What's wrong with blu-ray?
It's cheap and easily available. Sure 100Gb on a two sided disk isn't much these days, but a it'll cover many mostly-linear data sets - especially in one of those massive switchers....
China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has issued a revised "Action Plan for the High-Quality Development of Computing Infrastructure" that emphasizes increased deployment of edge computing and the low-latency networks that make it possible. The plan, published on Monday, sets goals for the state of China's …
as a non-expert, I'd suggest "blue-sky". After all the UK government talks about this all the time - "Dear researchers, please produce some unique and potentially valuable 'blue sky' research outcomes so we can refuse to invest in it and sell the idea to another state ... like China"
> Maybe it's time to think again about Blu-ray?
Maybe they are looking to make their own version of ODA?
You have to archive to something, either LTO tape, ODA or Bluray. There is nothing else at this time.
RDX doesn't count it's a HDD buffed up to survive a drop.
Also, in a modern IT environment you have to have read only options. Not all secure data is allowed on re-writable media where I work. Plenty of customers are still asking for 50GB or more of data burned onto DVD single layer, simply because it's R/O.
I'm trying to let them know that dual layer exists and if they invest on a USB bluray drive we can send them one disc instead.
The wife and I often borrow disc copies of movies we missed, or Noir we
never knew existed, from the local library. Often DVD, but since a
DVD/BluRay player cost very little more than just DVD, we got that.
Since BluRay is considered a failed technologt, the demand/wait-list for
any given film is lower for the BluRay version.
Plus, of course, some of the "extras" on the BluRay version actually add
at least a bit of info.
Yes, of course I understand that the player is probably mining my whole
LAN for data it can sell, but then, so are the TVs and appliances.