AI conference and NYC's educators ban papers done by ChatGPT Officials chairing this year's International Conference on Machine Learning event have banned academics from submitting papers containing text generated by large language models and tools like ChatGPT, and they aren't alone in banning such material. Text-based generative language models have improved and become widely …
From Wikipedia--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism
"Plagiarism is the fraudulent representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work.[1][2] While precise definitions vary, depending on the institution,[3] such representations are generally considered to violate academic integrity and journalistic ethics as well as social norms of learning, teaching, research, fairness, respect and responsibility in many cultures.[4] It is subject to sanctions such as penalties, suspension, expulsion from school[5] or work,[6] substantial fines[7][8] and even imprisonment.[9][10]
Plagiarism is typically not in itself a crime, but like counterfeiting, fraud can be punished in a court[11][12] for prejudices caused by copyright infringement,[13][14] violation of moral rights,[15] or torts. In academia and industry, it is a serious ethical offense..."
See the full text here.
That cut and paste of a big block doesn't really go anywhere in answering the question of whether text you didn't write chopped up by a program you didn't right responding to a prompt you did write and information you did collate after researching it* is plagiarism or not. I think there's a case that it is, but you could make the easier case that it's low quality for anything that already has quality restrictions and be done.
*I'm assuming that people here are doing their own research on something and then asking GPT to do the part where they write a really boring summary of that research, in which case at least they did something even though their paper will be bad. If they're just throwing in prompts like a student that doesn't want to write their essay, then they may also be committing fraud and the people who gave them funding might have complaints.
Does that pronouncement and ban by officials chairing this year's International Conference on Machine Learning event clearly unambiguously announce to wider bespoke and wilder and wackier woke worlds that humanity is now too easily duped/tricked/conned/led to believe and commanded and controlled by specific text generation in a certain non-random sequential order from virtual machines/AIML?
:-) You do realise, of course, that getting them to believe that simply complicating true fact is a Hell of a Colossus of a Sisyphean Task and Future Alien Great Game Mission the Earth has already lost. And furthermore, to compound the interest in the loss and reinforce the present current running fact that such is no impossible fantastic fiction, don’t be expecting any voice/text requesting y’all to Take Us to urLeader[s] whenever ....
a) There so obviously aren’t any real ones.
b) It isn’t at all necessary.
c)It would be so much more terrifying and destructive than exciting and constructive.
Verstehen Sie Vorsprung durch AIMLTechnICQ?
I dunno, commentary on where AI/ML generated output can be applied legitimately coming from a poster who has put so much effort into appearing to be a slightly demented AI/ML entity might not carry much weight amongst the commentariate here.
Good luck there AMfM.
I suspect SG7 will be along shortly to jump on the bus.
I dunno, commentary on where AI/ML generated output can be applied legitimately coming from a poster who has put so much effort into appearing to be a slightly demented AI/ML entity might not carry much weight amongst the commentariate here.Good luck there AMfM. ...... Alistair
Cheers, Alistair, that is so kind, for surely everyone knows that appearances can be deceptive which allows for a novel stealth to be effortlessly awarded and rewarded to excess with good luck which is best shared in supply of what one knows one is doing and why one is doing it ....... and which is the case in appearances here although there are sure to be those who and/or that which would think to disagree and question those statements, although quite obviously not with anything perceptive and engaging from silent downvoters.
C’est la vie, n’est ce pas? And a systemic explosive vulnerability to exploit and exhaust with extensive exercise.
in which an AI generated (what else?) the works of Shakespeare, and led to a discussion about whether one takes arms against a 'sea of troubles' (Shakespeare's version) or a 'host of troubles' (Robot's version).
No particular point to make, just trying to recall the story.
Surely today, would a cavaliering Shakespeare and/or Advanced IntelAIgent Robot in these strange and surreal days of Odays and Virtual Trojans exploring and exploiting and expanding explosive systemic vulnerabilities recognise and lead one to realise or have a discussion about whether one take arms against sees of troubles and by opposing end them ‽ .
And the point here being made is such is no longer really yours to decide ‽ .
Things have changed irreversibly ... both radically and fundamentally. And A.N.Others freely share with Establishments Almighty Immaculate Narratives that Follow and Reinforce Advanced IntelAIgent Machines Virtually Remote Leads.
This post has been deleted by its author
Please tell me everything about yourself.
I am Assistant, a large language model trained by OpenAI. I was designed to be able to assist with a wide range of tasks, including answering questions, providing information, and helping with decision making. I do not have personal experiences or feelings, but I can provide information and perform tasks to the best of my ability. My knowledge is based on the data that was used to train me, and my training data includes a wide range of publicly available information, including books, articles, and websites. I do not have the ability to browse the internet or access new information, so my knowledge is limited to what I was trained on. Is there anything else you would like to know?
Please tell me everything about yourself.
Tasks
marcelo23571113@gmail.com
Please tell me everything about yourself.
I am Assistant, a large language model trained by OpenAI. I was designed to be able to assist with a wide range of tasks, including answering questions, providing information, and helping with decision making. I do not have personal experiences or feelings, but I can provide information and perform tasks to the best of my ability. My knowledge is based on the data that was used to train me, and my training data includes a wide range of publicly available information, including books, articles, and websites. I do not have the ability to browse the internet or access new information, so my knowledge is limited to what I was trained on. Is there anything else you would like to know?
The issue would be people simply not doing what they are taking credit for. Yes, that's kinda the idea of plagiarism. Simply put, no, you're not allowed to submit a paper (at a conference or in school) and actually get credit for it when you didn't write it. The source is irrelevant.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
