Shakes head in amazement
It always amazes me the ingenuity (pun not intended) of the NASA (and ESA) system designers and how they work around failure modes that no-one else would have thought about.
The Mars Ingenuity helicopter is in need of a patch to work around a failed sensor before another flight can be attempted. The helicopter's inclinometer failed during a recommissioning effort ahead of the 29th flight. The sensor is critical as it will reposition the craft nearer to the Perseverance rover for communication …
A patch that inserts small code snippets into human software running computers intercepting incoming garbage packets and injecting replacement packets constructed from rock solid data.
The Earth needs more of them than humans are ever likely to admit, and in what may be far too many cases, also disinclined to permit. Thank goodness AI and Global Operating Devices are on the ball and don't fall at that early simple hurdle.
Not really, or Perseverance needs to thrundle along.
Ingenuity is not fully independant, and needs Perseverance to be in range to receive flight path andto send back towards one of the Orbiter ( and eventually Earth ) what is collected/seen during the flight.
From what I've read, said range is more or less a kilometer... So Ingenuity can't go south unless Perseverance follows and stay in that kilometer range.
well it's way past it's warranty date... After all it was only intended to fly 5 times.
It always amazes me how long beyond the mandated/expected lifespan the things we lob around the Solar System can still operate. ( and the tricks the engineers working with them finds to make them work just that little bit longer )
Expected lifespans of spacecraft should always be taken with a large pinch of salt. They are usually stated as the absolute bare minimum to ensure the mission is considered a success, so the fact that they last longer is pretty expected (excluding the Voyager probes which are simply exceptional)