Re: Perceptiveness
"I think AMD with Zen 3 have put a lot of pressure on Intel, in some ways Intel probably needs to discontinue their bottom-end processor ranges..."
I doubt it. AMD's lower-end CPUs aren't that plentiful, whereas the former Celerons can be found anywhere you want them. For many cases, this isn't that interesting, but it does mean that Intel can get almost total market share in low-power, cheap CPUs that can run Windows and generic X86 Linux. Not only can you get a bunch of cheap small desktops using such chips, but they're also very popular for people building custom systems that use an AMD64 processor as the main chip but don't need fast performance. They're also capable for basic desktop use (as long as you're careful not to skimp on the RAM as well if you're running Windows), which can open an area of cheap computers for users that don't need too much.
In fact, the higher-end Intel parts are the ones that interest me less. Sure, a 24-core chip with heterogeneous core types can get some nice benchmark numbers and would probably be nice for parallelized compile runs, but I don't spend much of my day doing those and the rest of the time, the chip consumes a lot of power. They're also quite expensive. I bet they sell more chips like the Pentium N6005 than the I9-13900K.