back to article ChromeLoader, what took you so long? Malvertising irritant now slings ransomware

ChromeLoader – the malware that exploded onto the scene this year by hijacking browsers to redirect users to pages of ads – is apparently evolving into a more significant threat by deploying malicious payloads that go beyond malvertising. Variants of the software nasty have been seen dropping ransomware on Windows PCs and …

  1. Tubz Silver badge
    Trollface

    How dare anybody else show unwanted adverts in your browser or anywhere else, that's Meta, Google and Microsoft's job ! They are stealing the food from the mouths of overpaid execs, will nobody stop and think of them.

  2. Andy Non Silver badge
    Facepalm

    Some folks just ask for problems.

    "ChromeLoader is typically delivered in ISO image files that marks are tricked into downloading, opening, and running the contents of"

    Knowingly downloading what they think is illegal content, from an unknown, un-trusted source. Anyone dumb enough to do that almost deserves what they get.

    1. Diogenes8080

      Re: Some folks just ask for problems.

      Truth, but there are many ways to trick a user. A wiser council might be "should this recipient ever need to receive an ISO attachment?" Exempt your techs and block for everyone else, at least from external sources.

    2. WolfFan

      Re: Some folks just ask for problems.

      Never underestimate the idiocy of those who must have certain software, but don’t want to pay. Way back when, in the heyday of the peer-to-peer ‘sharing’ sites, Microsoft released a new version of Office for Windows and Mac. Certain people wanted the full version, with all the apps, even if they only used Excel and Word and maybe PowerPoint a few times a year. The full version cost $600+. So some went on various ‘sharing’ sites to get it. Someone put something labeled the full installer for Office for Mac, and something else allegedly the installer for Office for Windows. In both cases the ‘installer’ was under 200kB in size. The full installer was in excess of 600 MB, how much in excess depending on whether it was the Mac or Windows version. What this thing did was erase things. On a Mac it would delete the user’s files and folders, unless the user was an admin, in which case it would erase the drive. On Windows it would just erase the drive.

      Microsoft denied having anything to do with it. Sure they didn’t.

      Personally, I just told the idiots who got nailed by it that perhaps they should have wondered how a 200k installer was going to install the hundreds of megabytes of files required for Office. Did they really think that the thing would download the required data from MS, and that MS wouldn’t notice? Really? Or was it just really well compressed? Or was actual thought not involved in the first place?

      Idiots.

      I would ask them if they had backups, knowing that the answer would be ‘no’.

      Idiots in the lower range of idiots, below even the level occupied by Tory MPs.

      1. DJV Silver badge

        Re: below even the level occupied by Tory MPs

        Crikey, I didn't realise you could even get lower than that!

        1. James O'Shea Silver badge

          Re: below even the level occupied by Tory MPs

          Trump Republicans can.

    3. steviebuk Silver badge

      Re: Some folks just ask for problems.

      The Sony rootkit didn't come from illegal content but bent business practices. This could also come from the same.

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Chrome in name, arbitrary code execution in fact

    The fact that Carbon Black was treating this as an "annoyance" instead of a serious threat make me uneasy. This is an executable code dropper. The fact that it's initial payload was a malvertising browser plugin just means that was their first paying customer. Treating them as an annoyance is just as dumb as treating someone who was tampering with pill bottles lightly because the first time they did it they substituted generic drugs for name brand. What they may do next is always an issue. If that risk is ransomware or fentanyl base counterfeits, it's a threat, not an annoyance and needs to be handled as such.

  4. DS999 Silver badge

    One of the few advantages of a browser monoculture

    Criminals are unlikely to bother developing a complex multistage exploit for Firefox, because they get a much bigger bang for the buck going after Chrome and Edge.

  5. mark l 2 Silver badge

    Since the malware is taking people to a page full of ads, surely it should be possible for the authorities to identify which ad network is serving the ads and get them to shut the scammers account and cut of their revenue stream?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Other stories you might like