
Astronaut wings should only go out to people professionally employed as astronauts who have completed one complete orbit around the Earth. No space tourists allowed.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is ending its Commercial Space Astronaut Wings programme, citing waning exclusivity. "The Astronaut Wings program, created in 2004, served its original purpose to bring additional attention to this exciting endeavour," said FAA associate administrator Wayne Monteith, adding: "Now it's …
I tend to agree with you. Maybe they should have had 2 versions. The existing one for the pilots, and one with folded wings for the tourists. The main problem with the scheme is that makes no distinction between getting 50 miles above the earth's surface for a few minutes, and actually getting to a stable orbit,
I feel like there is something to be said for raising the bar for the astronaut wings to the orbital level. I also agree that their should be a distinction between flight crew, and passengers. The pilots for Virgins joy ride sled clearly aren't passive ballast on their flights, and deserve recognition like military pilots that are operating at altitude but on suborbital trajectories.
I feel like passengers should get recognition for completing meaningful science or technical roles as well, but tourists, even orbital ones, shouldn't get the same honors as the flight crew.
Airplane pilots get wings, passengers get a complementary drink and some salty nuts. Though that would make a funny mission patch I guess.
...Virgin's joy ride sled should be a special case... anyone who has the guts to [climb aboard] deserves some form of recognition.
There is always the Darwin Awards. Maybe create a category for special effort?
*Mine's the one with a dog-eared copy of On the Origin of Species in the pocket.
I think you have missed that not all crew fly their craft.... to differentiate between those being paid to be there and those paying to be there is a little harsh.
that said, ending the current scheme and replacing with a new one that pushes the envelope further is the righ thing to do.
"makes no distinction between getting 50 miles above the earth's surface for a few minutes, and actually getting to a stable orbit"
Exactly. Going up 50 miles and coming back down again is roughly the rich-person's version of a little kiddie's bounce-house. Rides on the Vomit Comet provide roughly the same entertainment, last longer, and are a hell of a lot cheaper. These folks are just passengers. Perhaps a patch with a sack of potatoes on it?
> Astronaut wings should only go out to people professionally employed as astronauts who have completed one complete orbit around the Earth.
One complete orbit? A tourist could do that without much training.
I'd rather it say: Played an operational role on board a vehicle capable of EVA which reached stable orbit (or beyond).
(i.e. you need to be properly trained on the operation of a fucking complicated vehicle, in the same way as a pilot of a commercial airliner who might've earned the FAA's original badge)
Well, in keeping with the commercialisation of space, why should the FAA have a monopoly on the granting of wings? Simply send 10 bitcoin and you'll be issued your wings. Assuming I can attach a pair to Blue Origin's thruster without breaching obscenity laws. But then I guess BO and SpaceX can sell their own commemorative ones anyway.
Personally, I think the FAA should keep them, but tighten the criteria to orbits and beyond.