Re: Explosives do, what politics did not
Propaganda. If they leave the valves shut and people freeze to death, that looks very bad. If there is too much damage to repair the line in a short period of time, somebody external can be blamed and the gas remains off.
Yep. There have already been several large protests around the EU due to high energy costs, and winter hasn't started yet. There's been pressure on Germany to 'do something', because if it doesn't, it's economy is going to be destroyed, there'll be mass unemployment, and people are going to freeze to death. Russia has repeatedly said that gas is there, if you just order it. Now, Germany can't. If it was getting cold feet about the impact of EU sanctions in the past, it's certainly going to get cold feet now.
And of course there's the obvious propaganda value of instantly blaming Russia (as the Bbc did by quoting Ukrainian 'experts'), despite the total lack of evidence, or even much plausibility.
Was the damage from an external source or are the pipes blown out in a way that points to either some sort of defect or a device that was sent down the line and detonated. It's all speculation, conspiracy stories and guesses until there is data. I hope we get some.
Yep. That's the problem of Instablame, lack of any critical thinking, or just 'fact checking'. When the story first broke, I saw comments that the pipes were at around 650m depth. So that would make sabotage tricky. Experts have been busy spewing 'facts' like it must have been an attack by a state actor, therefore Russia.
But the pipes are apparently only 100-150m deep, which makes sabotage much more doable. No need for Bond-style subs, mini-subs, or pig-bombs when eco-terrorists could have done this, if they could have rounded up some technical or commercial divers. It's a depth workable on rebreathers, mixed gas or heliox. Then you'd just need explosives. Off-the-shelf linear and point shaped charges are widely used in the oil & gas industry, and designed to punch or cut holes in pipes like these. We've shipped tons of explosives into conflict zones over the last few years, and can't account for most of it. Then there's stuff like this-
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/09/22/mystery-military-drone-spying-russias-black-sea-fleet-discovered/
which doesn't really look like a diving drone, but technology makes those possible. Or perhaps probably. One aspect that suprised me a bit was the seismic data. and reports of the size of the blasts. That seemed like overkill to me given shaped charges would have done the job just as well and needed much less explosives. But if you're improvising, I guess you work with what you've got.. Which could be a modified sea mine, torpedo warhead, or you're just not being very professional about it. But given the amount of surveillance in the Baltic, and especially choke points like Bonholm, you should probably notice suspicious behavior on, or beneath the waves. Sweden and Denmark have regularly caught Russian subs and mini-subs sneaking around it's waters in the past.
So it's all rather strange, and there's a lot of questions that must be answered. Along with a lot of rumors, conspiracy theories and mis/disinformation from both official and unofficial sources. It's one of those things governments really need to improve on given past lies, and our ability to contradict what should be 'reliable sources'. If there's hard evidence of Russia's involvement, show it. After all this is a very serious attack on the EU that is going to result in trillions in economic damages, and deaths.