I wonder how many potentially great NASA projects and innovations never got funding because they couldn't hack it on the acronym front.
NASA to equip International Space Station with frikkin lasers (for comms)
US space agency NASA plans to run a technology demonstration for space lasers using the International Space Station next month, to test how this could be used to transmit terabytes of data back from science and exploration missions. According to NASA, this demonstration will form the agency's first bi-directional, end-to-end …
COMMENTS
-
-
-
Sunday 29th October 2023 09:17 GMT Bebu
More imagination...
《There was a Crew Rescue Vehicle - Experimental for the Shuttle which allegedly got cancelled because it's acronym was too close to a lady-part for NASA's bosses》
These NASA bosses had more vivid imaginations than mine. Alas, I simply cannot get any specifically female anatomical feature from CRV or CRVES (surely not "curves.") If there were an X involved I might think cervix.
The canned emergency crew return vehicle project's code: X-38 when rotated anticlockwise 90 degrees appears to have a more feasible reference to the more interesting lady parts.
Critical updates for NASA telecommunication services hopefully would suffer an anacronym miscarriage at conception.
Still during the '80s there were legions of IT man(age|gle)ment that proudly proclaimed themselves as management information science managers and were quite happy with the title MISmanager which I suppose had the merit of veracity. When I think of "management information science" it would have to be an oxymoron but cannot see where "oxy" could come into it - bugger all management, even less information and science only if think astrology is.
-
-
-
-
Sunday 29th October 2023 09:31 GMT Bebu
Re: How big?
《 "This optical module is described as being the size of a microwave"
So somewhere between 1mm and 30cm? Not very precise.》
I was thinking the oven so a bit bigger than a cubesat.
I was wondering whether there is any restriction on deploying serious military lasers on orbiting platforms apart from getting enough power(energy) to operate them? While not likely to be of any use against terrestrial targets the absence of air could make such lasers quite effective against assets that spend at least some time above stratosphere. Reagan's star wars project (SDI) might not have been quite as brain dead as he appeared.