TikTok NSFW if you work for the South Dakota government The governor of South Dakota issued an executive order on Tuesday banning the use of Chinese social media platform TikTok for state government agencies, employees and contractors on state devices. In a press release the state government said the order was in response to the growing national security threat posed by TikTok's …
TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, could gain control of user data stored on mobile devices, such as browsing history, location and keystrokes, and use it to gather sensitive information, steal intellectual property or for other "illicit purposes."
How dare they, that's the NSA's job
> TikTok doesn't just see user videos, it "collects search and browsing histories... plus ... stored on a device's clipboard."
Pretty standard fare for any old 'phone app
> Chinese national security laws compel companies operating in China to share their data with the government upon request
Whereas the US laws explicitly prevent anything like that, eh?
> The Chinese Communist Party uses information that it gathers on TikTok to manipulate the American people
The US party (parties!) have never, ever attempted to manipulate anyone, American or dirty foreign scum (aka "allies").
> Common criticisms against TikTok ... are that it is harmful and addictive, and contains misinformation
And competes in these important arenas with Good Old Yank companies like FB, YT, Twitter
> There is that, but it IS still a spy tool from the CCP
Don't deny that.
But from the point of view of the majority of the people in the world who are part of neither China nor the US, we're seeing *both* lots gathering the same information on everyone (or having a damn good try at doing so).
Any particular reason to be happier about one side rather than the other?
(And, yes, the UK, France, Kenya, Tuvalu and all the rest would probably also like to get the same info, but so far only two players have managed to get massive numbers of people to voluntarily install the apps).
At least it is an example of banning a "social" media site. It's not a great example, but we need more even if it's just for one entertainment+gossip.
"...nations who hate us,"
China hates us? Can't say I believe that for 1 second. I know the banks can't believe that.
The whole thing comes.off as a deceptive hate speech (which IMO is worse than an intentional hate speech).
Social media is mental torture, it's doing us all in and the quicker we stop using it and try to get our kids off it and back to having more than 15 sec attention spans, the better humanity will be. Have you ever watched Snapchat video feeds? 10-15 secs back to back continous video stream of absolute garbage! TikTok, basically Chinese spyware pretending to be "for da yoof", meanwhile turning our young people into jibbering morons, all in the name of making people crave careers as "content creators". Some of it is valid but 95% of it is trash.
When I used to use public transport I saw it every morning but it was with the adults... You recognize it immediately because they use their phone with one hand and just need a small thumb movement to switch between the videos. There was never any text on the screens, it was just ensledd videos.
I have never actually seen TikTok outside of what I have seen on the YT streams.
Well duhhh! Who'd want to run it on a device which can't connect to the internet. Just ban it from all state-owned devices
The problem with legislators they always like to add extra phrases to any statement which in other circumstances can be used as loop-holes. That's why the very rich pay less tax than lower income earners.
Not because TikTok is turning the children of South Dakota into Manchurian candidates, but because it's a time waster unrelated to the employees' jobs. My wife is a government employee (not of South Dakota) and at her workplace all kinds of time wasting nonsense are blocked, simply because the taxpayers would appreciate it if their public employees would do something other than watch videos all day.
She is told that the public affairs office has a pass. Which makes sense because those folks are paid to create time wasting nonsense.
The anti-commie rhetoric is a bit silly, but they're politicians. When the electorate is silly, it's pretty much a job requirement to say silly things.
"The Chinese Communist Party may attain this personal information because ByteDance is headquartered in China and Chinese national security laws compel companies operating in China to share their data with the government upon request,"
Good job the US government doesn't do that sort of thing, isn't it!
It's effectively a work device so it's up to the provider what their policy is. I have nothing personal on my work devices (phone, laptop, tablet) and would not visit TT or FB (I don't on my own either). YT is only rarely used and only for work purposes. I also have no expectation of privacy on any of my work equipment. It's simple - only use work devices for work.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
