Monetising nothing, the last refuge of Neo-liberal economics?
"In March, ... Rishi Sunak announced plans for the UK to become a science and technology superpower by 2030, ..."
In what respect can NFTs be called assets? How do they contribute to ambition to become a "technology superpower"?
NFTs are merely yet another means for taking money off fools. Whilst not against pillaging the purses of people who have more money than sense, this doesn't appear a good use of the mediocre brainpower to be found in and around government.
'Financialisation' is the watchword for Neo-liberal economics, which has arisen following adoption in the 80s of Hayek's economic hypothesis. Institutions like the City of London were let loose to create a fairy tale collection of assets known as 'derivatives'; for instance, there nominally is far more paper gold than physical gold.
Hand in hand with wholly fiat currencies introduced in 1971, by what could be called an act of fiat by the USA (as in 'Fiat lux'), precarious value has been attached to fantasy money conjured up on demand. The 'City' has become a major component of the UK economy, that is, as measured by the questionably helpful index known as GDP (formerly GNP).
The City is on a pedestal. Its denizens, almost exclusively mere employees of shareholders in banks and other financial institutions (these complemented by wholly parasitical entities such as hedge funds) rather than entrepreneurs with their own assets at stake. Huge fiat 'assets' are passed around, each recipient taking a cut before sending them onwards, and toxic debt is packaged for sale to naive buyers. 'Fiat profit' seeps out as shareholder dividends and executive 'compensation' (for what?) plus bonuses.
As soon as feasible, the executive wage component is converted into tangible assets such as physical properties, fine arts (plus the kind of rubbish found in Tate Modern), luxury goods, and so forth; recipients of this cash whilst knaves are not fools, they know they are handling paper of value predicated upon faith by the ignorant; they understand that come an 'emperor's clothes' moment they will retain assets of worth no matter which currency they become negotiable in, and that depression of value relative to other physical assets (as in housing market crashes) will eventually reverse as the economy picks up.
Hayek's hypothesis has been put to the test for circa forty years. It has proven wanting and dangerous too for societies seeking pretence of decency and for inspirational collective goals.
[Released under the Creative Commons Attribution international licence 4.0.]