
CloseMindedAI
The irony is if I asked a question about software for a particular problem, or described an algorithm in general terms hoping for some clues about implementations, I would value primarily usage documentation and references to usage of those implementations - at least 99% of the time. Almost always there are variations on implementations, and usage considerations to (re)load into the brain before committing to stitching in a particular piece of code (or adapting it).
Even a reference to a snippet from stack overflow would likely benefit from the discussion surrounding it. It would just be stupid to not include it.
The best AI service seen so far is "Perplexity", which smartly place priority on giving actual (not made up) references - never a made up reference. Gee whiz, so obvious, huh? Close<Minded>AI can't or won't do that probably because their policy is a reflection of their sad leaders values - in court fighting for the right to be worthless.