
As a former employee of 20 years
I'd rather see my tax dollar go toward researching silly walks, or literally anything else.
President Joe Biden popped by IBM's latest chipmaking venture this week as Big Blue clearly hopes to keep the White House close and bag a slice of those government semiconductor manufacturing subsidies. The American leader had been invited to the IT giant's campus in Poughkeepsie, New York, where he unveiled a $20 billion …
One can do a lot of R&D without owning the actual production fab equipment though. I've been to their research fab in Albany and it's a pretty impressive facility. Apparently IBM simply wasn't making enough chips for it to be worth running their own fab lines and it made financial sense to sell the fabs and pay someone else for part time use of them instead of having to pay for a fab that wasn't doing anything part of the time..
"while education and healthcare are left in the doldrums."
Don't forget the unfilled potholes, rusty old bridges and the increasing cost of a college education.
I was just looking at the costs of going to the local community college to learn a new thing or two and my jaw dropped. It's less expensive for general education courses rather than paying a Uni for the exact same, but good grief! I was really looking at being able to take a few courses and cozy up to the profs to be able to use some facilities I don't have at home and be able to pick a few minds. It would also mean I'd officially be a "student" and could get student discounts for things. As it is, the cost is too much.
It is the U.S. free enterprise over government issue. I'll happily champion free enterprise, but not when it is essentially corporate welfare.
It seems to me that if the government needs to step in to make chip manufacturing happen that the government should run the facility. Why shouldn't the taxpayer see a return on the investment?
"It seems to me that if the government needs to step in to make chip manufacturing happen that the government should run the facility. Why shouldn't the taxpayer see a return on the investment?"
I'm trying to make sense of those two sentences. I've never found that government anything has had any sort of direct payback. Anything that should be in the private sector needs to be firmly in the private sector.