Re: License
I'm a bit puzzled how US lawmakers could attempt to control an idea. They all swear fealty to our Constitution which means they should be up to speed on the notion of "abstract idea" as against "concrete reality". But I suppose just as those individuals confuse something like "The Office of the President" with "King, Dictator and/or Fuhrer" its really easy for them to assume that the idea of RISC-V is some concrete reality which can be controlled and sanctioned.
This isn't a new problem. There's a very good reason why encryption standards are "anything but American" -- its not that American's aren't involved in their development but the standards have to be based outside the US to prevent "US lawmakers" from trying to control them and so both inconveniencing everyone and messing them up.
Just imagine the amount of brain power and effort that goes into devising ever more searching sanctions and involved ways to implement them. If we devoted this intellectual effort to actually developing product then we might stand a chance of remaining competitive. But I suppose this is what we get for churning out an endless supply of lawyers rather than some engineers.