Journalistic integrity?
-> For T-Mobile customers wondering if they were affected, letters were mailed out on April 28, so if you haven't received one you're probably fine.
Is that really good enough? You are writing about a company which failed to protect its customers' data. How about at changing that word 'probably' to something a little less positive? How about a little more skepticism when it it comes to these repeated data breaches? Where is the indignation? You are letting T-Mobile off the hook far too lightly.
The article reads almost like a press release. 'T-Mobile has had tens of millions of customer records compromised over the years.' I could write that Mars has sold tens of millions of Mars bars over the years. Both are true statements, but one is negative and the other positive. Come one, el Reg.