"a very highly resistive poor quality material"
I wonder what pushed those guys at the Quantum Energy Research Centre in Seoul to publish something that wrong.
Is this a case of they were genuinely convinced their data was good and made a mistake, or is it that they just wanted their names in the papers ?
Because they had to know that such a claim would be verified, and after the cold fusion scandal, there is no chance that they could just do a "you're trying it wrong" and get away with it.
Now they're not supplying the samples they promised. Another bad mark on this so-called research center.
I don't know if they're ever going to "find" anything or anything else, but if they do, they'd better find somebody else's name to put on the paper, because theirs is burned for all eternity (well, at least until the Internet dies).