back to article Microsoft kills classic Azure DaaS, because it isn't really Azure

Microsoft will deprecate the classic edition of its Azure Virtual Desktop desktop-as-a-service (DaaS) and has given customers three years to keep using the service before they'll need to find an alternative. The software giant seems to have spent years trying to confuse cloudy DaaS users, as it has offered two products called …

  1. Dan 55 Silver badge
    WTF?

    What?

    It seems MS been inspired by Google lately.

  2. Sir Sham Cad

    Confuse and conquer

    It must be so much fun being a Microsoft Channel Partner. Since the customers can't keep up with the changes it's Professional Services Pork for all.

  3. aerogems Silver badge
    Mushroom

    Marking my place

    I'm betting in three years there will be no shortage of companies scrambling to try to find an alternative, despite having had three years notice.

    1. Zippy´s Sausage Factory

      Re: Marking my place

      Plus the slew of companies saying Micros~1 doesn't offer the same service and theirs is pretty much a drop in replacement. Always dangerous to shut down services, gives your competitors a chance.

    2. BeaglesDragoon

      Re: Marking my place

      The alternative IS Azure Virtual Desktop… it’s just the old classic version that’s going, which hasn’t had any new features for years. Anything new (and there’s been a lot) has gone to Azure Virtual Desktop.

      1. aerogems Silver badge

        Re: Marking my place

        You missed the lovely forest because you were so focused on the trees. It doesn't matter if there was literally a drop-in replacement and all companies had to do was click a radio button or something to make the switch, you're going to find a depressing number of them who will wait until the last second to even start on any validation testing they may need to do. I mean, we're already talking about a group of laggards who are using an ancient service.

  4. Michael Strorm Silver badge

    Confusing naming?

    No change there, then.

    MS marketing's modus operandi for decades has been to use the same or very similar names for multiple different things, clearly more interested in leveraging the name recognition for PHB's than any confusion caused to those who actually have to use it.

    Well, that and the equally confusing practice of giving multiple different names to the same thing every time they need a new marketing slant.

    1. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

      Re: Confusing naming?

      Or naming them backwards such as WSL which is a Linux service on Windows.

    2. Dan 55 Silver badge

      Re: Confusing naming?

      This appear to have got worse over the last decade, it actually makes me miss the Microsoft of old.

  5. EricB123 Silver badge

    Say What?

    Microsoft seems to have caught a bad case of the Intels. I've heard that is occasionally curable with masses doses of antibiotics.

    But then there is the problem of antibiotics tolerance. Don't tell the cattle industry this.

  6. phat shantz

    Never thought I'd say this

    In his day, MS was a total Charlie Foxtrot, but even Steve Balmer would blush at such idiocy.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like