The lawyers of thermodynamics would like a look at the contract.
Deep Green has operated this business model for at least a year. We last discussed the tech when it was deployed at Exmouth Leisure Centre in southwest England, where the waste heat from a dozen of the company’s servers was being used to warm the swimming pool. This was expected to reduce the pool's energy requirements by 62 percent, and save the site more than £20,000 ($25,430) a year on heating bills.
But.. has it?
https://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/23349026.exmouth-leisure-centre-highlights-rising-energy-costs/
LED say their utility costs have increased by over £300,000 since 2020 with nearly £100,000 attributed to Exmouth Leisure Centre, EDDC’s largest facility with both a 6-lane 25m swimming pool as well as a teaching pool.
Most of the greenwash is a variation on this theme-
The surplus heat donated by Deep Green’s unit will reduce the pool’s gas requirements by 62 percent
With gas, heat and energy being used almost interchangeably. What I haven't been able to find is how the deal is structured, ie who pays for Deep Green's electricity? Them, or the leisure centre?