Re: Google's minimum viable response
The laws won't help if the Supreme Court is a coup court. Speaking from local experience, the law can say X and the (military controlled) court can interpret that as !X and often does. The words of the law don't matter, the case law doesn't matter, they were not put in power by any democratic process, their loyalty is to the ones that put them in power.
The SCOTUS will simply require Google provide that information, and thus they cannot delete it. It is evidence of a crime, 'murder of a fetus who would have been Einstein/Curie', as they often put it.
You see the same pattern in the USA, with a long standing NY open-gun-carry law that survived many challenges over its 109 years. That law is suddenly killed by the Republican controlled supreme court, just after 19 kids are murdered in Texas and everyone is calling for MORE gun control. They don't care about the dead Texan kids, or the prior case law, the law doesn't matter, only their political affiliation matters.
Again, most of the Republican SCOTUS judges were put in power with Republicans *losing* the popular vote. One of them was put there by illegitimate process. Hundreds of State judges too, are there, only by the same trick. They are not loyal to the law because they did not gain power from legal process.
Who should decide to carry a child to term or get an abortion? The mother? Or Greg Abbott's pollsters? Because that's the real thing here, they polled it among their base, it scored well, they don't need a majority of the votes (and haven't won a majority of votes for most of the last 3 decades), they only need their base to vote to stay in power. So Greg Abbott's pollsters took away mothers right to decide to keep the child or not.
You see the "independent state legislature theory" going before SCOTUS next year, its a judicial coup, it has no basis in law. But it gives Republicans eternal power regardless of how people vote. I wonder whether Ginni Thomas asked for a Presidential pardon for her coup efforts, and whether her husband, supreme court judge Thomas is advising her on staying out of jail for those coup efforts, while he helps ensure she never faces prosecution by ensuring his group is always in power.