back to article Lloyd's of London cuts off network after dodgy activity detected

Lloyd's of London has cut off its IT systems and is probing a possible cyberattack against it after detecting worrisome network behavior this week. "Lloyd's has detected unusual activity on its network and we are investigating the issue," a spokesperson told The Register on Thursday. "As a precautionary measure, we are …

  1. elDog

    It's not a war, goddamit. It's a Special Military Operation. And Lloyds better cover it!

    "Even before detecting a possible IT intrusion, Lloyd's has been in the infosec headlines since late August after making changes to its policies that will soon prohibit its syndicates from covering losses arising from certain nation-state cyberattacks and those that happen during wars."

    Not only that, but if the USSR (aka the rump Russia) has declared certain areas of the world its own (Ukraine and most of the 'stans), then there really can't be a "war" - just another putting down of an insurrection.

    Sounds very much like the plan in the USofA with the (r)epuglicon party playing the part of the putinistas.

    With a tiny bit of legal chicanery, Lloyd's should be able to legally weasel its way out of any reimbursements.

    1. katrinab Silver badge
      Meh

      Re: It's not a war, goddamit. It's a Special Military Operation. And Lloyds better cover it!

      It could be a civil war, against an independence movement.

  2. clyde666

    reboots dodgy network

    So they restarted the router then?

    1. Martin Summers

      Re: reboots dodgy network

      Leet hacker: "bugger they've caught me and cut me off",

      5 minutes later:

      "Oh, nope, back again. Slightly faster too, bonus."

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    How do you reset "IT"?

    Did they power down the whole building following the Windows principle?

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: How do you reset "IT"?

      I assume they have gone back to factory defaults, and started again. No?

  4. This is not a drill

    From March 2023, all standalone cyber insurance policies underwritten by members of the sprawling Lloyd’s of London marketplace “must exclude liability for losses arising from any state-backed cyber attack” the 300-year-old organisation has warned – telling members that cyber attack coverage “if not managed properly… has the potential to expose the market to systemic risks that syndicates could struggle to manage.”

    Looks like they are getting their own attack in before the deadline they imposed.

    1. Lon24

      Which implies it's not just the perpetrators who are making money out of non-state ransomware attacks. Just a fresh new stream of properly managed premium profits for Lloyds and thereby incentivising more attacks as the targets who are assured to pay up.

      I can understand that it's not good optics for Lloyds being seen to be profiting directly from Russian & North Korean state actors. Making all ransomware insurance illegal may have been a better way.

  5. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    BYOD Failure

    My Money is on Nigel Farage up to old tricks with BYOD again...

    1. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: BYOD Failure

      Once again Zelensky warns it's going to happen and Russia will be behind it. Then it happens.

      Waiting for the postage stamp.

  6. Twanky
    Meh

    Profits

    According to Lloyd's 2021 annual report, it took in £39.2 billion ($45 billion) in gross written premiums and took in £2.3 billion ($2 billion) in profit before tax.

    So, 5.9% gross profit? Could do better.

    An interesting bind: the insured are unlikely to be able to directly influence their governments' actions but those actions may provoke greater risk of other states' sponsored attacks on the insured. The higher the profile of the insured, the greater the risk of being targetted as a symbol of the bloc.

    I imagine the 'rulers' of some eastern states might enjoy the disruption of high profile western trophy targets such as major telecoms providers or manufacturers/distributors of soft drinks or fast/junk foods.

    I guess our best course of action is to tighten and compartmentalise our systems to make them resistant and resilient when the inevitable attacks occur - which is what should have been happening anyway.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like