Atlassian to dump 500 – by email – in the name of 'rebalancing' Atlassian has announced a five percent reduction in its workforce as part of an effort it founders described as a "rebalancing" that will allow the collaboration upstart to focus on its changing priorities. "Today marks a very hard day in our 20-year history," wrote co-founders Mike Cannon-Brookes and Scott Farquharson. "We …
No doubt. Yes, the same could be said about other tech and tools, e.g. cloud.
In any case, I might add a corollary to your statement: it's not only about the tool, it's also how it is sold to the unwitting users.
If Atlassian (et al) sell Jira as a panacea, when the tool by itself is no such thing (it's also how you use it), that's a bit shady. Though hardly surprising, cloud and some *aaS vendors use the same sales tactics.
I am admittedly biased: across a handful of companies and groups I have yet to see Jira used well and actually improve productivity. Rather the reverse, in a couple instances. I have, however, consistently heard wondrous tales of how Jira (and Confluence etc.) will dramatically fix all of the department's woes....
That's a very low bar. Try just about any decent FOSS Wiki and you'll see how bad Confluence (especially the "improved" SaaS version) really is. These ate the guys who can't even work out how to implement a definition list. Check the features of something like DokuWiki and the plug-ins available.
I'll grant it's possible to craft some very pretty pages with Confluence, if you work at it a bit -- I've seen some nice ones at last $job. I'm not experienced enough to know if it's as quick & easy to make basic documentation pages vs. e.g. your common wiki tools.
However, to say it's "better than Sharepoint" seems like comparing somewhat different things. I'm admittedly no sort of expert with Microsoft products, but I thought Sharepoint was more of a revision control system of sorts, and file sharing repository, rather than document creation. No?
E.g. I recall various project managers and others sending around "sharepoint links" to their spreadsheets and slide decks and whatnot; my assumption is those things were created in the corresponding MS product (presumably excel and powerpoint) rather than in sharepoint itself.
All that aside, the people responsible for such things at $company announced that Jira + Confluence would be the best new shiny, but there didn't appear to be significant improvements over the popular opensrc equivalent wiki and bug tracking tools. In fact, as time went on, some groups simply didn't bother with atlassian wares and went back to using what they had previously.
Sharepoint also is/was a content management system like WordPress. Like WordPress without addins, it only gives/gave you fairly simple designs for fairly simple content. (I don't know if, like WordPress, there is/was a world of third-party addins).
Like Google Sheets, you could display data in a spreadsheet format, without it being an Excel spreadsheet or an OpenOffice spreadsheet. At the time I used it, that was very limited. For other stuff, you could use an MS office viewer or OpenOffice to view a file. Now I guess you'd use Office 365 instead of sharepoint.
People who have more money to spare than most people will ever see might get more for themselves in some vaguely distant future, and at the "expense" of a mere 500 of the people who have worked to turn their obscenely lage pile of cash into a comically huge pile of cash.
What's not to like? You just celebrate, OK?
It's the second order differential*, but I doubt they're celebrating it. Although they appear to expect that they'll continue making a profit and it's going to be more than last quarter, it won't be as much more than last quarter than last quarter was to the one before that. Investors always seem very surprised when that happens and they freak out quickly.
* I'm guessing what you consider the original function to be. If the original one was the graph of their profit over time, then the first derivative is whether or not it's growing (yes) and the second is how fast it's growing relative to history, which is where their problem lies. If your original graph was something else, the answer could be different.
This post has been deleted by its author
I was always under the impression that getting fired was the result of fscking up badly, yes, I've been fired once, under flimsy circumstances, so the guy who voluntarily left and, I replaced could return when his new job wasn't all peaches and cream. I was also laid off with timely notice when a construction job was winding down, with 26 weeks of unemployment payments from the gov't.
No they arent being generous, they are trying to let the fired staff to finish whatever they were dooing and maybe "teach" the new people their knowledge. Real people know thats not how it works, but leaders dont know jack and have been watching too much bulldust shows.
TFA mentions that Atlassian hired almost 1000 people last quarter. And that's not an isolated thing. Their workforce has more than doubled since the start of the pandemic.
So, basically they've just grown the workforce too fast.
Why they don't just stop hiring for a few months, rather than laying off existing staff, is left as an exercise for the cynic.
Not sure if you are being serious, but replacing experience with new people isnt an equal replacement.
Anybody can read code, the problem is most code is a total mess, and only time teaches you more and more of the details that are all over the place.
Its like driving without google maps... if its your home area, you know the place, where this or that shop is, or where the best shortcut is to walk to the park. If you are new you just dont know these things.
Well of course that exchange is a net loss, any of us who've been in workforce for more than a season or two can see that.
However, that knowledge and experience is generally extracted and promptly disposed of when joining the management ranks.
Alternately, they inject a thick layer of willful ignorance and denial skills to the new drone, in order to cover up any uncomfortable use or demonstration of common sense, logic or reason.
Managers aren't born, they're made. Unfortunately often from the cheapest possible stock, and customized to suit any organizational dysfunction or toxicity as needed.
Try explaining that to the big wheel executives making the decisions, or the beancounters advising them.
To some of them, "experienced" merely translates to "old, expensive", and maybe also "smarter than me", which they don't like very much but would never admit out loud.
To the worst of them, this "code" you're talking about sounds like Charlie Brown's school teacher, and they've heard that the younger generation is really good at it anyway, so you old grey beards and your big salaries can go find something else to do.
《"Talent Acquisition, Program Management, and Research & Insights" teams will feel the deepest cuts.》
One might wonder whether the B-Ark is embarking its passengers.
Of course ultimately the remaining inhabitants of Golgafrincham perished from a disease contracted from infected phones.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
