Blue Christmas
Wait, what? *Now* you tell me I should have ordered a new bigger monitor for Christmas? I figured everything 'd be priced out of reach still!
Hmmm, oh well, I suppose that'll make for a happy new year, even if not a Happy New Year.
For the first time since the global pandemic began, the PC monitor market has shown a year-on-year decline, according to analyst firm International Data Corporation (IDC) last week. The 7.2 percent year-on-year decline in Q3 2021 resulted in a little over 34.8 million units making their way out of factories. The decline …
I've been running dual monitors on both my PCs for years until a couple of weeks ago when one of my cats managed to jump on top of one monitor and kick it over so that its face hit the mouse. On first inspection there didn't even appear to be a scratch on the monitor's screen surface. Then I turned it on and discovered that, beneath the surface, the LED part of the screen had shattered!
Absent cats (or toddlers) monitors can last for many years longer than the PCs that drive them.
The last significant development was 4k and it's been around for years.
So once you've got 2 4k monitors there's no reason to upgrade for a long time (unless you're a gamer seeking 8k which is a much smaller market).
There's more to it than resolution - refresh rates have got higher, panel technology better (so more colour coverage, contrast etc) and also Freesync/G-Sync for gamers.
But I wouldn't disagree with a general sentiment of stalling development, at least compared to TVs, where we've seen LCD get better at HDR, and OLED get cheaper and better over the past few years.
I assume a main reason for lack of OLED in the monitor market is the burn-in issue which PC use would definitely trigger vs video/consoles.
As I type this on my computer, I am looking at a pretty decent monitor. When I click a few buttons on the remote, I am looking at a television. The only fly in the ointment is poor speakers. It has other tricks I have not explored, and it's about as large as my desk can accommodate. Why should I buy something else?
My big WFH upgrade was a single 4k monitor, but 43". Its like having 4 x regular sized monitors in one, and my laptop can drive it, another external 1080p screen and the internal display no problem, so its like having 6 regular screens.
Weirdly, I got this at the start of lockdown in 2020 for £380, its a proper iiyama monitor - just IPS, I'm not gaming on it - but now there doesn't seem to be anything in this style anymore. I think if you want something like that, its got to be a TV now.
Its a real pain when I go back to the office and its just a single external 1080p screen and the laptop, I'm used to my vast amounts of data on screen now.
Got a scratched 40" HD TV for 50p! The scratch is not visible when its on and it does 1024*768 beautifully. Only problem is its best viewed from about 6' which is great for the eyes but it does take up a lot of real estate and the missus wont let me put the 4hd TV up with it partly because that would need another dining table! I will take it out to the man shed to experiment with dual monitoring with a smaller closer monitor as I've go an itch to dig out some old php web programming stuff which has suddenly become relevant.
Most of the ones I've seen are just some variant of 1080p - either re-cased 1920x1080p panels, or absurd aspect ratios with a bajillion horizontal pixels but still the same 1080 vertical that I had on my first LCD monitor in about 2002. To get usable vertical resolution - ie, usable for more than watching Youtube - $500-600 seems to still be the ballpark.
I'm currently rocking a 3440x1440 Acer X34, which I have to say is a good monitor, except for the fact that it really doesn't play nicely with my crappy AMD graphics (craphics?) card, and will lose sync just about every time the screen resolution changes. Doesn't have any problems at all with the Intel graphics on my other PC, so.. *shrug*
I started out as a field engineer when 14" CRTs where still on many desks, and even back then it's wasn't unusual for PCs to be upgraded and not the screens. Likewise, it's not that long ago I was still seeing 14/"15" LCD screens on desks, albeit often in pairs. One customer I deal with just upgraded from pairs of 17" screens to some humongously wide curved screens. I suspect they will be there through at least the next two or three PC refreshes.
I well remember these days, even though I was a youngun. Screen technology struggles to improve as rapidly as PC technology (which also frankly isn't moving as fast as it used to). If you want to save some money, buying a good monitor to start with and not worrying about upgrading is an easy way to do so.
Addendum:
A couple weeks ago I replaced my top-end 2007 Sony XBR2 television with a top-end 2021 Sony A90J.
Yes, the new TV is clearly superior in all areas (except in brightness and burn-in concerns, because OLED) and I am happy for the upgrade. But is it 13 years better? Probably not...certainly not in the same way that my 6800XT is superior to a 2007 GeForce 8800 Ultra, or a Ryzen 5000 is superior to a Core 2.
Those PC upgrade examples are comical, the old parts would now be considered effectively unusable for anything (power and heat concerns basically invalidate them for any use they would still be capable of). OTOH, this change between TVs for me has merely been "a nice improvement". And the old XBR? Going to a recent grad, who will undoubtedly get many more years of high quality, trouble free service out of it.
Monitor manufacturer usually won't show where the monitor was made. Often you will also find that maybe monitor was assembled outside of China, but e.g. the panel and majority of components are actually Chinese.
Problem is that you rather won't find that out unless you disassemble the monitor and look up the part numbers. At that point you likely won't be able to return the device.
So what's the solution?
If you don't want to fuel the communist party, then only way for now is to buy used.
And next year, because of the way stock markets work, watch the "tech crash" as all the tech companies making hay for two years of WFH all see sales drops instead of growth because, as per the article, the peak has passed and now it's just "normal" refreshes. It doesn't even matter if sales are better than two years ago, all "the market" will see is a drop from the artificially induced sharp rises of the last two years.
Standard financial term. The alternatives are generally monthly/quarterly/annual being straight growth between 2 sequential periods ; yoy which is this subperiod compared with the same subperiod last year (eg Q3 2021 / Q3 2020) which controls for seasonality so is usually preferred ; or CAGR cumulative annual growth rate over a few years which is what you're thinking of : total growth averaged/annualised to an equivalent annual rate (take the Tth root / raise to the power of 1/T).
My friends' daughter needed a monitor in a hurry for WFH at the start of lockdown. So I gave her my 24" IPS 1920x1080 used for general viewing with my laptop. My big PC doesn't get used much these days - so moved one of its pair of Samsung 26" 1920x1200 to the laptop. The extra depth is much nicer - especially as my bilateral cataracts now appear to be slipping down the NHS queues.
At work I have a standard sized monitor, I think 24". Eventually we'll all get 2 monitors.
At home I'm using a 40" 4K Samsung TV as a second screen connected to my 13" work laptop.
The TV has multiple HDMI ports, so I also connected my own 17" laptop and can switch inputs using the remote.
Note: a standard HDMI cable didn't work reliably -- I had periodic blackouts of the screen.
A purchase of a premium HDMI cable rated for 4K bandwidth solved that issue.
Q.1
You can
A) work in a tumbleweed office, without any of your team onsite, with your laptop screen and a single clapped out monitor without a HDMI port, ON A DOUBLE MONITOR ARM...
Or
B) work at home with laptop, portrait and landscape monitors with a choice of modern interfaces, on a double arm.
A. Wait, I know this...
Since August I have two 55" 4K TVs on my desk as displays, powered by a PC each. I have only ever had dual monitors at work, at home it is nicer to have a single computer for every screen.
Realistically, they do not make desks that fit anything bigger, and I am uncertain about replacing my desk with a dining room table...
Although, then I could fit a third computer and screen, and once again play two player network games with the middle one showing videos for distractions...
Sure, purpose made monitors are probably higher quality, but luckily for me, I can not tell the difference, so El Cheapo TVs are perfectly okay with me to watch computers on...
I needed to replace a 22" monitor and ideally wanted something bit larger, and likewise ended up getting a 27" curved TV (the desk it went on didn't really accomodate anything larger) at probably less than half the price of equivalent monitor. Picture via HDMI is perfectly fine. The only annoyance is the energy saving "press a button or the tv will turn off" every so often.
OT:
> Shipments of models aimed at consumers shrank an average of 12 per cent.
I had to read that 3 times before what was weird about it finally registered.
I think you're about the first journo I've seen in maybe a year who's been able to use the past tense correctly on a i/a/u verb! You little ripper!
'Course, now it's bugging me that I can't remember the proper term for those verbs.... :)