back to article OSIRIS-REx successfully delivers NASA's first asteroid sample

NASA's first asteroid sample return mission delivered on Sunday, when the OSIRIS-REx capsule touched down in the Department of Defense's Utah Test and Training Range near Salt Lake City. OSIRIS-REx – full name Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer – flew by the Earth on Sunday …

  1. Big_Boomer
    Alien

    I for one,...

    would like to welcome home a small part of what I saw blast off from the Kennedy Space Center in Sept 2016. Of course I also welcome our new Asteroid Overlords. <LOL>

    1. Paul Herber Silver badge

      Re: I for one,...

      Asteroid Over Lords = AOL.

    2. Jellied Eel Silver badge

      This is my blob!

      Of course I also welcome our new Asteroid Overlords.

      I named him Benny!

      Downside to this landing is we're probably going to have to wait a while for any data or papers. Already rather fascinating though given the landing didn't go quite as expected, ie rather than being solid, it was a ball of grit. So raises interesting prospects for future asteroid mining, if that can be done with space hoovers rather than drilling. But then the challenge of vacuuming in a vacuum. Also fun thinking about the challenges of follow-up missions. So ok, we got this sample, now let's go back and sample the core.. which may take some time.

  2. Winkypop Silver badge
    Trollface

    Typical delivery courier

    Sorry I can’t give you an exact drop off time and your parcel will be (checks clipboard…) somewhere in Utah.

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Typical delivery courier

      You weren't home, so we left the package with your neighbour... Alpha Centauri.

      1. Mooseman

        Re: Typical delivery courier

        "left the package with your neighbour... Alpha Centauri"

        Is that in the same place as the planning notifications department?

      2. Michael H.F. Wilkinson Silver badge
        Coat

        Re: Typical delivery courier

        with the small furry creatures (who some say aren't REAL small furry creatures anymore, not like when they were young)?

        I'll get me coat

  3. Neil Barnes Silver badge
    Coat

    11mph (18km/h)

    Also known as 5m/s in proper units.

    Slightly faster than my emergency chute is rated to land me :)

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: 11mph (18km/h)

      I'm surprised by that - not disputing it, I'm just surprised. A quick calculation (using a web site so it's probably wrong) said 5m/s is equivalent to jumping from 1.3m. I'd expect and emergency chute to be much harsher than that.

      1. imanidiot Silver badge

        Re: 11mph (18km/h)

        If Mr. Barnes is a fairly light individual that might well be true. The MarS emergency chute I often fly with (in a glider) is rated for 5.5 m/s at 100kg pilot weight iirc. At 120kg pilot weight it'll come down at 7 m/s. Extrapolating backwards an 80 kg individual would probably be coming down at around 3,5 to 4 m/s (decent speed doesn't quite scale linearly)

        1. Neil Barnes Silver badge

          Re: 11mph (18km/h)

          Mr Barnes is sadly on the cusp of requiring a smaller wing (he doesn't want to spend the cash until this one's all worn out) but by chute is supposed to land me at 4.5m/s - at ten kilos more than I weigh.

        2. Sam not the Viking Silver badge

          Re: 11mph (18km/h)

          I hope Mr. Barnes stays decent and never needs to verify this prediction.

          There's something deeply worrying about the phrase 'Terminal Velocity'. I understand some east-Europe 'disruptors' were more familiar with the detail.

      2. jdiebdhidbsusbvwbsidnsoskebid Silver badge

        Re: 11mph (18km/h)

        "A quick calculation (using a web site so it's probably wrong) said 5m/s is equivalent to jumping from 1.3m. I'd expect and emergency chute to be much harsher than that."

        My own quick calculation (using my memory, pen, paper and calculator) comes up with the same result.

        V^2 = u^2 +2as

        u= starting velocity=0

        a=acceleration due to gravity=9.81

        v=final velocity

        s distance travelled

        Set v=5, rearrange for s and you get distance=1.3m to 1 decimal place. This ignores air resistance, which you probably shouldn't do in any decision to actually use a parachute.

    2. Sgt_Oddball
      Headmaster

      Re: 11mph (18km/h)

      No, I'm not having that at all...

      The true conversion should be 0.0002%mvsv (Maximum Velocity of a Sheep in a Vacuum).

      I mean what's the point of a standards bureau if no one sticks to the correct standards?

  4. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    One small gripe with the general coverage of this mission.

    The Reg sums it up with this sentence "It then spent two more years studying the asteroid's surface to identify optimal landing and sample collection points."

    It spent two years there studying the asteroid, but it wasn't just figuring out where to land. It spent that time doing all kids of scientific studies of the asteroid with lots of on-board instruments. The sample grabbing part didn't just need the surface to be mapped first, it was also the riskiest thing to do, so left until the end of the mission.

  5. Ian Johnston Silver badge

    Meanwhile, religion worries about pronouns.

  6. Doctor Syntax Silver badge

    "it could potentially have these organic building blocks that started life here on Earth"

    I suppose everyone's forgotten the Miller Urey experiment that told us there's no need to throw the problem over the panspermia wall.

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    "OSIRIS-REx capsule in Utah dessert"

    It's that black cherry on top, right?

    Voilà -- fully le succès!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like