What on-line advertising really needs is banning except maybe when it is strictly opt-in: the user should be the customer, not the product. Advertising doesn't even really pay for any services as the cost of it ends up in the price of the products and services we pay for. With the current arrangement we not only ultimately pay in those higher prices, but also pay with a loss of privacy (which is the result of the snooping needed for targeted advertising), not to mention having to endure commercial propaganda (i.e. advertising), being manipulated, misled and misinformed by it. The sane way is paying for the services we use directly, cutting out a bunch of middlemen and restoring a market with competition to the services 'paid' for by advertising - any other claim is just meta-advertising.
UK monopoly watchdog investigates Google's online advertising business
The UK's Competition and Markets Authority is lining up yet another investigation into Google over its dominance of the digital advertising market. This latest inquiry, announced Thursday, is the second major UK antitrust investigation into Google this year alone. In March this year the UK, together with the European Union, …
COMMENTS
-
Friday 27th May 2022 17:14 GMT Pascal Monett
We're worried
"We're worried that Google may be using its position in ad tech to favour its own services to the detriment of its rivals, of its customers and ultimately of consumers"
Oh, so you're worried ? Well it's about bloody time. If Alphabet is today's 4th ranking company by value, it's not because it's been playing fair. Google has always played fast and loose with the rules, because it's Google that has made the rules. And now you're worried that Google might not have have established a fair and level playing field when there is nothing in the law that has given it the slightest incentive to do so ?
Duh.
Private companies do not government policy make.
-
-
-
This post has been deleted by its author
-
Sunday 29th May 2022 11:13 GMT Doctor Syntax
Re: "Another probe? Mountain View is starting to look like a pincushion at this rate"
In the accounts department it's written off as "the cost of doing business".
I don't think fines can be written off as a cost of doing business before tax. OTOH these cases seem to be civil cases and settlements are paid. They may be treated differently to fines.
-
-
Saturday 28th May 2022 15:13 GMT Doctor Syntax
"because millions of people across the UK use websites that rely on advertising revenue to offer high quality, free content."
More millions also use websites that rely on advertising revenue just for income but without the high quality aspect of the content. The content which they leave to the users to provide.