5 years isn't good enough.
It should have been permanent, and extended across the entire retail industry.
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has banned American drugstore chain Rite Aid from using AI facial recognition technology for surveillance purposes for five years. The chain deployed the technology for eight years across 200 stores to help identify those who had previously shoplifted from its outlets. If a match was …
There should be fines and other penalties, but some stores are having a bad time curtailing shoplifting and they either tech up or close up in places. California and some other states have passed laws that reduce the penalties for shoplifting below a certain amount so low that many times cases won't be prosecuted. If the cases are getting dropped, the police start spending their time doing other things and just sending around a non-sworn police employee to take a report that can be used to a swage the insurance company requirements to get compensated in places where insurance companies still provide that sort of coverage.
There's plenty of cases where even the police are slavishly taking the output of a facial recognition system and going out and arresting that person even though it's plainly obvious that it's the wrong person. Those police should get sued and stores that shake down a 10 year old based solely on an FR alert should wind up with serious fines. Pain is a great teacher and there is such a thing as financial pain.
These things are tools the same way as a hammer. You can drive a nail or turn your thumb purple. It's all in the way you use the tool.
Imagine what is going to happen, when history repeats itself andNazis or CommuniststRump (aka "t'pineapple") and his horde of latter-day brownshirts again come to power.
There. FTFY.
Chances are, that's what you meant anyway, but didn't want to risk the ire of the MAGAt downvoters. I get it....
At the risk of sounding like a pedant, the 'brownshirts' officially belonged to a party called 'The National Socialists' who fundamentally wanted to destroy capitalism and the Western banking systems.
Trump may be many things, he may destroy many other things, but he is not advertising himself with similar goals.
It is surprising how many people fail to recognise the official political philosophy of this party.
"It is surprising how many people fail to recognise the official political philosophy of this party."
And one more of them, since what you've put in there is inaccurate. No, they did not plan or try to destroy capitalism. Having the word "socialist" in the name does not mean that, and you can look at speeches or actions to demonstrate otherwise.
The Fascists in Italy and the Nazis in Germany ended up in the same place, and are condemed for the same reasons, which is entirely correct as far as it goes.
However they did reach that place from very different starting points, and via very different routes, so if you are looking now at whether some other group will end in that place, maybe substituting Jews for a different minority group, then you need to be aware of that.
It's worth noting the links between modern trumpers and pre-ww2 american nazi groups such as the german-american bund
also the ties between american industrialists and nazis, the ties between american industrialists and evangelicals and the ties between nazis, crow, eugenics, the Confederacy and flag worship
The ancestry of modern fascism is a family vine that's fairly easiy traceable
Nazis & Communists both came from populist movements and were a good idea....until they weren't. And by then it was too late.
The history lesson is to not permit ANY government access to ANY tools which could be used to suppress the masses. Governments always consolidate power and will vigorously protect that power, including turning against their own citizens.
All well and good,
But
Had Rite Aid been seeling back or adding to training sets for other facial recognition systems. Submitting what is now known to be false data, poisoning any sets it went into.
No ruling on that? So this may well occur again in the future because of the actions of rite aid now.
I bet you all know where this is going based on the subject!
I wonder how difficult it would be, strictly for educational purposes of course, to feed facial images of the company management into such a system. If politicians were fed into it, it might provide insight into what it takes to get images removed and just how quickly it can be done. This would be important information to have if suing the operators of the system for negligent libel.
From the FTC blog: "Rite Aid’s facial recognition technology told employees that just one pictured person had entered more than 130 Rite Aid locations from coast to coast more than 900 times in less than a week."
That might have told them that the system was flawed, supposing anyone was paying attention.
I ended up going down the rabbit hole on this topic and found an interesting example of this feature being used well
https://www.conveniencestore.co.uk/your-stories/how-i-used-ai-technology-to-stop-15-shoplifters-in-two-weeks/664383.article
I thought this was a great way to manage it, i.e. waiting at the tills by the exit until you stop the shoplifter