphrey would categorise this one as bold or even courageous.

            1. Grogan Silver badge

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              Yeah, "look what you made us do" doesn't actually reverse the onus. It's the U.S. government doing this, not stake holders.

            2. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              > there will be some large institutional investors very angry with the US govt.

              Some people (very smart people, the best people) might say that the reason for the switch to pro-TikTok stance by the former glorious leader of the USA might be connected to one of his billionaire funders being a bigger holder of Bytedance

            3. MachDiamond Silver badge

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              "Then there are all the US voters or potential voters who use it and the content generators who make money from it, also many of whom will be US voters or potential voters."

              How would one tell these days if elections are honest? What is very easy to be sure of is big donors and healthy bank account balances. The politicians are more concerned about campaign contributions and being able to outspend their opponents, hiring good spin doctors and image managers to make sure they win (again).

            4. Excused Boots Silver badge

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              Sir Humphrey would categorise this one as bold or even courageous.

              Extremely courageous, I’d have thought!

        3. Alumoi Silver badge

          Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

          It makes a difference when the owner is 100% controlled by the government.

          There, much better.

          1. SundogUK Silver badge

            Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

            The Chinese government has no limits on its power; the US government, for all its flaws, still does.

            1. OneOfTheFoundingFathers

              Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

              @SundogUK What planet are you on?

              Do you know what an Executive Order is in the US? It'a a method by which the President can by-pass the usual oversight with any of the decisions that he makes to make something he wants to happen - happen quicker

              Would you like to revisit your statement?

        4. TheInstigator

          Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

          "It makes a difference when the owner is 100% controlled by the Chinese Communist Party."

          100% correct here @SundogUK

          America doesn't commit human rights violations or allows other countries to do it, they promote freedom, democracy, justice and the rule of law wherever they go - and they certainly don't indulge in nepotism

          The US all the way! Hoorah Hoorah - does anyone have an American flag I can wave and a Bud I can drink?

      2. TheInstigator

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        "I really don't understand how forcing a company to sell part of it's operation really changes things.

        Just because the "owner" is based in the host country does not change anything in terms of operation. They can still pretty much do what they want."

        This is wrong - the current TikTok owners are CHINESE and as such are THE ENEMY.

        If it was owned by an American company then being American everything they do would be legitimate and above the law.

    3. Jadith

      Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

      I don't think the spying is really the big issue here. If it were, then I doubt it would have such support.

      The big fear is the Chinese government having direct access to so many American viewers. Not much effort would be required to weaponize some propaganda and push it right in front of those eyeballs.

      1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        >Not much effort would be required to weaponize some propaganda and push it right in front of those eyeballs.

        So sell it to Fox News (*)

        * not legally news, for entertainment purposes only. Do not vote or operate heavy machinery after consuming Fox News. It is dangerous to exceed the stated dose

      2. Excused Boots Silver badge

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        "The big fear is the Chinese government having direct access to so many American viewers. Not much effort would be required to weaponize some propaganda and push it right in front of those eyeballs."

        This does seem to be the underlaying ‘concern’ shall we say!

        As far as I know, TikTok is mostly used by younger people, probably not those in possession of state secrets. The fear appears to be that TikTok is (effectively) run by ByteDance, which is based in China and although a, theoretically independent company, the Chinese government can easily exert a degree of ‘behind the scenes’ direction - do this or something unpleasant might well happen to a member of your family.

        Now this may or may not be a realistic proposition, but, playing devils advocate - could the CCP, manipulate what is seen on TikTok, in such a way to influence viewers to vote a certain way, to believe a certain thing, etc?

        Probably not really, I would hope that the average American young person is a little more clued up. But maybe it only takes the ability to sway a small minority to make a big difference.

        Anyhow, before the downvotes wade in, let me make it clear that I think this is unnecessary, does seem to be a case of ‘not invented here’ hence bad, and is very likely to be something which bites the next US administration very much in the backside! I am just trying to set what, what I think at least, is the logical justification for it.

    4. Jaybus

      Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

      None of those companies have board members appointed by the US government......ByteDance does. The US does not have a law compelling all companies and individuals to collaborate with state intelligence agencies......China does. If those two things happen in future to Microsoft, Adobe, Google, then it would be time for the EU to do something similar.

      1. OneOfTheFoundingFathers

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        @Jaybus Do an internet search on Eric Schmidt and CIA

        Let me know when you're done

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: OK, let's follow this through then..

        "None of those companies have board members appointed by the US government"

        Maybe not directly, but lots of people in tech in the US have links to US intelligence agencies (Eric Schmidt and the CIA) and the tech companies have been extensively infiltrated a la revalations from Edward Snowden.

        It's also interest that the US banned China from taking part in the ISS due to the Chinese space agency having links to the Chinese military.

        Yet the USAF were able to field the X37B which looks remarkably like NASA's space shuttles, without having to go through testing, trials etc - I wonder how they managed to do that?

        What you have to remember is - when you make the rules - you can also decide whether they apply to you or not too it seems

  4. PhilipN Silver badge

    "..used ... to ... spread misinformation"

    Can't keep a straight face when I read that.

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: "..used ... to ... spread misinformation"

      And yet people don't care that the national Enquirer is run by aliens.

  5. Scott 53

    Mother PFACAA

    Absolutely classic subheading. Well done.

  6. This post has been deleted by its author

  7. dave 93
    Meh

    Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

    Meh, China bans most western social media services because they're scared of their own population talking about forbidden topics.

    A ban on Chinese owned IT services by western countries would at least be fair, even if it's more about the money than the data scraping...

    1. Zolko Silver badge

      Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

      I love this argument : China is bad because they do $SOMETHING while we're the good guys because we don't do that $SOMETHING. So let's do the same $SOMETHING as China, that'll teach them to be the bad-guys doing $SOMETHING. The exact same argument was used with the Iraq invasion : look, we're not as bad as Saddam Hussein who killed his own fellow Iraqi people, so let's go there and kill the Iraqi people, they should be happy about us killing them instead of Saddam Hussein killing them.

      1. Casca Silver badge

        Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

        Yes. just bender over and let them do as they like.

        Ah yes. You are a vatnik...

      2. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

        for SOMEONE in ['caananites','jews',phoenicians','anglo-saxons','vikings','jews again','catholics','french','spanish','french again','jews (default option)','commies','arabs','cubans','iraq/iran (think these are the same?)','venuzuela','china','blacks','hey have you forgotten us ? (jews)']:

        . $SOMEONE is bad because $SOMEONE != us, they do [list of bad stuff we have blaming strangers for since the bronze age]

        . Anything bad happening to us is because of bad $SOMEONE who are evil and powerful and work in secret ways but are of course pitiful weaklings compared to us

    2. Uncle Slacky Silver badge

      Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

      > China bans most western social media services because they're scared of their own population talking about forbidden topics.

      No, they just don't want to have to deal with all the culture war bullshit you find on western social media. It makes for a happier populace.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

        That's an interesting definition of "happy" you're using..

    3. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

      >A ban on Chinese owned IT services by western countries would at least be fair, even if it's more about the money than the data scraping...

      But what if the Eu decided that a ban on US owned social media sites spreading lies about eg. a referendum, means that they should have to divest their holdings in the Eu?

      1. Spazturtle Silver badge

        Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

        But to do that they would need to recognise that Meta and Apple are not Irish companies and as such should be taxed, which would destroy the Irish economy.

      2. cryptopants

        Re: Mr Pin, tear down that (fire)wall!

        The EU usually only bans as a last resort. EU prefers to start with a very large fine, followed by an even larger one for repeat defenders, and it just gets bigger and bigger. By the time a company gets shown the exit door to the EU market will likely be departing quite a bit poorer.

  8. mark l 2 Silver badge

    Although Tiktok is probably mostly used by people not old enough to vote yet, i do think Biden has just given Trump a huge jump in the poles with younger voters once he begins to start blaming him for 'banning' Tiktok.

    And the way they attach bills like this to funding for military aid for Ukraine, just shows how American democracy isn't all that great either. Its clear Bytedance didn't bribe, sorry 'lobby' enough politicians to stop this happening. Most of them must be on the Meta payroll instead.

    1. Third Electric

      I think youre under the misapprehension that young voters see it as a binary choice between a geriatric genocide supporting half dead corrupt shithead and a shit-filled diaper wearing orange sex pest.

      1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

        What might frighten US legislators when they get round to thinking about it is that it might motivate young non-voters to become voters and start taking a close look at what they, the legislators, are doing.

        1. imanidiot Silver badge
          Trollface

          IMHO the next US revolution can't come fast enough.

          1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

            If we win this one can we force them to drive on the correct side of the road, use proper plugs and stop using the word biscuit wrongly?

          2. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Speaking on behalf of Great Britain, we don't want America back.

            1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

              >Speaking on behalf of Great Britain, we don't want America back.

              Nothing wrong with America, parts of it are quite delightful. Some bits are downright majestic

              The inmates current tenants however...

          3. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            And replace the current fascism with...?

  9. jospanner Silver badge

    Don’t worry, I’m sure this will be the start of regulations on all social media, concerning misinformation and political manipulation, not just ones that happen to come from China! :)

    Right?

    1. cyberdemon Silver badge
      Mushroom

      Law of unintended consequences

      Right.. As much as I detest TikTok, I think the Law of Unintended Consequences may apply here..

      In 2026, everyone around the world will ONLY be able to use their respective state-controlled social media.

      But it won't be for long.. In 2028, there will be no social media and nobody to use it, we'll all be tiny piles of ash.

      1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

        Re: Law of unintended consequences

        With AI everyone will have their own personalized social media platform with no other users. They will be in long heated arguments with a LLM which is also generating the ads for them to click on.

  10. silent_count
    Thumb Up

    Yet another win

    From the country who preaches about free trade and freedom of speech.

    Yes, the Chinese do the same banning of foreign stuff they don't like, but at least they don't do the sanctimonious banging on about individual rights and freedoms.

    1. Yet Another Anonymous coward Silver badge

      Re: Yet another win

      Captain Darling : So you see, Blackadder, Field Marshall Haig is most anxious to eliminate all these German spies.

      General Melchett : Filthy hun weasels, fighting their dirty underhand war!

      Captain Darling : And fortunately, one of our spies...

      General Melchett : Splendid fellows, brave heroes risking life and limb for Blighty!

  11. Zibob Silver badge

    Good Old US Mafi... Government

    *You better do as we say or we'll run ya outta town and make sure you never to business here again!*

    But it's okay when we do it...

  12. martinusher Silver badge

    Maybe the reason is more subtle?

    Yanis Varoufakis, the economist, raises a rationale for banning applications like TikToc -- or preferably handing them to a US company -- is that foreign applications of this nature undermine the all important inbound cashflow to the US that these companies create. This an interesting idea and actually puts a solid underlying foundation to these decisions. Its a bit abstract, though, so its presented to the 'rubes as something that's all important to "National Security".

    As a citizen I find this sort of thing deeply offensive, though. I'm probably not the only one -- Its no coincidence that "270 days" puts the deadline after the November election (because it will be a Cold Day in Hell before I give my vote to a legislator that voted for this BS).

  13. DoctorNine

    Good

    It can't die fast enough. Tik Tok, Instagram, X... A pox on all of them.

    1. martinusher Silver badge

      Re: Good

      I dislike these short-attention-span specials. They're bad news, causing potential harm to millions. But that's not the point. My government is fine with pushing crap down the throats of the public provided its Good Ol' 'merkan Crap. The very legislators that push this ban are also using it for election communications.

      It shows the intellectual bankruptcy of our nation. We're fine with employing hordes of people to push paper detailing what restrictions we're thinking up this week (invariably using imported technology in the process....) but the idea of a coherent industrial policy to maintain and enhance competitiveness --- no dice. Wall Street can't do investment, not enough short term RoI. The government's spending priorities are all over the map -- this giant package of our money going to Israel and Ukraine includes "a billion for Gaza relief". It shows just how whacked our priorities are -- homeless everywhere, people having trouble making ends meet......but got to feed the machine.....

      1. OneOfTheFoundingFathers

        Re: Good

        I actually think the rise in ADHD is somewhat linked to TikTok and YT shorts, insta reels et al - they train the brain to only be able to concentrate on something for very short bursts of time.

  14. TheInstigator

    With this and the discussion about RISC V ....

    .. I think it's becoming very obvious that this isn't down to China being a mortal enemy, but everything to do with the US maintaining a military, financial and technological lead over every other country on the Earth - and in this way they can continue being the ONLY super power in the world. I would advise everyone to not think that just because the UK is friendly with the US, we will be treated well in the new world.

    Realistically the UK will be expected to dance to the US's tune on all things - "certainly sir - I'd love to buy chlorinated chicken from you"

    I see that China has banned WhatsApp recently - Iet's see what the future brings

  15. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    What do all of these companies have in common with TikTok? They’re all banned in China. No, you didn’t read that wrong, TikTok is banned in China.

    Google

    YouTube

    Facebook

    Wikipedia

    Reddit

    Instagram

    WhatsApp

    Twitch

    Tumblr

    Pinterest

    SoundCloud

    Signal

    Dropbox

    Vimeo

    New York Times

    Washington Post

    Wall Street Journal

    Huffington Post

    NBC

    ChatGPT

    DuckDuckGo

    1. CerealKillah

      A rather simplistic view - there's actually a Chinese version of TikTok called Douyin - and before you say anything I know they're not the same - the clue should be they're named different ;)

      Whether you agree with it or not, these apps are banned in China - this is mostly done on ideological grounds - whether you believe that to be because they don't want to be polluted by foreign ideas or to keep their population compiant etc that's their right - it's their country with their own laws and customs. If you don't like it, I suggest you raise an army or incite a country to get excited enough to start a war with China - but beware - they have nuclear weapons and given they've seen how other countries have faired under Western democracies like Iraq etc, they'd probably be more likely to fire first - I know I would if I was in that situation. However if you wish to make those apps available in China you can either ask nicely - or force them.

      America also has the right to ban TikTok - but this is mostly nothing to do with ideological reasons and everything to do with maintaining a particular negative viewpoint against anything Chinese which seems to be prevalent at the moment from the West. The older I get and the more I see of the world, I'm convinced that humans are constantly looking for something to personify their angst against - we make our own problems up where none need exist.

  16. HelpfulJohn

    So ... just before the 270 days of grace period expires ...

    ... ByteDance forms a company "based" in a little house in Delaware (whatever that is), sells TikTok to them for one USDolar and RealAmericanCompanyHonest

    re-issues the program as PikPok with absolutely no link to *anything* Chinese or Commie or Government.

    Ten minutes of work for a junior partner in a minor law firm and the problem is solved.

    Of course, they would also need to hire a web-page designer to add a re-direct to former-TikTok pages to bounce them to the equivalent PikPok ones.

    But that's another ten minutes of work or so. Just do a global change of the name over all of their servers.

    If they really want to comply more, they could also move their servers to Tuvalu or some other innocuous site but that would take more than ten minutes.

    With 270 dys worth of warning, most of their users could easily change their bookmarks.

    1. MachDiamond Silver badge

      Re: So ... just before the 270 days of grace period expires ...

      "re-issues the program as PikPok with absolutely no link to *anything* Chinese or Commie or Government."

      It's just a new UI front end that pulls in TikTok data while rebranding what needs rebranding to appear as something totally different. The "new" company will make $100/year after paying fees to ByteDance to license their tech and data. But, the new company is NOT ByteDance, not at all and that would be rude to suggest.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like