back to article Chinese Loongson chips coming in 2023, on par with 2020 x86 kit

China is set to get its hands on homegrown processors next year that purportedly rival the performance of AMD and Intel chips released over the past two years Chinese semiconductor company Loongson recently announced that its next-generation Godson CPU, the 3A6000, will sample with customers in the first half of 2023, …

  1. LybsterRoy Silver badge

    So a bit slower than the latest up to date chips eh. How many people/business roles actually need that performance?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Came here to make that same exact point - we're currently replacing all of the laptops at work, but purely because at 8 years old they're getting tatty and we're starting to see too many unexpected failures: they're all still absolutely fine performance wise.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Maybe I'm a cynic...

      On other sites, the "on par with an AMD Ryzen 5000" is based on IPC - the expected clock rates are in the 2GHz-2.5GHz rate, so likely half the performance assuming this is per core.

      For previous generations of Loongson, performance tended to match x86 in a subset of tests and general performance tended to be lower than initially advertised

      The real question is if this can be produced at the supposed 7nm process node in volume - previous versions at "new" SMIC process nodes yielded very poorly so 3 years may be closer to 6-8 years. If they have a working "7nm equivalent" process node that has acceptable yields and the necessary equipment to produce these in volume, then it is indeed impressive even if the performance is less than stated as that would likely provide a competitive high performance Chinese CPU to allow an alternative to western equivalents

      1. Bartholomew

        Re: Maybe I'm a cynic...

        From a translation of the linked website "According to Loongson’s previous information, 3A6000 will not continue to improve the process, and will still use the existing 12nm process, but will greatly improve the architecture design. The architecture will be upgraded from the current GS464V to LA664, so the single-core performance will be greatly improved". The current 3A5000 were made at TSMC fab using their N16/N12 process, so the question is where will the 3A6000 be made China at SMIC ?

    3. werdsmith Silver badge

      It also matters how much power the devices consume and consequently how much heat they produce in achieving this performance. This information is not in the article but if these processors are efficiently relative to similar performing x86 then I’m sure a song and dance would have been made of it.

  2. steviebuk Silver badge

    Hate to keep saying it

    But with Xi in charge I wouldn't trust any of this. Its well known now to be able to do business in China you have to give the CCP access. Which is what will happen here.

    1. Bartholomew

      Re: Hate to keep saying it

      Where would CCP add this feature ?

      In the instruction set ?

      Some super secret extra CPU core dedicated to this feature ?

      The binary firmware which is not currently encrypted, so it could in theory be backward engineered and fully audited ? (The beta releases even contain the debug symbols!).

      In the binary firmware blobs used to provide access to additional hardware ?

      In the Operating System (Just like Microsoft:telemetry, Google:everything and Apple:everything) ?

      The ideal access for x64 is via the Intel ME and AMD PSP both of which run signed and encrypted code that can never be audited. All it would take is one FISA court order for the feature to be enabled/added.

      I'm not saying that China wouldn't, just that the simplest tap point is not the hardware but the software. And since this is designed mainly for the internal market, the OS is the cheapest and easiest place to add and continually update any feature like that.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Do you believe that they and several other governments cannot reverse engineer the Intel Management Engine?

  4. sreynolds

    If they were copying Intel.....

    Then it's all downhill from here.

  5. Will Godfrey Silver badge
    Meh

    Worth watching - as usual

    Equivalent to a few years old now, but how quickly will they build on that?

    America is doing an excellent job of pushing China to become not only fully independent, but also a serious competitor.

    1. Rattus

      Re: Worth watching - as usual

      If the performance is even close to that being trailed then this is a big win for the Chinese

      equivalence to 2020 era AMD64 CPUs and on a MUCH larger die process....

      If that really is true then it can be assumed that parity in performance has been achieved already

      1. Bartholomew
        Flame

        Re: Worth watching - as usual

        One minor thing is that the Loongson 3A6000 chips will be manufactured with a 12 nm process. Will that be the exact same 12 nm process as the Loongson 3A5000 (at TMSC), or a later iteration of the 12nm TMSC process.

        The simulations of the 3A6000 are being compared to chips made with the 10 nm Intel SuperFin process (100.76 million transistors/square mm) and the 7FF TSMC process (95.08 million transistors/square mm). I'm going to randomly guess that the larger process means that they will be using at least 250% power, or more, to match the performance. And require more cooling (hence the fire icon).

        65W 10 nm Intel SuperFin process Tiger Lake Core i3 11100B (2020-09-02) has 6 (12) Cores (threads), 480KiB L1, 7.5MiB L2, 12 MiB L3

        65W 7FF TSMC process Ryzen 5 5600X (2020-11-05) has 6 (12) Cores (threads), 384 KiB L1, 3 MiB L2, 32 MiB L3

        150W 12 nm TSMC process 3C5000L (2021) has 16 cores 64KiB Data and 64KiB instruction L1, 4MiB L2, 64 MiB L3

        I'm also going to guess that all the caches will be larger (more cores, more power, more heat). But I do agree that it is a big deal for China, even if it is leaning on TSMC.

    2. steviebuk Silver badge

      Re: Worth watching - as usual

      Depends what they can steal

      1. that one in the corner Silver badge

        Re: Worth watching - as usual

        > Depends what they can steal

        Were you referring to China or the USA?

        1. LazLong

          Re: Worth watching - as usual

          >Were you referring to China or the USA?

          China, obviously. Or do you not know Loongson is MIPS-based, with some borrowing from RISC-V?

      2. Anonymous Coward
        Anonymous Coward

        Re: Worth watching - as usual

        have stolen, past tense.

  6. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    It's time for the US and UK ...

    ... to make customised versions of the Stuxnet worm to destroy Chinese chip foundries ... and once the US chip fabs are up, to infect and destroy TSMC's factory in Taiwan.

    The West must win by any means possible - even mass extermination if required.

    There is no more dangerous adversary in any space at the moment than China - they must be wiped out to the last person

    *Cough cough* - I've taken my meds and am ok now - what did I miss?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like