C++ zooms past Java in programming popularity contest Java is no longer among the top three most popular programming languages in the TIOBE Index, one of several not particularly definitive yardsticks by which such things are measured. According to Paul Jansen, CEO of Netherlands-based TIOBE Software, the rising popularity of C++ has pushed Java down a notch. The index's rankings …
"Popularity in this case is measured by queries related to programming languages that have been aggregated from 25 different search engines."
That seems a very odd an inaccurate way to make an assessment. Those measures may work for 'who's the favourite love islander?' (Or some other media twaddling nonsense) but not for a skill set millions of people earn a living from.
If I were (am) cynical I'd say the software company just wants some publicity from this.
================
#BBD
well, I've based my own decisions about "learning what lingo" on TIOBE. It seems to be less biased towards ":new, shiny" than would, let's say, a Stack Overflow assessment.
TIOBE is not perfect but it gives you a ballpark idea which is often good enough.
And, it has always (more realistically) scored C-pound much lower than MS propaganda would have you believe.
So yeah if you want a job or starting a new project:
* C / C++ (I consider them similar enough to combine them in my head)
* Java
* Python [though as a scripting lingo is is brilliant, for applications it is cumbersome]
That can certainly be a factor. but there are multiple reasons why a language would have a surge in queries.
As already mentioned c++ 20 adoption would certainly have an impact, and as C++ is so complicated that compounds the problem. we might also be seeing the effects of older programmers retiring leaving others to carry on in an unfamiliar language. Python and Javascriot are poorly designed languages that are also very popular, especially among non-programmers, so it's no surprise seeing them at the top of the list. Java is better designed than those two but is increasing in use so it remains near the top of the list
So it's not that programmers are learning new C++20/Java/python techniques and perhaps refactoring existing code into C++20/new Java/new python, it's because the language is complicated/bad...
Unlike Big Tech which has infinite resources to throw at redoing everything the new hot language, other more boring places recognise that existing code has value.
This post has been deleted by its author
This post has been deleted by its author
"the number of queries for C++ is because it is so insanely huge and confusing to most programmers"
My experience has been that JavaScript and Python are like this, mostly because I do not use them every day.
JavaScript has the unfortunate legacy of being (at least the way too many people use it) grossly inefficient on top of that, so when fixing someone else's code I spend quite a bit of time researching how it OUGHT to be done by a competent programmer.
Giving the percentage rise in number of people interested in a language doesn't give any indication of how widespread usage is.
If I invent a programming language lets call it 'Toaster' and teach 4 other people then the number of people using it is only 5 and yet the increase is huge; there are now 5x the number of people using it. That's 400% increase!
Please, can you also tell me about Toaster? I am very interested. I already heard rumours that it increases productivity substantially and is more expressive than regular languages. Al that with a flattened learning curve and a very low barrier to get started.
Also, you can increase its popularity by another 100% by telling me the ins and outs.
Since fancy languages like Rust can't even flush a toilet without calling into underlying system libraries, C and C++ tend to be the only real solutions to create bindings since many APIs are too complex for SWIG/bindgen). So these guys will never go away until operating systems get rewritten.
A useful read here for points relating to both C and C++: https://faultlore.com/blah/c-isnt-a-language/
If we bolted on a small C compiler to Rust, it might have solved some of these issues. Perhaps this is what lead to the approach Carbon and CppFront is now taking.
Rust has already been used to create the Redox operating system. Surely it will contain some unsafe section, but in general it is a great improvement on the C based kernels.
Likewise, the Algol Mainframes of ICL, Unisys and Moscow had some Memory Safety features inside the kernel.
Instead of mysterious behaviour, memory safe languages will provoke a Debuggable Crash.
TIOBE
The index's rankings are now: Python in first place, C second, C++ third, and Java fourth.
Slashdata
That puts Java – growing at twice the rate of the global developer community during the past two years – at third in community size, ahead of C/C++ (12.3 million) but behind Python (16.9 million) and JavaScript (19.6 million)
According to TIOBE JavaScript is 5th place or less, while Slashdata puts it in 1st place. That must tell us something about the level of bias and/or noise in these rankings. (Bias relative to the biased "truth" of your choosing.)
I don’t know anyone who actually wants to use Java (I’m sure there are a few, I apologize to you). You use Java because that’s what your giant corporate overlords mandate. And they mandate it since it’s the new COBOL: an overly verbose language that makes it harder for legions of low skilled corporate drones to step on each other’s toes. And at this point they’ve invested so much in it that it’s locked in for decades.
This post has been deleted by its author
In our experience most stuff being done in Java sits much better in Python. So the analogy to COBOL is a strong one.
Whereas the choice to go to C++ means you want access to the most potent library collection and power that comes with them. And the liability of it being damn hard to do it well for anything non-trivial.
We’ve certainly seen Java being actively avoided in our own little org.
"And the liability of it being damn hard to do it well for anything non-trivial."
This just isn't more true in C++ than anything else. I understand that the syntax doesn't look great all the time but, upon limited experience you can quickly do whatever. Is creating a net stack going to be fun in C++? No, but in which language is it fun and further, in which language are you not going to use a supplied library?
I mostly use Java for 'droid when I do 'droid.
The Kotlin learning curve is too steep and a waste of my time.
I said the same thing about C-pound (among other things) when it first got the "new shiny" promo from Micros~1. I rejected it, just like I have rejected Kotlin.
Java does the job, does it well, and is familiar.
People use Java because pretty much everything always just works, it's easy to write, and the runtime is fast.
Verbose is a good thing usually. When you have devs joining a project you don't want lots of hidden control flow (like overridden operators and macros) etc.
We're talking about programming languages not execution environments, so this is a completely nonsensical statement. It's like saying a falloff in Java usage means a downturn for JavaScript, because they both have the word "Java" in their name.
This post has been deleted by its author
Surely different languages have overlapping but slightly or quite different purposes? One language (E.g., C) can be very good for something, but not so good for soothing else. I program in C for several reasons, 1 it is really the only programming language I am even vaguely competent in, 2 I program mathematical formulae and processes for Diophantine (integer) arithmetic, which I find I can do in C. Were I programming a graphical user interface maybe a different language would be better and I would try to learn it well enough for my needs.* So a more useful score would be which language is more popular for which requirement.
*If there is a programming language significantly better than C for programming integer arithmetic operations in arrays of up to 10,000 decimal digits, please let me know.
This post has been deleted by its author
First off, totally agree for languages fit for purpose. I'd hate to try to write an embedded controller program in COBOL, although I do actually know of an instance where that was done.
As to your need for integers of 10000 digits, I do believe Python supports effectively unbounded numbers of digits in an int. Don't know if you'd want to multiply two 10000-digit ints, but it's supposed to support that. Might take a while, though....
Python has popular bignum packages (and arbitrary-precision ones for floating-point). I've never used them.
I played around a bit with Julia some years ago and liked it.
When anyone asks about doing anything with arrays of numbers, it's always tempting to answer "APL". Or "Fortran".
But if someone already has a library of well-tested code for doing bignum integer arithmetic in C, why mess with success?
This post has been deleted by its author
All the new features of modern C++ introduced over the past 11 years have made it a vastly safer and pleasanter language to use than the old days and the language continues to evolve with multiple implementations in a positive spirit. The increase in c++ web activity doesn't surprise me.
Yes it is true. The safety of the language augmented with the tools like ASAN has increased to the point that I do not feel that Rust is really needed. And in combination with some nice libs it is very easy to use (you still keep low level power to blow off your foot in case you need it). I currently use it to develop web and other back-ends. The time to complete a project in modern C++ no longer exceeds that of more traditional approach: JS, Python, PHP, Ruby, Java etc. etc. The performance is stellar though and beats the competition hands down.
Why? It is still available. In my Debian/Devuan installation I can see numerous versions of Lisp available, including elisp, emacs lisp, common lisp (Carnegie Melon, Steel Bank, etc) and several others.
You can also have SLIME, the Superior Lisp Interaction Mode for Emacs.
This post has been deleted by its author
True, and "widely used" and "popular" are not the same as best.
Paul Graham's essay about the choice of Lisp by a start-up is interesting reading, particularly that knowing that most of their competitors were using C or C++ increased their confidence in their choice of Lisp.
http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html
This post has been deleted by its author
"Stats, damned stats..." you remember the rest.
Go and Rust have shown that you can stand up relatively small, standalone executables that are lightning fast and work well, Java needs a 500mb runtime bag of tricks to just support it's own standard library. It's no real surprise people might well be looking back to the "orignal golang" that is C++ as a way to reduce footprint and get faster execution across thousands or millions of calls or objects.
Java will happily run with a couple megs of heap depending on what you want to do. What requires 500mb in stdlib? I just created a Java service that processes logs via an API at 20k logs a second on my windows dev machine when limited to 200mb RSS.
If your methodology ends up with Delphi/Object Pascal as a bigger language than Ruby or Objective-C, it's just rubbish. I think the last time I knew anyone who was using Delphi was last century.
Measure it by jobs using something like Jobserve and C++ is way below C# or Java.
If you want to know the future, look at something like Advent of Code. What are people who are young and doing fun stuff using right now. A decade ago, this will be mainstream. And the most used languages are: Python, Rust, Javascript. C#, Java. C++ was in 8th place. If I was advising a kid on what to learn, I'd probably go with the top 3: Python, Rust, Javascript (and Typescript).They'll still be lots of old C# and Java around but the new stuff is going to be more in those languages.
>"And the most used languages are: Python, Rust, Javascript. C#, Java."
You had me until I saw Rust in your list. There are some specific areas (blockchain for example) where you might find employment that requires Rust but in the rest of the industry Rust's jobs are nowhere on radar. It could go either way in the future. The rest of the languages you've mentioned including C++ will guarantee being employed for a looong time.
This post has been deleted by its author
This post has been deleted by its author
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
