Fujitsu admits it fluffed the fix for Japan’s flaky ID card scheme Fujitsu Japan is in the spotlight again for all the wrong reasons, after fumbling its attempt to fix the nation's troubled ID card scheme. Drone flying over city at sunset Japan Post closer to replacing snail mail with autonomous drones READ MORE The scheme, called My Number, aims to provide every resident with a digital ID …
On the Japanese telly a couple of days ago they had an article about the latest issue - places, even within the same town, can have the same name, or the same kanji but different pronunciation, or people have different ways of writing their address - 1-2-3-4 is actually identical to 一丁目二の三番四号, but the database requires an exact match. One could use the post code which would eliminate 99% of these ambiguities, but the My Number system does not include post codes for whatever reason.
Yes, I was facepalming that they only just realised this, and it will take them another two years to hook up to some master database of official addresses, although that doesn't address the other issue of needing fuzzy matches.
1-2-3-4 is actually identical to 一丁目二の三番四号
Did you perhaps mean to write, "equivalent" instead of "identical"? I recognize "一二三四" as the series of digits, "1","2","3","4", but what did the other characters mean in that context?
It seems they need a way to reduce such kanjified numeric strings down to a canonical form, if sending a letter to an address, using the canonical numeric form, would result in delivery of the letter to the correct dwelling.
It's the equivalent of saying that some people write "Bethlehem District, Albany City, New York State", and some people write "Bethlehem, Albany, New York", but they are literally different, but the database requires them to be functionally identical.
一丁目二の三番四号 essentially means District 1, Block 2, sub-block 3, Building 4. Many people don't write district 1, block blah blah, they'll just write (and say) "I live at 1,2,3,4." The database requires 1,2,3,4 to be functionally identical to block blah blah. (See link.)
This is another example of governments trying to be fancy and ust making things more complicated and expensive for zero gain.
Take public transport in any city, stupid ticketting systems costing billions that dont actually make any money. In fact by scaring away the public and slowing people entering and leaving buses and trains, they are actually diverting people to cars. Cars which require roads and tunnels which cost billions far more than the lousy few millions they make from tickets.
Yup thats genius, requiring people to use a digital identity car for free public health. Why bother.
Stayed at a motorhome "aire" which required passport number plus email to enter. Ok, maybe a know your customer requirement. But thenrequiring a further trip to the login terminal to get a barcode id to empty your poo. Is there really a problem with pirate poo dumpers?
" Whose poo is it anyway?"
When I worked for Fujitsu in the UK I worked with many skilled, dedicated people doing excellent work of high quality, much of which keeps the country ticking quietly. Unfortunately these islands of competence were surrounded by oceans of fuckwits delivering malevolent screw-ups like Horizon.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
