back to article Project Union: Microsoft releases Windows App SDK 1.0, developers try to puzzle it out

Microsoft released the Windows App SDK 1.0 earlier this month, the first full release of "Project Reunion", but there is some confusion about what it is and whether developers need it. The release of the Windows App SDK was associated with the arrival of .NET 6.0, a long-term release of Microsoft's application platform, but it …

  1. druck Silver badge
    Facepalm

    They really haven't got a clue, have they.

    1. Brewster's Angle Grinder Silver badge

      It sounds like it wouldn't have been released if it was up to the dev team. Is that why it's called manglement?

    2. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Disaster movie

      The article describes *another* in a series of movie pitches that would have failed in years past. No one would have believed this plot. *No one*. Microsoft releasing Windows software that can't do more-than-one window? Coronavirus proving Western civilization has rejected toilet-training? Trump being elected as a champion for the common people? Brexit?

      It would seem the utterly ridiculous plot for Idiocracy was the last intelligent movie premise.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      @druck - Nah, it's more like

      they don't give a sh$%^t. And why would they ?

  2. MacroRodent Silver badge

    So, win32 API

    ... is still the way if one wants to write an application that actually works smoothly, and is distributable?

    1. werdsmith Silver badge

      Re: So, win32 API

      That's a reasonable description of VS Code, which I believe is an Electron application.

    2. badflorist

      Re: So, win32 API

      "still the way"

      Yeh... and to not take their advice on the icons/font so that your program doesn't look immediately like shit or, possibly "refreshed"/replaced in a few years to MS's liking and not yours.

      I suspect they'll eventually put their hooks into Win32 API and bork it. Everyone assumes they won't for backwards compatibility, which is probably true, but I don't think backwards compatibility is in MS's future. When that day comes, I'm sure they'll leave in a few old hooks, just enough to get you on their cloud.

    3. Anonymous Coward
      Anonymous Coward

      Re: So, win32 API

      ... and is actually futureproof

  3. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Complete waste of time

    Why would anyone want to design a UI without a visual designer

    This is why ALL modern apps and web apps look like complete and utter shite

    Why the hell have we gone back to 1980 and mainframe CICS methodology

    What brain dead diversity hire thought this was a good idea

    Modern developers are absolute rubbish - completely clueless - no idea how to design a DB and the worst UI's ever

    1. elsergiovolador Silver badge

      The problem with apps designed by visual designers is that they are likely never going to be the end users nor they have necessary domain knowledge about what they are designing.

      So you end up getting an app that looks "cool", but is as useful as wet toilet paper.

      1. Lusty

        I assumed they meant graphical rapid app development environment like Delphi or Visual Studio rather than a hipster in Starbucks defining the interface. As opposed to the current baffling trend to define the interface as code so that it usually looks like shite on most devices, and randomly fogets to render some useful widgets.

      2. BrownishMonstr

        "If they wanted it to look pretty, they'd hire someone to make it pretty. You don't get the engineer to design the car, do you*?"

        *The sexy design, not designing for manufacturing, assembly, and aerodynamics.

  4. LDS Silver badge
    Devil

    "support for multiple Windows was not finished in time to be included in 1.0"

    Microsoft always has to restart from Windows 1.0

  5. John Brown (no body) Silver badge

    Eh...what?

    With the mention of Windows SDK 1.0 and WinUI 3.0, I was expecting an article about MS open sourcing the original Windows SDK :-)

    Probably because I just read the article about the Win 3.1 mouse driver

  6. ColonelClaw

    Honestly I'm kind-of surprised that Push Notifications weren't the first feature to be implimented. That's if current MS apps are anything to go by.

  7. Anonymous Coward
    Trollface

    Typo in headline?

    Surely it should've been called Project Onion because there are so many layers and it'll make adults cry.

  8. elsergiovolador Silver badge

    Abandonware

    I bet it is going to be abandoned half way.

    Then few years later we will have Project Togetherness.

  9. Howard Sway Silver badge

    "Performance will be an area of focus for us in 2022" said the team

    Yes, in the 22nd year of the 21st century Microsoft will still be trying to make the ill-designed software they've rushed out perform at a reasonable speed, rather than starting with a clear logical design that will perform well in the first place.

    Is it called Project Union because it feels like any sluggish GUI application built with it has gone on strike?

  10. pip25
    WTF?

    Why was this released?

    Some project manager decided that it has to be out around when .NET 6 becomes available, otherwise... well, just because? This thing is obviously not ready, even by Microsoft's standards.

  11. Anonymous Coward
    Anonymous Coward

    Reading Raymond Chen's musings on the various flavours of WinRT...

    ...makes me realise that the only person qualified to write modern software for Windows is probably Raymond Chen.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022