In a hundred years...
.... this may be a treasured item in a museum, viewed by people who routinely carry a low-cost device that measures their personal speed through time with far more accuracy.
There's a new atomic clock on the block over at the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and while it's not as accurate as its predecessors it does have one big advantage: it's small enough to stick in your pocket. The chip-scale beam clock (CSBC) is tiny – just around the size of a postage stamp – and it …
"carry a low-cost device that measures their personal speed through time with far more accuracy."
Won't happen. 2 reasons: Price and physics.
Unless someone invents new physics related to measuring time and it doesn't cost anything. That doesn't happen very often.
"the size of a postage stamp"
You need a new comparator, dear Vultures.
Your under-35 readership will be wondering "What is this 'postage stamp' thing to which they refer? How big might they be?" because they have never posted or received a letter in their young lives.
Mostly, they conduct all their business transactions by phone, SMS, online messenger app, email or web-form.
On the rare occasion they need to send a physical item, they use a package/courier service.
Sorry, the "postage stamp" days are nearly gone
I'm disappointed the article is continuing to use "postage stamp" as a measurement of size, rather than using the correct standard, which as any fule kno, is the nanoWales for area - https://www.theregister.com/Design/page/reg-standards-converter.html - or grapefruit for volume.
Probably because, at the current rate of postage stamp price inflation, a basic phone which can send SMS and which has an online messenger app on it will soon cost less than a postage stamp.
In unrelated news, I found out, after a conversation with my postie, that my local Royal Mail delivery office is both short-staffed and has a hiring freeze on, which explains why ten days worth of post arrived in one bundle at once. All that money is going somewhere, could it possibly be that privatisation was only a good idea for those who got a slice of the pie?