back to article Security firms hijack New York trees to monitor private workforce

Private security firms in New York City have co-opted public resources – specifically trees – to track their guards as they make their rounds. According to Gothamist, a New York-focused news site, security contractors have been drilling into trees on public city streets to install signaling hardware to ensure that guards are …

  1. b0llchit Silver badge
    WTF?

    Watching the watcher

    I wonder when they will pay guards to watch the guards. Not the electronic ones, no real ones. These watching guards then will need watching by new guards. The watching watching guards may need a reminder to do some watching by guards who watch the watching watching guards to watch the watch watch the watching guards watching the guards.

    We also need at least two guards watching the guard and two guards watching the watching guards, which are watched by the watching watching watching guards watching the watched watch watching the guards. We only need 33 layers of two guards watching the guard to have 100% global employment.

    Keep watching that guard, guards!

    1. Jellied Eel Silver badge

      Re: Watching the watcher

      One of the interesting snippets from the Pelosi assault was about guards. So Washington's Capitol Police apparently has an outpost in SF, with securitty cameras. Apparently the guards only became aware of the break-in and assault after they saw SF police red & blue flashers on their monitors.

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Watching the watcher

      When you have all the guards watching, have the original guard watch the top guard. You know, just in case the circle needs closure.

      Anon, in case they're watching.

      1. Neil Barnes Silver badge
        Holmes

        Re: Watching the watcher

        "But who watches _you_, Mr Vimes?"

        "I watch me..."

        (Pterry, of course, and probably misquoted.)

        1. Kane
          Coat

          Re: Watching the watcher

          *Ahem*, Excuse me...

          “I can tell you anything you need to know,” said Vimes.

          “Yes, Your Grace, but that is not how an inquiry works. I must act completely independently. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Your Grace.”

          “I know that one,” said Vimes. “Who watches the watchmen? Me, Mr. Pessimal.”

          “Ah, but who watches you, Your Grace?” said the inspector with a brief smile.

          “I do that, too. All the time,” said Vimes. “Believe me.”

          1. DishonestQuill

            Re: Watching the watcher

            Thank you for saving me the effort of typing that out.

            Thud! may not have been his finest piece of writing by I was always keen on A.E. as a character.

            1. Eclectic Man Silver badge
              Joke

              Re: Watching the watcher

              My favourite line from that novel is Mr. Pessimal, to a group of assembled trolls: "Come on if you think you're hard enough."

              Genius.

            2. David 132 Silver badge
              Thumb Up

              Re: Watching the watcher

              I don't think he made enough use of A.E. Pessimal as a character. I mean, there was his introduction in Thud! and a brief conversation between him & Carrot about the Dreadful Logic of Necessity in Snuff, but not really much more than that.

              Sigh.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Watching the watcher

      Why don't they just track the GPS on the guards phones, like Android (Google) & Apple do to all of us?

      1. David Nash

        Re: Watching the watcher

        Because it can be turned off? I don't keep GPS on mine unless I need it.

        1. doublelayer Silver badge

          Re: Watching the watcher

          If you employ guards, you likely give them a communication method which you control, so you can prevent them from disabling GPS on that device and use that to track them. No less intrusive to them (though how much tracking is justified when you are working is subjective) but it does prevent the work and damage caused by installing tracking devices in trees.

          1. imanidiot Silver badge

            Re: Watching the watcher

            GPS reception and accuracy is generally terrible indoors and in the urban canyons of cities like NYC. Bad enough to not be reliable for keeping fine track of a guard doing his rounds.

            1. doublelayer Silver badge

              Re: Watching the watcher

              Is that still true with the use of WiFi and Bluetooth used to obtain more specific data? Those methods, whether we like them or not, have been tried and used successfully for some time, and cities are full of things that emit a signal and don't move which can be used as landmarks for something identifying patterns.

      2. An_Old_Dog Silver badge

        Re: Watching the watcher

        Why don't they forget all this pointlessly-high-tech shit and just use the old watchman's-key + (armored) keycode+time recording clocks at the various stations on the rounds the guard is supposed to make?

        1. Neil Barnes Silver badge

          Re: Watching the watcher

          I wonder what the breakdown is between 'make sure the guard is doing the rounds he's supposed to' and 'be able to prove after an event that the guard did the rounds he was supposed to'?

          In these litigious days I suspect more the latter than the former.

        2. Michael Wojcik Silver badge

          Re: Watching the watcher

          The high-tech shit is cheaper to manufacture and maintain, and it gives the vendor something shiny to sell.

    4. Triggerfish

      Re: Watching the watcher

      It's ipsos custodes all the way down.

    5. Jason Bloomberg Silver badge

      Re: Watching the watcher

      When I was involved in security, before mobiles were a thing, we used to have 'key stations' which guards doing their rounds would need to activate.

      We were the 'guards watching the guards', but purely for their own safety to ensure there hadn't been a 'man down' we didn't know about. But yes, it enforced doing their job, protected the company and guards against accusations of not doing their job, and there was shit to pay if they weren't keying-in when and where they were expected to but there was leeway

      So it's not a new thing, but the underlying motivation for doing it can vary.

  2. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Tree torture

    Guards clocking in at checkpoints is nothing new. Drilling holes in public trees is!

    1. Neil Barnes Silver badge

      Re: Tree torture

      Here in Germany trees are often protected at construction or road works sites by wrapping them in a girdle of three by one inch planks[1]. I have no doubt it prevents accidental damage from things driving into them, but when I see it it always strikes me that it's as tactful as giving the workers PPE made out of human skin...

      [1] they're probably metric; I haven't measured.

      1. AnotherName

        Re: Tree torture

        I seem to remember when living in Germany in the early 80's that if an accident involved tree damage, the tree had to be paid for out of the insurance claim too. When the RAF Harriers did their field exercises deployed in the edge of woodland for cover, there was a bill to pay for every tree damaged or knocked over - particularly expensive during wet weather when it was easier to uproot a tree or two.

        1. F. Frederick Skitty Silver badge

          Re: Tree torture

          Not just trees, but any damage to property caused by military manoeuvres. There used to be lots of military exercises in West Germany during the Cold War, and it wasn't unusual for a farmer to find a bunch of tanks smashing through one of his hedges and churning up a field. The occupying forces would then cough up for the damage caused.

          1. Lon24

            Re: Tree torture

            These devices contain batteries - type undefined. Most have a shelf life and exposed to the elements will eventually leak. Not always to the taste of the tree methinks.

            1. Arthur the cat Silver badge

              Re: Tree torture

              They look remarkably like iButtons and the description "unique laser-recorded serial number in a stainless steel casing" is the same. iButtons are definitely not waterproof. They can also usually be reprogrammed via a one wire interface.

        2. Anonymous Coward
          Anonymous Coward

          Re: Tree torture

          I seem to think that the phrase "bought the farm" originated from compensation paid for crop damage in the event of a crash. (Or am I quoting an Urban Myth?)

    2. Helcat Silver badge

      Re: Tree torture

      I'd like to see the people putting these devices IN the trees fined. Heavily.

      I can see the problem being in identifying who is doing this.

      I suspect the authorities might resort to posting guards at the trees. They'll probably have to hire the guards, of course, and the company who they hire to do this might just... drill holes into the trees they're guarding to insert devices to ensure the guards are guarding the tree and stopping people drilling holes into the tree to insert devices to make sure the guards are at their post.

      Next they'll have to get guards to guard the trees from the companies hired to guard the trees to make sure none of this happens. Or they know who to fine when it does.

      1. TRT

        Re: Tree torture

        I'd be having a discreet word with Treebeard.

    3. TRT

      Re: Tree torture

      Groot!

    4. Dizzy Dwarf

      Re: Tree torture

      It's nothing new ...

      In days of yore,

      when knights were bold

      and women weren't invented,

      they drilled a hole

      in a telegraph-pole

      and had to be contented.

  3. M.V. Lipvig Silver badge

    Where I am, far from the overpriced cities, a single full size tree replacement costs around 30,000 dollars.* This doesn't even include the cost of a full size tree, but is the cost to move from one part of my property to another. I imagine the cost to replace a tree in the city is around 100,000 dollars, plus the cost of the tree.

    The correct way to solve this is for the city to fine the company for the replacement cost of each tree with this equipment attached, along with the destruction of removed equipment. Then they can fill the hole with whatever wood putty arborists use to patch trees, and glue a little piece of bark over the patch.

    *And how quickly I decided I didn't want a tree moved after all!

    1. ChoHag Silver badge

      fine the company for the replacement cost of each tree

      > the cost of the tree

      That's about 30+ years. Trees don't grow on money.

      1. David 132 Silver badge
        Coffee/keyboard

        Re: fine the company for the replacement cost of each tree

        ChoHag> Trees don't grow on money.

        Get out.

    2. Joe W Silver badge

      Moving?

      Really moving? Digging out and putting somewhere else?

      Here we are talking about chopping down a f'd up tree and planting a new one. I guess we are looking at a bit less. But then I'd totally fine them 100k or more for destruction of public property, ecological vandalism, gross neglect and... dunno. Per tree. Especially since a young tree takes about two or so decades to grow into something halfway decent. At the very least. I don't know how old the trees in our garden are, there's abunch, but they are not super chunky.

      1. KittenHuffer Silver badge
        Facepalm

        Re: Moving?

        "I don't know how old the trees in our garden are"

        Get a chain saw out and count the rings, then you'll know how old they ..... were! Oh! Oops! Sorry!

        1. TRT

          Re: Moving?

          In order to avoid being chopped down, particularly magical and semi-sentient trees might evolve a system of displaying their age in the patterning of their bark. However, this may have the unfortunate side effect of making them very attractive to the sellers of house number plaques.

          *Courtesy of I think it's PTerry. I think. IIRC. Otherwise, colour me Corden.

          1. DishonestQuill

            Re: Moving?

            T'was indeed a PTerry reference. From Mort, if I remember correctly.

            Buggrit Millenium hand and shrimp

      2. imanidiot Silver badge

        Re: Moving?

        It's quite common that once an old tree has grown big and tall, all the other trees around it have too. A young tree (or even a sapling) planted in it's place is unlikely to ever reach similar size and has a drastically reduced chance of survival to even get old in the first place. Some trees are simply irreplaceable.

    3. myhandler

      Pfft, just 3d print some new trees, nobody will notice.

    4. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

      "The correct way to solve this is for the city to fine the company for the replacement cost of each tree"

      Or, alternatively, it being New York, use it as a revenue stream by issuing lucrative licences allowing them to mount their trackers on the trees. Unlicensed trackers will be removed and the offenders fined. And, of course, it being New York, this scheme will run at a loss because of the costs in enforcing it :-)

  4. Pascal Monett Silver badge
    Facepalm

    Well duh

    "Amazon's worker surveillance disproportionately targets low-paid workers and people of color"

    Not hard to understand how that works. Where do the low-paid worker work ? On the warehouse floor, gathering items for Internet orders*.

    Where do the better-paid workers work ? In management, watching screens all day and pressuring low-paid workers for not moving fast enough and having to pee.

    You're not going to put surveillance on management, now are you ?

    * and talking about people of color is a cheap shot. I'm sure the lowly white guy on the warehouse floor is under just as much surveillance as his afro-american colleague.

    1. Lil Endian
      Thumb Up

      Surveillance at Mission Control...?

      "I'm Simon. I just thought I'd catch a few words with you and hopefully clear up a misunderstanding."

      The viscosity of Gary's bravado takes a bit of a nose dive as the lift eases to a halt between floors. I nod at the camera on the roof so that Gary can witness the LED turning off.

      I was sure there was an episode covering surveillance, but I couldn't find it. Anyone...?

      Now that's out of my system, I do agree with you: the use of the word "disproportionately" is misleading. Statistics, eh? Who'd have thought they could be twisted to suit one's own agenda!

      Lowly office workers have been monitored far longer, as their work usually leaves audit trails. Ok, it's incidental monitoring, but active is there too. They're often at static work stations too.

      Middle manglement, not as easy because they're usually "being really busy, erm, over there!". I'm happy if I can't monitor them within my Mission Control!

      Programmer: yup, she's still sitting at that VT330...

      C-Suite: golf course.

      One thing I'm curious about: The company says, "...and what they inspected at a location."

      How? 'When' and 'where' they are, yeah, obvs. But 'what' they were "inspecting" (?looking at), not with just a single Dingle Button me thinks! Seems a stretch (aka marketing BS).

      (Dingle Button, Deggy Berry or just Dingle Berry? Vote now!)

    2. Christoph
      Devil

      Re: Well duh

      "You're not going to put surveillance on management, now are you ?"

      Well of course! It's important to the shareholders that management are doing their jobs and not skiving off, so they should be able to spy on what management are getting up to.

      After all the managers can hardly complain about getting the same surveillance as the workers, now can they?

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: Well duh

      "and talking about people of color is a cheap shot." Pretty sure that what they're saying there is the people of color are more likely to be low paid.

      1. Falmari Silver badge

        Re: Well duh

        @Pete B"Pretty sure that what they're saying there is the people of color are more likely to be low paid."

        It maybe what they were trying to say or trying to infer. But it most certainly was not what they said.

  5. LybsterRoy Silver badge

    I'm not sure what these people are guarding but having worked in a number of locations with "night watchmen" its often been required that they key into a station at various points of their area to 1) prove that they've actually been patrolling and 2) check if they're still alive (said stations would report to base if not keyed at the right time) so I don't really see a problem with this approach.

    Actually I do have one problem, if inserting the device harmed the trees it shouldn't be done.

  6. b1k3rdude

    Well as these guards are a) probably ethnic minority workers and b) dont want to loose thier job - of course they dont f***ing have a problem with being tracked... The shit will hit the fan when the system is hacked and/or abused and a guard is seriously harmed or loses thier life. Only then will something get done, typical murica.

    What I dont get is why neither city council is prosecuting these companies for damaging public property and/or threatening them with large fines if the issue persists.

  7. Norman Nescio

    Mechanical version

    The concept of using technology to try and ensure that a watchman did their rounds has been around for a long time:

    Watchman's Clock

  8. nichomach

    Hang on a mo'

    I'm not sure of the situation in New York, but drilling into public property like that without prior authorisation in the UK would be criminal damage.

    1. imanidiot Silver badge

      Re: Hang on a mo'

      Also, why is an apparently private security guard required to do rounds in a public park??

  9. PB90210 Bronze badge

    all-weather transmitters that communicate with a mobile phone app

    Erm... you've got a mobile with 'location services' and you feel the need to (illegally) install transmitters to communicate with an app on that mobile to tell you what the phone already knows?

    Oh, I see... the app is there to track the location of the transmitters in case they get stolen by the parks dept!

    (my head hurts)

  10. jvf

    Assholes all, especially jeff bozo

  11. Marty McFly Silver badge
    Devil

    It is not about monitoring guards...

    This is all about legal arse covering.

    A Bad Thing happens at a particular location. Lawsuit ensues, claiming the company did not provide adequate security. Company pulls up logs showing the regular guard intervals. Due diligence has been validated. Case closed.

    Avoiding the downside of one multi-million dollar lawsuit pays for a lot of trackers on trees.

  12. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Business cards

    I remember when security guards used to stuff a business card in a door or window ledge on their way around.

    Stuff 5 cards in at random, go back and sleep the rest of the shift.

  13. zaax

    These are viewed on laptops. Ipso facto, Hunter Biden.

  14. Ken Moorhouse Silver badge

    Does this not damage the tree?

    Surely people will have noticed the leavesdropping?

  15. Ken Moorhouse Silver badge

    Clearly the work of...

    Special Branch.

  16. Fruit and Nutcase Silver badge
    Coat

    Scent Marking

    Animals have been scent marking on trees for millennia - both to denote territory and also to advertise a recent visit. I guess city folk and the burghers may frown if security firms required their operatives to follow suit

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like