Google warns its own employees: Do not use code generated by Bard Google has warned its own employees not to disclose confidential information or use the code generated by its AI chatbot, Bard. The policy isn't surprising, given the Chocolate Factory also advised users not to include sensitive information in their conversations with Bard in an updated privacy notice. Other large firms have …
But wants the job split up amongst multiple agencies.
Translation: if it is all in one agency there's a chance they might actually regulate us, so we want to hamstring them by splitting things up so we can get them fighting turf battles among each other and leave us in peace to create Skynet.
Google does not want a federal AI agencyBut wants the job split up amongst multiple agencies.
Translation: if it is all in one agency there's a chance they might actually regulate us, so we want to hamstring them by splitting things up so we can get them fighting turf battles among each other and leave us in peace to create Skynet. ..... DS999
What part of ...... AI is not able to be remotely regulated by foreign third parties/federated regulatory agencies ...... do foreign third parties/federated regulatory agencies not understand?
And do you realise the more news of what is proposed to be of major concern to foreign third parties, and the defences to be exercised, the greater the fine tuning of possible, extremely effective and indefensible retaliatory measures are being gleaned by and/or supplied to SMARTR AI Systems and Large Language Model Learning Machinery ?
The UK already did that and it is more reasonable than creating broad laws. Regulation of Medical AI-based health recommendations is indeed much different than AI-based credit checks. One is great the other is deplorable.
The UK is creating a global set of guidelines that reach agency will then use to draft laws. It's a sensible approach regardless of what Microsoft says.
The UK is creating a global set of guidelines that reach agency will then use to draft laws. It's a sensible approach regardless of what Microsoft says. ....... v13
Here's a sobering sad tale of the UK's ability to create and do anything novel successfully .... and from somebody who surely knows what he's talking about/where all the skeletons lie ....... https://dominiccummings.substack.com/p/3-the-startup-party-reflections-on
> Do not use code generated by Bard
Clearly, we need a new phrase to mean the opposite of "eat your own dogfood", which can be easily explained to Joe Public.
Something that gets across the idea that this is the sort of advice usually given to writers of deliberate malware.
So far I've not come up with any candidates, but place my trust in fellow commentards. Is there an existing well-known phrase I'm ignorant of?
In other words, all the hyped-up claims for AI bots are overblown nonsense, they're nowhere near ready to take over our jobs, not worth the huge hype, and you'd be a fool to rely on them for anything vaguely important.
But they don't announce this publicly and admit that their own hype is wrong and the many many people who have been saying that for a while are right, just quietly advise their own employees that it's too much of a toy to be used for work.
"Codey" is Google's equivalent of CoPilot, I believe (*I have no personal experience with Codey).
Chat API can answer coding questions verbosely and or with code, but it easily goes off on a tangent. CoPilot fits in as a coding auto completion function and the output is generally short. (It can guess comment completions too).
So the real question should be, does Google encourage it's programmers to use "Codey"?, and I bet the answer is yes.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
