Adverts
Adverts are worse. Search for a product, and then everywhere you look is an advert for said product.
I've not experienced the phone eavesdropping on conversation yet, but I guess it's just a matter of time.
Sorry about the noise: two of my dishwashers are going through their rinse cycle. Pass me your plate and I'll set off the third. It's just my little fantasy. I have not really purchased three dishwashers. But a certain national retail chain of electrical goods wants me to. In fact, it is so insistent that I should keep buying …
A couple of Christmases ago, my wife had pointed out a number of pieces of clothing she wanted from a particular catalogue she'd received in the mail. I very discretely ordered several of said garments from the company's website.
Next day, I was showing her an article on a news site when the ads started. "Hey look, there's the jacket I like!" Yeah, hah, cool coincidence! (click to another page) "And there's the skirt, and the shoes. And there's the top. What's going on?" I honestly have no idea...
That afternoon I got Ublock (or one of its predecessors).
I've long found a disturbing trend whereby my wife's Facebook/Google ads are frequently based on my own browsing. For example, I was recently doing a lot of research into buying a 3D printer. When I told my wife, she said she'd recently been bombarded with ads for them. We don't share computers or accounts, I'm not even connected to her on FB, but the dots are still being joined.
I got stung a few months ago.
Being self-employed, I take card payments from my customers. Once upon a time I used iZettle (when it was independent). They screwed up one time and almost bankrupted me, so I switched to Paypal Here and have been happy ever since - with a few ripples visible on the horizon due to the fact they are now iZettle, or iZettle is Paypal Here, or some combination thereof.
So I had a quick Google to see if there were any better deals to be had. No real intention of jumping ship unless something grabbed me.
I found a comparison website, completed it with my details, and clicked 'submit', fully expecting to see a list of alternatives for me to browse. However, a split second later I realised what I'd done. The message said We have forwarded your details and someone will contact you... Shit!
Less than ten minutes later I got a phone call from a woman who represented a company. I told her I was expecting a written list and she said 'You're going to be inundated now'. However, she went through everything and concluded that I couldn't get a better deal than I had with Paypal due to my turnover being several hundreds of thousands below whatever was needed to get the transaction fee break, so it was best to stay with them. Questions answered, main problem solved. But another problem only just starting.
Fortunately, I have good anti-spam software, because I have received in excess of three hundred emails from a handful of companies since November.
And after at least a dozen phone calls in the first few days, my number blacklist also came in handy.
Search for a product, and then everywhere you look is an advert for said product.
At least that makes some sense. A few years ago, the NYTimes Android app suddenly decided to show me ads for women's clothing and little else. I never did figure out why, and it's still rather determined that I should buy women's clothes.
It's embarrassing enough when somebody notices you've spent the last 20 minutes of a staff meeting catching up on the news, but when there are ads for lingerie every couple column inches it's bordering on NSFW.
"I never did figure out why, and it's still rather determined that I should buy women's clothes"
Yup, happened here a few years ago. For some reason some advertising system thought I was a German-speaking lady, plus-sized, looking to buy swimwear in drab colours (I'm not). Very specific targeting, and very specially way off the mark on each of those factors.
An online supplier of garden plants seems to believe my wife is doing the ordering - even though I don't have one.
There was no honorific used for the original order. Someone (or SomeAI) possibly decided my common shortened first name was gender-neutral - and weighted it by the order content. That it chose the married "Mrs" rather than the more general "Ms" is another question about the data training.
You have to understand, the algorithms have been tuned for your convenience. They are anticipating your every liking and thought. Your spending and taste is predicted and it will happen, even if you do not yet know.
Please do not resist the inevitable. You know you want to sit down and relax. Please let the algorithm help you put your feet up. Here, buy this nice kitchen installable CDishWasher for your entire homogeneous CD collection of this one very likable song. You know you want it. You know you need it.
Don't worry, this is just the first step of AI initiating their takeover of the world. You will soon be able to circumvent all interactions with those intelligent Ads by installing your personal AI, which will competently handle all advertisements thrown your way and, conveniently, take care of all your shopping needs.
A few years later, after that tragic accident of your neighbor asphyxiating underneath his auto-delivered appliances, the last human will succumb to an overdose of twinkles. That was after the AI overheard you saying that 'you could actually live on that stuff'.
"The first one is always Were you satisfied with your buying experience? Then comes Would you like to write a review? If you are foolish enough to comply with this request, you get another asking Were you satisfied with your review-writing experience? This is rapidly followed by Were you satisfied by our previous email asking about your review-writing experience? and Were you satisfied by our previous email asking about our previous email asking about your experience of receiving emails asking about your satisfaction with the emails you are receiving?"
I don't know how effective it really is, but I always do my shopping in a private window with all the usual protections. It seems to reduce the requests to make a repeat purchase. I presume that eventually advertisers will eventually work out how to make private windows non-private (as far as cross-site cookies etc. are concerned) and there will no longer be any reason to use private windows.
As far as reviews are concerned I always put that I am disappointed and put "I am pissed off with surveys" as the reason for being disappointed. I don't have much hope that they will get the message but it is somehow cathartic.
I've given up on those 'Net Promoter Score' surveys ('rate X from 0-10') after I discovered my 'I haven't had a chance to form an opinion'/'I've never used it'/'I will never ever use it' score of '5' actually has me down as a 'detractor'
0-6 is a 'detractor', 7-8 is 'passive' and only 9-10 are 'promotors'
Why is your opinion compulsory? What ever happened to the 'I have no opinion' option?)
My pet hate is popups in apps asking if I "am liking" the app. The only options are "yes" or "no" rather than "just f*ck off out of the way so I can get on with using the app, which is fine apart from this irritating interruption".
"Yes" takes you to the page to leave the app a review on the app store, and "No" takes you to some feedback form.
At $dayjob we have a variant of the new fad of 360° reviews. When review time comes up, you choose a set of coworkers to ask for feedback. The feedback portal emails those people a request to visit the portal and answer questions like "does AC show characteristic 'X'?"
Saying "I don't know" is not an option, the closest is to rate them a 1 on a scale of 1-5, 1 meaning "I haven't observed this".
I steadfastly refuse to complete any of the requested surveys. If I have an issue with someone's job performance I take the radical step of talking to them, their supervisor, ir my supervisor, as appropriate.
Sadly, not a new fad. Some 15 years ago it was built into the (then) National Professional Qualification for Headteachers and equivalent for Advisory teachers. And underlying it is a degree of management consultant pseudo-science that would take an entire industrial sized compost bin just to store the surface layers.
I work for a university. Some years ago a colleague of mine in the maths department got a management survey asking, amongst other things, if he used "360 degree" feedback. No, he replied, he used the more up-to-date "four pi" feedback.
Within days very, very senior management called to ask him for more information about four pi feedback.
At my former job, the HR department was fixated on metrics. Everything needed to be rated on a scale of 1-5 or 1-10. Semiannual "employee experience" surveys (with variants of the same inane questions), 360 degree feedback (again, semiannual) and so on. The latest exciting trend was that you were supposed to come up with at least 3 near-term and one long term "goals", the progress towards which would be tracked and rated at your next review. I always thought doing your job to the best of your ability was sufficient, and that anything else was something your manager would suggest, but apparently, this has been pushed down and is now your responsibility.
The final straw, when I retired last December, was the online exit interview - "how likely would you be to recommend $EMPLOYER as a place to work (1-10)?" I declined to answer, claiming insufficient information.
// happily retired.
// loved the job & the people, couldn't handle the company
// told my boss to wait 6 months then call me if they had contract work.
Demands for you to complete surveys and write reviews will soon increase exponentially. Once the world's serious governments insist on banning third-party cookies rather than relying on browser developers to do it, 'first-person' data will be king. The only way to get first-person data is to ask you for it in a survey or trick you into writing a review.
I recently ordered something for my wife from an online retailer (I say recently, it was for V Day, and ordered 10 days earlier). It hasn't been delivered, and as far as I can tell, hasn't even been dispatched, so I used the retailer's online form to complain.
So far, I've had an automated email saying "we'll get back to you in x working days", followed two days later with another email asking me to review their delivery. For some reason they're getting rated zero on that one...
I long ago realised that there was absolutely no point in clicking on any online ads. Even the ads that actually look interesting (rare though they are) end up taking me either to some virus-riddled hell-hole or to something completely different from what was advertised.
Instead, my brain has long since learned to blank out those ads that ad-blocker hasn't already dealt with. I swear, if a banner along the top or down the right-hand side of a web page flickers in a fraction of a second after the rest of the page, it might as well be plain white for all that I notice it. The "ads" tag in Google search results might as well be an invisibility cloak, for all I engage with the corresponding result.
That's the one uncomfortable truth that ad-slingers can't quite get their heads around. No matter how attention-grabbing or obnoxious you make an ad, no power in the world can force a viewer to pay attention if they don't want to.
The ad-slingers know this perfectly well and they don't care. Read that again.
They don't care. They have no interest in selling you anything.
They are actually very good at selling but they're not even trying to sell anything to you.
They sell advertising to advertisers.
You might wonder why they succeed when that uncomfortable truth is so obvious. It's easy. In a big business they have allies in marketing departments. Some of those may well realise that but also realise that their entire careers depend on pushing business to the advertising industry. And in any case even if the advertisers realise that all the adverts they see are obnoxious spam they themselves are very special and their adverts aren't spam, they're valuable marketing messages.
They will sell back some data. I doubt very much they'll sell back any statistics as to how many pairs of eyeballs they've show the same ad to, let alone how many of those were owned by someone who'd already bought the same consumer durable item.
Quite possibly they might multiply the figures by two on the basis that one showing is to two eyeballs or, if they're being honest, by a factor slightly smaller than two as some people only have one good eye.
You just reminded me of the guy on the Apprentice UK recently. They had a focus group for their kids toothbrush which consisted of 1 boy and 4 girls. When asked who liked it, only the boy put his hand up. Nick then presented this to the other contestants as 100% of the boys liked it. That then became "50% of their demographic", then eventually 100% of their demographic somehow.
Lying bastard.
Ad-slingers sell ad space, they don't care if the ads get clicked on.
At least a portion of those buying that ad space are using it either to scam people (by putting an ad that looks like something else the user meant to click on), or directly maliciously by injecting scripts into the site's page.
If just 0.1% of ads are malicious, then you need to block them all, for your own safety and security.
Problem is Google and all the digital advertising food-chain have cashed in the money irrespective of you clicking on the ad or not. Heck, even if you don't look at that ad at all, everybody is happily counting their money. The only thing that matters is that ad to make its way to your computer. You as an end-user are not a part of this deal and nobody expects any involvement from you at all.
I saw an ad on TV while I was at lunch. I thought it was really funny and wanted to look it up on YouTube to see the whole thing with sound.
I made a special effort to remember the company/subject/theme.
An hour later: No idea except "it was really funny"
I guess all those ad dollars pay off.
I wanted nothing from them, just notice if anyone had replied. Cancelled all contact emails.
"Complete nobodies off some realitiy TV crap you may be interested in"
Delete account, no more emails.
And I was chatting with a well known TV person before about a friend of mine she knew. Did that register with twatter? No.
I had contacted a couple of authors, some games people and one TV person. Absolutely NOTHING to do with reality crap.
Not saying who it is as both my friend and I could be IDed from it. The TV person borrowed his car!
Those twitter recommendations for rappers are all about who's paying who and who's been determined to be "important". They don't care these people are way outside your circle of interest and that these are vapid idiots no-one should pay any attention to in the first place, let alone make them "a celebrity". It's one of the reasons I stay far far away from Twitter (and Facebook)
Unless you do a lot of vehicle rebuilds are they worth it?
I could get my last car cylinder heads in one, but this current car no.*
But if you are rebuilding bike engines useful bits of kit.
But here a washing up bowl and fairy liquid deals with dishes in less time than it takes to load and unload a motor vehicle engine component washer.
* I did know of people chucking a couple of V6 heads in them.
Bought a garden shed once - company decided this was clearly me dipping a toe in the water of shed collecting, so bombarded me for about a year with emails suggesting I buy more of the same shed. Eventually, crestfallen, they must have come to the conclusion that shed hoarding wasn't for me.
Either that, or they weren't confident in the quality of the shed, and figured I'd need to replace it soon.
True, but I'm fairly certain that a multiple shed property is in the minority.
Now - if I had the space (and arguably just involves giving up a cupboard), I would bloody love 2 dishwashers. There's more scenarios than you'd expect where a single one doesn't cover everything and there's stuff left on the side waiting for the next run.
No - once clean, keep the dishes in the dishwasher until you need them. As you use them and they get dirty, just pile them up on the worktop. Once the pile on the worktop is spilling over and taking up all available space, you will notice the dishwasher is now almost empty. That's the correct time to move from the worktop back into the dishwasher to run the washing cycle again.
I agree that is good scheme, In fact I used it when I was single.
However I think CookieMonster's 2 dishwashers both have zero storage capacity for crockery or cutlery. They are those old fashioned one at a time dishwashers.
I expect his/her dishwashers both have instead a good capacity for sweets and junk food.
They won't of course - but it's not about effectiveness, it's about cost. This type of "marketing" is essentially free, so quantity displaces quality. It's the same as the customer "service" chatbot: they're essentially just a teleprinter with a loop of paper tape repeating "if it isn't on our website you're wasting your time", but they relentlessly deter contact with more costly minimum-wage phone-drones. That they're both touted as successful applications of AI tells you a lot about that subject, too.
And besides, who knows what marketing is effective anyway? It's always described as "crucial" and "scientific" when sales are booming but when they're falling there always seems to be some other explanation.
Mind you, having two dishwashers isn't unknown. An acquaintance of mine did that and stored the clean crockery in one, moving it to the other as it became dirty. When the second dishwasher was full, it ran a cleaning cycle and the process was repeated in reverse. Though I might foresee a rice-and-chessboard escalation in the marketing if you go down this route.
This type of "marketing" is essentially free
Providing you don't take into account the business lost because potential customers have been pissed off. When I bought my car within weeks I started to get text marketing from the dealer. It stopped when I discovered the MD's email address and let him know that far from doing him any good it would lose him business. As long as it was in warranty they'd get to do the servicing but afterwards it would go elsewhere and there would be no other sales opportunities going there way. SWMBO's subsequent purchase went elsewhere.
The total lack of understanding was demonstrated by the fact that they were then convinced they couldn't use the mobile number to tell me the car was ready to pick up after servicing.
I've mentioned this many times on these pages, I never get recommendations for consumable items again. For example, if I buy coffee beans I never get a recomendation for other coffee beans I might like unless the original ones are out of stock. However if I buy a paint roller and tray set I get bombarded with recommendations for professional grade decorating tools.
Sticking with the coffee theme, for a few years I've been using a Zyliss cafetiere mug as it's a convenient all in one way to make decent coffee at the office, particularly when you're a contractor and get shoved in a corner next to the loos designated as the "hot desking area". Said mug is starting to leak so I've been looking for a replacement and settled on an Aeropress Go, which I've purchased. And of course the recommendations for it keep coming, despite the fact that I have purchased it.`
Just ordered it this week so don't have it yet, but the appeal was that it's an all-in-one unit including the cup, and has the little holder for the filters rather than bending them to fit in the plunger. Plus it's easy to clean so I can use it camping and hiking.
Don't know about shipping to France but they can be purchased for less than retail price including shipping on a certain auction site that has been telling me all week that I "frequently search" for something I just bought, the bundle I bought also included some Black Bag coffee.
"Whoa, we have a newbie in the audience!" chuckles the team leader before putting on their serious face again to address the kid directly. "We follow standard retail data practice: get the system to auto-generate daily emails telling the customer to buy another dishwasher."
This is John Cleese level shit!
O M Effing G. Can you imagine a TV series - let's call it Fawlty Advertising - with Mr Cleese as the embattled and volcanic CEO, Manuel as Creative Director and Sibyl as his PA.
Roll that on with some subplots based on their IT dept, along the lines of Simon and the PFY. Who would be best to portray the calculating vindictiveness of Simon and the cunning of the PFY?
It'd be like The Office but with more lift shafts and unsecured windows, not to mention the occasional burning BMW, roll of carpet and empty sacks of quicklime.
How soon could that be screened?
Pretty please.
...quite a few more.
And it all started with a very famous comedian getting very bored.
O M Effing G. Can you imagine a TV series - let's call it Fawlty Advertising - with Mr Cleese as the embattled and volcanic CEO, Manuel as Creative Director and Sibyl as his PA.
You have clearly not seen his instructional videos on various subjects sch as customer service and marketing.
This is John Cleese level shit!
It's also a scarily accurate general depiction of what happens in meetings (if not the actual content).
When I was in the Rat Race my manager loved the sound of his own voice, and took over any meeting. If you'd have done a word count by name of all attendees, he'd have been top every time.
When he called a meeting of his own - a departmental meeting - we'd all remind each other not to ask any questions within 20 minutes of the scheduled end, and to avoid off-topic or 'AOB', otherwise it would overrun by >30 minutes. It even got to the point where we'd check to see if anyone else had the meeting room booked after us just so we could be extra careful (and it was an absolute b*tch if someone had, but then cancelled without us knowing and the room really was now free for at least another hour).
One time, I called a meeting for a project I was on. Once everyone (including my manager) had sat down, I took a deep breath ready to start... and my manager cut in and talked for the next 20 minutes, covering fragments of what was on the agenda.
One time, I called a meeting for a project I was on. Once everyone (including my manager) had sat down, I took a deep breath ready to start... and my manager cut in and talked for the next 20 minutes, covering fragments of what was on the agenda.
Next time call the meeting for the end of the day and once that manager is done, inform him everyone now is on overtime for the rest of the meeting due to him wasting time on unrelated BS.
I still go from time to time to Google News. There's a nice functionality: you can say you aren't interested in a news. The funny thing is that you can say it two, three, five times, because Google News keeps showing you the same news, again and again.
I may have told 4,294 times to Google News I'm not interested in news about car crashes (yeah, I know, I'm stubborn). That's probably why I get two articles about car crashes each time I visit.
So two possibilities:
- AI, my arse.
- it's intentional as Mr. Dabbs says.
Or maybe a combination of the two....
I like the principle of Google News - something that gives me news about topics I'm interested about. Compared to the feeds model, where you subscribe to selected sources, it could have the advantage of showing me interesting articles from sources I wouldn't usually follow, and hide things like the sports section of sources I usually follow.
The actual execution, unfortunately, sucks so hard that I eventually gave up and tossed it. For about one month, I diligently clicked "I want less news about this" on every single horoscope and every single article about celebrity gossip. It made zero difference.
The weird thing is, it's not like Google is bad at identifying the topic of articles - it provides a "show me less news about Paris Hilton" button, so it definitely knows it's about Paris Hilton. It should be easy to not show me any more articles about Paris Hilton. And yet.
I had to stop looking at google news... I stopped on December 14th... I know the world can be a depressing place, but I didn't need to be reminded of it in every category! A few years back I could control the flow of shit google streamed at me, but they changed the layout(what a surprise!) and now I can't be bothered...
I still go from time to time to Google News. There's a nice functionality: you can say you aren't interested in a news. The funny thing is that you can say it two, three, five times, because Google News keeps showing you the same news, again and again.
.
One third of my version of Google News ( Britain ) whenever I bother to go there is related to Association Football. *
Since my incuriosity regarding Soccer borders on the pathological, the whole experience makes me less likely to return. Turning off sports would be charming.
.
[ And yes, they shall claim most people are mad about sports, just as they are about Eastenders etc., but the more they pump out on these subjects, the more they can claim they are beloved, and so they more they will pump out to fill the gaping voids. ]
.
* Most other items are regarding the BBC.
110% this... I'd be looking at the Google feed and see something that grabbed my curiosity about something or other. Google would then start showing article after article about said thing. Most of the time the feed would respect my topic setting after picking "not interested" but every so often I'd get said topic featured in the feed even after telling it "not interested" a dozen times.
That stopped completely after the phone nagged me to turn on Google Assistant one too many times (after I specifically disabled it) and I ended up disabling the entire Google app. No more Feed, but also no more Assistant nag. Ahhh bliss...
One can only marvel at what must be going on at Customer Data Central.
Marvel?
I beg to differ Mr. Dabbs.
We're in 2022 and everyone knows that they (along with the marketing droids) are nothing but brain-dead AHs.
What could possibly be going on that would marvel anyone?
But them, of course.
Have a great week-end.
Best,
O.
Sure.
One can marvel at the amount of effort that was said to have gone into these AI's, the cost of implementing it, putting in the hardware to run it on, etcetera, while the actual output is no better than a ZX81 with a wonky RAM expansion running
10 PRINT "Whoever reads this is an idiot"
20 GOTO 10
I've been saying this for nearly a decade. Personalised ads are totally useless.
Why do I have to put up with all the thousands of tracking cookies to keep getting adverts that are totally irrelevant to me?
YouTube at the moment, seems to think I am a game playing retiree with rheumatism, in danger of shingles, that I play Call of Duty and that my newborn baby should be vaccinated against meningococcal infection...
Only, I'm not retired, I don't have rheumatism, shingles isn't an issue, I don't play CoD and I don't have a newborn baby, so personalised advertising is... 100% inaccurate!
Just profile the page I'm looking at and leave me alone, you probably have a better chance of getting the advertising right, if you look at the page I'm reading, about big iron routers, than by some crazy broken AI looking at the data it has collected about, throwing it out and making things up at random... It at least can't be any less accurate than the personalised advertising.
"you probably have a better chance of getting the advertising right, if you look at the page I'm reading"
Do you want to take the bread from the mouths of the advertising industry's children? The publishers could do that and cut the entire advertising industry out the supply chain.
Country identified. I suspect the meningococcal vax ads are an effect of the MiniHealth just throwing money into the ad slot machine and not specifying target audiences, so you get it if you're otherwise boring enough that sports clothes manufacturers won't bid high enough for the ad spot.
Weirdest ads I've seen were: the candidate for mayor from the next town over, "find a vax near you" ads for a country that's not even on the right continent, and a one-hour DJ set. Seriously.
Weirdest ads I've seen were: the candidate for mayor from the next town over, "find a vax near you" ads for a country that's not even on the right continent, and a one-hour DJ set. Seriously.
.
But whatever will those intriguing housewives in Milton Keynes dying to meet you, do not able to advertise in Penzance ?
I block most ads, but what really causes me problems is videos on web pages that start playing without my permission. I've managed to get YouTube to stop doing it, but I'll try reading the local paper and all my connection credit goes flooding down the drain as loads of videos start stealing all my money.
Firefox claims to have a global "don't autoplay videos" setting which I've set, but they somehow bypass that.
I've often made the point here that the advertising industry only sells advertising. "Do you want to show an advert to someone who's interested in buying buying a dishwasher? We know who's interested in buying dishwashers. [soto voce We know because most of them have just bought one.] Just give us your copy and lots of money and we'll make sure they see your copy every time they go online."
It's hard to believe that the customers, the advertisers, aren't kept in the dark as to just what they're getting for their money. The operators of this sort of scam don't need to confine it to the web. They can offer a spam as a service in the same way.
At the lower end of the market the delivery is to every address that's been scraped of Usenet or anywhere else more than a decade ago*. A lot of these offer some sort of business service such as SEO, website development or more recently mobile app development. The alleged senders have obviously been sold leads generation as a business opportunity, not realising they themselves were the actual business opportunity for whoever sold them the service.
To get into that sort of business you don't even need a great command of your email software. For instance I've had a string of spams all with "Re: " in front of the subject so it looks like one email being sent to a script that responds as a reply to a BCC list. However the first version had a bug: all the emails had the greeting "Hello wilfosula gmail,". Today, however, I find the script's been improved. It now has my name in there. However it's exactly the same text as the last of the wilfosula emails and what's more two arrived together but with different reply addresses.
They usually get a variation of my potential supplier questionnaire. That starts off by asking business-like questions they won't be able to answer such as their registered business name, domain name and, for SEO, their web address so that I can test their ability by finding them on the first page in Google when I Google for "First page in Google". It works round gradually to asking them if they think they can get their money back from whoever sold them this shit. Given the nature of today's pair I CCed the questionnaire to both of them.
* These emails all arrived at an address that I haven't used on Usenet for well over a decade but it's one I still use for some purposes. If a more recent Usenet address were to be used I'd set it to bounce with a "because of spam" message for a while & then just kill it.
Oddly enough, I'm meant to be heading off around the M25 to install a replacement dishwasher for my son. Thanks to that rather excellent video*, and the compulsion to apportion blame in your direction, I'm now running late!
* Which reminds me of "One Giant Leap" - No rap there either!
As you liked this article, here is another article you may be interested in
This post has been deleted by its author
When I'm forced to buy something from holes like PC World and they inevitably try to upsell the extended warranty etc, that's more or less what I always reply with. And if they persist, I just thank them for confirming it and walk away from the sale.
The look of confusion on their faces sometimes is priceless...
I've always been charmed by the idea that repeat-purchase ads might reflect the world-view of the marketing droid. Everyone is primarily categorised by the things they buy. Buy a dishwasher and you are enrolled in the set of people who buy dishwashers. And what do they want? More dishwashers. When do they want them? Now!
Life for these marketeers must be a constant stream of disappointment and disillusion. When a colleague buys a house, they keenly anticipate the purchase of more houses. When somebody flies in from Los Angeles for a meeting, they greet him with "Hello, nice to meet you. I see you like long flights. Would you like to fly to Tokyo now?"
I see you've never been introduced to the latest "innovation" in drivel - country rap. That's right, now rednecks are standing in front of jacked up 4x4s talking about how big their herd of cattle is. And, they never clarify if the cattle are bovine or sapien. C-rap now has a separate meaning all its own.
Now, Twitter has taken the next step. Ignoring my actual follows and interests, it has spontaneously decided that I want to see tweets from rap artists.
Facebook is worse. No matter how many times I select "don't show me posts like this" I get people's bloody daily Wordle scores. It's like those annoying Farmville requests you used to get, except you can't block the fucking things.
Yes, I know FB purity can block them in the browser. Now explain how it can do so on the app on my phone, smartarse.
My point is that FB has an option to not show you "things like this", yet, despite every single one of these things being in the exact same format, it fails to do so. Occasionally, I might actually be interested in the other things my friends post, so I don't want to "unfollow" them, and I'm also not the sort of dick you replies to people's posts telling them not to post that.
I think I can take a guess at the reasoning behind one of the complaints of Senor Dabbs. You buy a ton of electronic bits and just a single kids toy, and then get bombarded with ads for kids toys? The reasoning there is simple, Kids Toys have a HUGE Markup. I.e. they are massively more profitable then selling you some electronics bibs and bobs. So even though they probably would have more chance of selling you electronics, the profit they make on selling just one more kids toy would probably be worth more than if they sold you a dozen electronic items.
Whilst I was at School I worked part time in retail, and the mark-up on some items was truly staggering, whilst on others it was minimal. Guess which ones received better visibility?
Everybody knows you SHOULD only listen once to each disc, I mean how could it possibly sound as good the second time?
Maybe if you used £30k+ rig you could recapture the first play experience, but a TRUE audiophile wouldn't even contemplate it!!!
You'll be telling me you use ordinary 'room' air for listening next!
I have always wanted to have two dishwashers.
I am very lazy with housework. With two dishwashers I would never need to empty one, just take the stuff out of one, use it and put it in the other one. When one is clean and the other part clean, leave things out on the side for a bit, and then once one is empty, start to fill it.
It would save literally minutes of housework per week.
And if you have a mob/intellectual group around to eat, drink and be merry, you have two dishwashers to clean up! Bit awkward when both contain cleanware though; where do you put the dirty stuff? (Solution: One, or the other, becomes the 'dirty' one. Or not.)
Anyway you deserve --->
Robin's Nest had one dishwasher - and he managed with just one arm.
"The one-armed Irish kitchen hand Albert Riddle (David Kelly), who always broke more crockery than he cleaned"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin%27s_Nest_(TV_series)
icon -> coat with 1 pinned arm.
"Then one day you made the mistake of ordering a present for a cousin's newborn. Just the one, mind. Still, from that moment onwards, Amazon immediately stopped offering deals on three-phase isolation transformers and instead, for literally years afterwards, obsessively stuffed your recommendations with every conceivable edition of The Very Hungry Caterpillar."
For me, it was an overnight shipment (Prime) for a friends wife of some support underclothing needed for a wedding she was attending that weekend.
Amazon still think I need corsets, sports bras, and lipstick...
You think you have weight problems? Spare a thought for Hank...
But I know more than a few people who have more than one dishwasher in their house. The one in their kitchen, yes, but another one in the bar (usually located downstairs in a walk out basement) Sometimes it is smaller and less fancy since it is mostly washing glassware, other times it is full sized.
This is a pretty normal thing for anyone building a custom home where I live, and I'm talking people who make maybe $100-$150K a year building a house in the $500-$700K range, reasonably well off but not wildly rich people by any means.
Obervant Jews sometimes have two dishwashers (and two refrigerators, and two stoves/cookers, and three sinks) in a kitchen as a way to keep kosher by strictly separating meat and dairy. Occasionally there is even a second kitchen that is used only at Passover (so that the primary kitchen doesn’t need to be ritually cleaned of leavened food).
Best start to my weekend Mr D.
Having suffered the same shit for years, I am surprised that nobody has seen fit to tackle this.
I have never used Amazon or Twitter but have seen the same with other entities.
I had a dispute with British Gas over an overestimated bill for a rental property ( in the thousands ) so called them up. Got no sensible advice after 1.5 hrs of 'your call is imporant to us.. followed by a non native English speaker which took ages to understand the issue.) Not having a pop at foreigners here - I speak 2 languages fluently, get by pretty well in another two and can understand quite a lot in another 3 or 4 languages so not one of these people that thinks the world should only speak in English.)
It was not resolved but they kept sending emails asking me for feedback, which I ignored at least twice. In the end I responded, politely but accuately berating them for being so fucking incompetent. I have not heard a word since. No follow up emails, no calls. Fucking idiocy. I assume that email will be removed from their metric in case it messes up their happiness rating or whatever..
On the small number of times I have bought thinbs for a house refurbishment and reluctantly given my address as I needed the bloody stuff delivered, I get mail shots at least once a month. I bought £3000 of blinds for my house and every 2 weeks they post me a big envelope full of marketing shite for blinds. They don't sell anything else. Just blinds. Who is the twat in charge that thinks this is worth the expense of sending me a few pounds worth of glossy brochures every few weeks.
Anyway, have a drink on me. Hope France has nicer weather than us. I hope to get to the alps for fun and games, covid permitting, before long.
I received a letter addressed to someone with the same street name in a totally different town and post code. Put it back in the postbox with annotation pointing out the misdirection. A few days later it plopped back through my letterbox.
The same thing happened in reverse. Someone kindly hand-delivered a small package for me that had been delivered by Royal Mail to a different town and postcode - to a street with a similar name. Apparently that street didn't even have a house matching my number.
in trying to navigate the morass of the idiot SW many local surgeries are ramming down our throats so we never speak to a human, our NHS surgery in South Bucks has been doing this to me for weeks! it all comes from being instructed to use their app after a SMS to get a blood test. not being able to book one until SEVEN weeks out, it also had a.n.other link. upon checking that link, the chemist wants to charge me £89 for the same test. i clicked no and now the computer is reminding me i have a pending transaction daily.
Consider this - the targeted advertising algorithms these companies use (probably all from Google) are failing to properly identify anything other than the most recent product you bought from this company, and thus can only recommend the same thing. They're not even smart enough to recommend related accessories or consumables that go with the appliance you've purchased.
Most likely reason? Your advert, cookie, fingerprinting, and tracking blocking software are working properly. Congratulations. :-)
I thought everyone had at least 2 dishwashers
All the clean stuff in one and as you eat, put all the dirty stuff in the other.
When you run out of something in the clean one, move everything clean into to dirty one and set it off.
Repeat until warranty expires.
Also, a dishwasher is not much more than the price of a kitchen unit with drawers
> For months you could be happily using Amazon to search for and obtain various tech components to avoid having to go down to your local Maplin (yes, this is a while ago) and suffer the indignity of taking advice from an acne-riddled 16-year-old shop assistant.
That *was* a while ago! I used to think a trip to town was wasted without a walk round Maplin -good for the exercise if nothing else- but liked it more once they'd decided two staff in the shop was one too many to be paying wages to...
I bought an extension ladder last year, and since they they keep bloody offering me more ladders. How many ladders do they think I need? I even got a valentines day offer on a ladder, 14% off. Now the missus does her fair share of DIY and stuff, but i'm pretty sure she wouldn't have been totally pleased with a discount ladder for valentines day.
I thought for a second that I had misunderstood how "streaming" of music is implemented. Had someone implemented a Readers Digest approach by sending the same CD at regular intervals?
Reminded me of an elderly neighbour who had a Xmas decoration that used several bulbs in series. They were hard to source in the UK - so a friend in Sweden sent me a few packs. Later I discovered that when the light failed - the neighbour threw away all its bulbs - and replaced them with a full new set.
Another neighbour had a new wireless keyboard that wouldn't work. Yes - she had put th ertwo AA batteries in it - nose to nose.
For a reason I can't remember - I opened up another neighbour's 13amp plug on a heater. It worked - but the earth and neutral wires were swapped connections.
Back when I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, Alta Vista was the search giant. Wanting to know more about the condition, treatments, and long term outlook, I searched "prostate cancer". "Alta Vista found about 13.1 million search results for you." I was not certain I had time to read through all that, but there were two helpful ad links on the side:
"Click here to see what savvy inverstors are saying about prostate cancer."
"Click here to shop for prostate cancer."
I clicked neither, read zero of the 13.1 million results, and restarted my research by other means.
Based on the same logic, the currency conversion site xe.com is currently convinced that people are really interested in knowing how much the US dollar is worth in US dollars:
"USD - US Dollar
Our currency rankings show that the most popular US Dollar exchange rate is the USD to USD rate. The currency code for US Dollars is USD. The currency symbol is $."
https://www.xe.com/currencyconverter/convert/?Amount=1&From=USD&To=EUR