back to article LinkedIn lays off nearly 700 staff, engineers to suffer the most

Microsoft is kicking off another round of layoffs, this time cutting 668 jobs across several teams at LinkedIn.  News of the cuts came this morning, which LinkedIn confirmed in a brief blog post that it described to The Register as "full." According to the Microsoft subsidiary, the cuts will range across engineering, product, …

  1. Dan 55 Silver badge
    Devil

    After buying Activision Blizzard for $69bn...

    That money's got to come from somewhere...

    From LinkedIn and the 11000 other employees fired from MS earlier this year...

    1. ecofeco Silver badge

      Re: After buying Activision Blizzard for $69bn...

      Right? Those bad business decisions just don't pay for themselves, you know?! And certainly not from the executive board or shareholders! Why the nerve of such a thought!

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Yeah, buying Activision Blizzard was totally morally justified. What a disgusting company.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Birds of a feather?

      I mean other than merging with Uber who would have been a closer fit?

      1. CrazyOldCatMan Silver badge

        Re: Birds of a feather?

        I mean other than merging with Uber who would have been a closer fit?

        Tesla/SpaceX..

  3. Kevin McMurtrie Silver badge

    Stability inversion

    I've noticed recently that startups appear to be looking more stable when job hunting. They have 2 to 4 years of funding and a long-term vision. Public companies are scratching around for quick share price profits like drug addicts. For all the intricate moving parts in a business, all the top of command has for a plan is a profit target.

    Private is even better, but they have stable employees so they're rarely posting job openings.

    1. ecofeco Silver badge

      Re: Stability inversion

      Product improvement and innovation are SO last century.

      Go vulture capitalist or go home!

      (in case anyone forgot that El Reg's mascot is very appropriate in so many ways)

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Stability inversion

      IMO, startups are only more stable at present if that funding is in place and 100% committed - and stable only for as long as that funding will last.

      With the increase in interest rates across the world over the last year, VC funding is on the decrease as it becomes more attractive to bank your cash and get a guaranteed return than to gamble on funding startups. When bank rates were close to 0%, there was more incentive to invest in a startup.

    3. Korev Silver badge
      Boffin

      Re: Stability inversion

      A friend joined a biotech startup that was supposed to be stable, in less than three months he was one of the 30% of the staff laid off... A couple of buildings down the street, another biotech is currently firing ~50% of their staff...

      1. ecofeco Silver badge

        Re: Stability inversion

        I've watched biotech companies come and go for 20 years.

        They seem the most volatile of all the tech bro companies.

  4. druck Silver badge

    AI is completely adequate...

    ...to drive the low quality spamfest that Linked In is now, so who needs employees.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Shh, don't teach the bots

      about enshitification.

      That's one of the five skills of the apocalypse. Bad enough that management knows about it already.

    2. IGotOut Silver badge

      Re: AI is completely adequate...

      "the low quality spamfest that Linked In is now"

      Now? It's always been nothing but recruitment agencies and Management Consultants wanking over "inspirational" quotes by other Management Consultants

  5. ecofeco Silver badge

    No surprise

    I'm STILL trying to figure out what value LinkedIn brings to me. Besides just another place to post my resume.

    Networking? Nope. Not for me. Unless you count a ton of 2nd rate headhunter's spam. Learning? Nothing I can't get somewhere cheaper to free. Job listings? Again what do they do better than Monster or Dice, et al? And that's a pretty low bar right there.

    More than anything, it's just become another waste of time chore that I only keep around because some future employer can't be arsed to actually read a resume I submit or thinks not having a presence is somehow suspect.

    But one thing is for sure, laying off your engineers is always a good way to improve the user experience!

    Oh wait...

    1. Phil O'Sophical Silver badge

      Re: No surprise

      It's a convenient self-updating address book, not much more. At least having no R&D will help with "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".

    2. Steve Button Silver badge

      Re: No surprise

      I've been thinking about this for years. It felt like the right thing to do, because I'm a contractor and need to "keep my profile out there", but really I'm not sure it benefits me at all. Also, it's a massive time sink. I found myself getting into long running arguments (usually about Covid measures, and "masks and lockdowns don't work" / "Yes they DO work" / "No they don't" back-and-forth) which I'm sure didn't help to raise my professional profile one little bit.

      Also, LinkedIN is a goldmine. Just not a goldmine for me. For recruiters to try to find new companies (not candidates so much) and also for hackers to gain information for Spear Fishing. So, it's a security nightmare.

      And because of that I'm no longer on there any more. And I don't miss it. I feel sorry for those engineers who will be out looking for work, but I'm sure they'll find something more interesting and worthwhile.

  6. Denarius Silver badge

    Coming Soon

    Calls for more Green Cards.

    Coming After: More calls from pollies for people to spend to stop economy from collapsing.

    So glad I dropped Linked* when M$ bought it. Waste of time anyway

  7. TM™
    Devil

    Big tech is a monopsony and appear to be working in concert.

    The west's race to the bottom on education has produced a massive shortage of skilled people - especially in IT.

    With this massive upward pressure on wages how else is big tech going to reduce the cost of employing minions?

    Treat em mean keep em keen.

  8. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "Layoffs will continue until profit improves"

    Just for once, I'd love to see a statement that says "Hiring will continue until quality improves".

  9. Knightlie

    "None of that really matters, though, because Wall Street approves. Microsoft's share prices were generally unaffected after it announced its IRS bill last week, and jumped today on news of the LinkedIn layoffs."

    Poor people* are suffering, yay!

    * Poorer than "Wall Street," anyway.

  10. s. pam
    Mushroom

    Great stuff, more redundant people to compete against

    I’m really starting to despair when I hear the words “Layoffs will continue until profit improves” as it’s an excuse for “ we’re completely useless managing the company so you get the sack”

    1. Steve Button Silver badge

      Re: Great stuff, more redundant people to compete against

      So, go and run your own company and see if you can do a better job.

      They don't owe you a job, it's a free market economy. If things are going bad they have to cut back, or go bust.

      I've worked for many companies over the years, and honestly the middle management struggle to be an umbrella and shield the minions from all the shit from above, the upper management usually have literally no clue what's going on at the coal face, and are more concerned these days with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. If a company does well, it's often because the greater market happens to be doing well. What the upper management aren't going to do is to sack themselves. Unless they are Gerald Ratner, or stick their foot in their own mouth in a particularly spectacular fashion.

      Deal with it, do the best job you can while you are there, and try to enjoy yourself doing something interesting and getting paid for it if you possibly can. And be thankful that you are lucky enough to have landed on your feet, rather than someone beeping bar codes in Tesco. Work to Live, don't Live to Work.

      1. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Great stuff, more redundant people to compete against

        Every point you make in this post is contradictory. I assume it is all satire.

        1. Steve Button Silver badge

          Re: Great stuff, more redundant people to compete against

          Not every point, but I can see it's a bit self contradictory. And a bit satirical.

          I guess the point I'm trying to make is to be stoic, make hay while the sun shines and don't expect too much from upper management. Often the Big Wigs aren't the visionaries they make themselves out to be, they just happened to be in the right place at the right time. Although they do often work very hard (or at least long hours) and they play well at politics. Take Zuckerberg and Musk for instance. Not exactly visionaries, are they? Steve Jobs most definitely was, although by many accounts a complete asshole to work for.

          Some of the best places I've worked at are where the middle manager have taken the trouble to fight for their staff, and shield them from the shitstorm that comes from above. Likewise, some of the worst have been where the managers throw you under the bus.

          If you don't want to be a cog in a great big badly oiled machine, go and set up your own. It's probably harder than you think.

          1. Anonymous Coward
            Anonymous Coward

            Non-compete agreements

            They will sue you out of existence before you can even start. Even with actual laws changing, they can just go full scientology and use frivolous lawsuits to attempt to drain your wallet anyway.

  11. DJV Silver badge

    the cuts will range across engineering, product, talent, and finance teams

    Wait, are you telling me they employ people with TALENT? Obviously, none of them ever reached management level.

    1. Dan 55 Silver badge

      Re: the cuts will range across engineering, product, talent, and finance teams

      No need for any talent in management.

  12. cmdrklarg
    Megaphone

    For FSM's sake

    Please stop calling slightly smaller profits a "loss".

    Having a profit of $99 billion this year when you had a $100 billion last year is not a loss!

    1. ecofeco Silver badge

      Re: For FSM's sake

      When your privilege is eroded even just a tiny nit, it mostly certainly IS a loss! To view it any other way is just crazy commie talk! /s

  13. IGotOut Silver badge

    Please explain....

    ...WTF is a "Talent Team".

    Oh forgot. LinkedIn. Buzzword Bullshit 101.

  14. JWLong

    Linkedin

    ............nothing but a Large pile of SHIT!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like