Re: Axis nations
Yeah, that read weird to me as well. I assume the issue is that in the West "Allied" doesn't mean merely allied, but is strongly associated with "us good guys" (because WWII), and Axis likewise doesn't mean just "some cooperating countries", but also "those bad guys" (cf WWII again). How can (or why are) we - as targets of a pro-Russian DDos crew - be an "Axis"?
So if you are talking about Russia and those cooperating with it, "allies" would be correct but might confuse us western readers; but calling the crew's targets the "Allies" would be even worse (why are they targetting allies??). So they (the writer) used "axis" instead, trying to use the "otherness" implication of axis, but starting from a Russian point of view. I.e. that if we might say "The Marvellous UK and her Wonderful Allies" and "That Axis of Problematic Countries Opposed to us"; then *they* might perhaps say "Our Great Russian Nation and our Allies" and "That Inconvenient UK and its Axis of Nuisances".
Bah humbug, I've now spent too long thinking about this, and failed to be as clear as I would like. Why couldn't they just say "target"? Much clearer and without confounding associations.