So near, so Spar
"So near, so Spar" used to be their advertising strapline in the UK. Sounds like it applies to their IT security as well.
The British arm of Dutch supermarket chain Spar has shut hundreds of shops after suffering an "online attack," the company has confirmed to The Register. "This has not affected all SPAR stores across the North of England," a Spar spokesman told us, "but a number have been impacted over the past 24 hours and we are working to …
Today I was telling my wife of my great idea for holiday get-togethers. Instead of politics or religion or other boring subjects, charge up the party conversation with the question "How many of your credit cards have had to be replaced over the last 5 years?" I think we're personally heading for 2 per year.
Zero in 20 years.
What the hell are you guys doing to have to replace your credit cards?
Are we talking theft? Destruction? Compromise?
Because I've been mostly cashless since about 2000 and entirely since 2009 or so and never had to do anything with my credit cards.
>Today I was telling my wife of my great idea.... Instead of politics or religion or other boring subjects, charge up the party conversation with the question "How many of your credit cards have had to be replaced over the last 5 years?"
Wow- that's one lucky lady. Who needs Ryan Gosling.
This post has been deleted by its author
Cash is king? I tend to agree from the point of security. The sudden plethora of 'card machines' that don't look like card machines ...
"Just bonk your card please ... sorry, can you insert your card as we have successfully taken a photo of your signature and a cvv and just need to skim the other information ..."
Something like 45% of people using cash during the pandemic in the UK were refused at some point.
Sorry, but your paper money is not the solution.
The solution is a robust electronic system with - shock, horror - a failover system that can process payments, your ONLY source of income. Your most business-critical system. Your bread-and-butter.
But no, rather than issue stores with a bunch of iZettles for use in such circumstances, even if it costs you an extra % on the processing fee, Spar would rather be entirely offline whenever their system is down and unable to serve a single customer.
Electronic money is all there will be in the future. Money laundering laws have seen to that. Put cash under your mattress and then try to pay it into your bank in bulk? They legally need to know where that came from, which means you have to prove it.
Given that 90% of your bills will be direct-debit or card-based anyway (unless your really do walk up to British Gas counters and try to pay in cash still), I'm afraid you're already entirely reliant on electronic banking, and it will only ever "get worse".
I live a cashless life, and I've given my daughter (who lives in Spain) a child's credit card. Everyone laughed. Pandemic hit. They can send her money from another country, we can track her spending from across the continent, and her Christmas gifts are basically impossible to send her without - as happened on her birthday - almost €300 of collective customs charges, or an awful lot of disputes and hassle. This Christmas, she's getting electronic money on her card from all... including the stalwart grandparents who keep hoarding their cash thinking that helps them.
My daughter is not going to understand people using cash in her future. You're literally in a technological dead-end, like lamp-lighters, horse-drawn-carriages and faxes. You can admit it, or you can pretend it hasn't already happened. Because unless I'm very much mistaken here, I bet that the majority of your gas, electricity, telephone, Internet, rent/mortgage, council tax, entertainment, car tax, car insurance, etc. are done electronically. I bet you even use card when paying for your petrol, because I see vanishingly few people ever using cash.
That is indeed the current situation, but the question is whether it ought to be. There are very good reasons for having cash retained as at least a back up - it maximises resilience, as demonstrated in this case. Cards/electronic payments are a significant point of failure in a number of different ways. Cash doesn't fail in anything like as many ways.
Payment systems go down - be it retailers, the banks / card processors.
Cash allows purchases when electronic methods are broken (and in some cases outages can be a while, e.g. Spar - & if you think Spar problems are trivial consider lots of UK people do not have their own transport and live away from major shopping areas, so for many a Spar (or similar expensive smallish shop) provides a lot of their day to day household shopping needs (& as a side effect contributes to cycle of poverty - inability to travel to cheaper shops with better range of goods (no car, bus or taxi exceeds budget) means more expensive food & poorer choice) .
There have been plenty of occasions when cash has been my only payment option due to card payment outages, and lots of small independent shops (though sadly COVID sent a lot to the wall) add surcharge to card payments below a certain amount to cover their processing fees.
Another benefit of cash is not being tracked, partner & I have joint account, using cash means no trace of card use when I visit a shop to buy a present for them(if there was bank debit record from a jewellers for example then surprise gift would be a non surprise )
Some people cannot have a UK bank account, even a basic one, so e.g. stuck with PO account to receive benefits which has a card but only allows its use to withdraw cash from the PO. So for some no option but to only use cash - the choice of non cash payments is not open to all.
There used to be a backup system.
Using embossed card copiers, in fact the process that was used to take card payments before electronics got involved.
A cashier would rummage below the counter and pull out a big old chunky device.
Your card would be laid on the device and then more rummaging and a carbon paper triplicate thing would be found, that resembled a long forgotten airline ticket formant.
The triplicate carbon thing would laid atop the card and then a sliding roller thing would be pulled across the whole thing and back. This would create a copy of the card on the triplicate form.
Which you would then sign. Cashier would visually compare the signature with the one on the back of the card.
Then you would be handed a semi-transparent leaf from the carbon triplicate thing and your purchase is complete.
if their network is down then likely no tills working as they either won't work offline, can't check barcodes or will be using out of date prices.
so they may not even be able to accept cash,
if the store accept cash and dispense goods, perhaps perishables, then the subsequent audit for insurance purposes will show inconsistencies and perhaps trigger fraud cases.
in a dystopian scenario then cash would truly be king as there would be no repercussions.
The problem is not credit cards. It is arcane payment terminals from the middle ages that are used in the UK.
In modern countries, the payment terminals can work in offline mode for at least a few thousand transactions. Of course there is a risk that payment will then be declined, but that is a risk that the store likely want to take if the alternative is losing business altogether.
Given what I've seen on Sainsbury's online shopping site over the past couple of years, I'm pretty sure the cybercrims have been running their web interface all that time. They really should either catch them, or pay them off, or something, rather than just let them keep making such a hash of their website.
The focus of discussion is about their credit card systems doing down, implying it's just the payment system. There was mention of the tills being down, so that's possibly why some sites have had to close if they can't process stock. The ones accepting cash may just be putting the money in a bucket and not worrying about stock control etc.
It seems that their website is also down along with their distribution and manufacturing systems. That's likely quite a diverse set, so presumably either someone has 'pushed the right button' of some core system or they have purposely shut everything down to limit the spread from one initial problem.